| 911pcars |
04-02-2008 10:23 PM |
Some perspective.
While this whole Max Mosley situation is pretty bizarre, and enriched fodder for gossip mags and internet entertainment, isn't everyone entitled to do what they want in the privacy of their own house .... or faux Nazi torture dungeon, as long as adults are consenting participants?
If a hidden video camera caught him having sex with his wife, it might've also been broadcast on the web. IMHO, that's nobody's business except theirs.
It's like the Pamela Anderson video except her husband was responsible for disseminating that encounter (pun intended).
IMO, we're too preoccupied with what others do in private. This might be a DNA remnant from Puritan roots or just a case of "people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones". Apparently, there's a sizeable percentage of our population longing to see snapshots of Jennifer Aniston's gams in her backyard, Britney Spears in everyday civilian makeup at the mall or a hooker giving Elliot Spitzer $4000 worth of service. However, I didn't realize a view of Mosely's a$$ was in that high of a demand. I'm expecting at least a two page "spread" in next month's Star magazine (minimum 6 colorized pages in Stern). If so, everyone else is fair game. Bernie. Next time you're in the loo, smile, and wear a dress that's more becoming to your rackish figure.
The govt. must hire Fox News, and specifically Bill O'Reilly, to increase the production value of domestic surveillance recordings. Why must our govt., or the Internet for that matter, settle for grainy, low-res B&W images and without the added bonus of self-rightous moral commentary?
Sherwood
|
