What experience is needed to be POTUS...?
 

With all this talk about Obama's lack of experience to be POTUS...and McCain's lifetime in DC making him too much of an insider...and Hillary's self proclaimed proper experience, I believe it's only appropriate that we define exactly what experience is necessary to be a viable candidate for POTUS.

Once we clearly define the character, practical experience and accomplishments needed to be a viable candidate, can we then assess the critters competing for the top job in Washington. Otherwise, it's all smoke and mirrors (hmmmm) with no basis for said evaluation. So...please, submit your scope of criteria that a proper candidate should exhibit.


Double post. Mod: Please delete. Thx.