Snowjob is of course referring to Stephen Dawkins:

http://www.resonancepub.com/shawki2.gif

Dawkins is certainly in a wheel chair, both physically and mentally.

While it is amazing that this guy can even communicate, it is not so amazing that his ideas are totally crap.

I had a minor in nuclear physics, and I am totally underwhelmed by this guys ideas. I understand the theory of relativity, but I do not understand a single thing that this guy presents about the state of the human condition. WHY? Because his ideas are total crap, that simple.

Stephen Hawking is in a wheelchair and suffers from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Wow. Just wow. You never cease to entertain.

And with the "homo" comments, me thinks you doth protest too much.

Yes, just when you think snowjob has reached the limits of lunacy, inaccuracy and the ability to live in an "alternate reality," he turns it up to 11!

http://newhumanist.org.uk/images/070...ins-jacket.jpg

He can walk! First Moses, now this! :D

Best,

Kurt

The homos defend their own. But when will they talk about ID or something that is scientific? Cats got their toung or they are to stupid to answer a real question about ID.

Are you off your meds or something?

I was defending Stephen Hawking.

Snowjob tried so hard to prove the existence of God in the other thread.

Most people say they would believe in God if they witnessed a true miracle.

Now, for the first time, here it is, in front of hundreds of people, AND captured on video!

Forward to the 1:01:07 mark, and bear witness!

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qR_z85O0P2M&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qR_z85O0P2M&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

Closest thing I can come to a scientific and ID discussion is really a question/problem:

How long would it take the snowman below to melt, knowing that his BAC is about 1.6, and he is in immediate proximity of the master of ID, the Flying Spaghetti Monster?

Please show your work.


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1208847591.gif

no, he just struck out at Rage tonight and is really angry...

jeffgrant

Your problem makes as much sense as any Dawkins one does. He is clearly on meds or delusional. Its a pity that some people take his rantings seriously. Truly a pity. Maybe I should take some mind altering drugs so I can get on the same "VIB" as Dawkins. SO far he is the only reason I can come up with to ban such drugs, anyone that delusional is certainly at risk of harming oneself or others.

As usual, snowman's rantings refer much more to him than whatever he is ranting about.

With Dawkins, I wish it were true. His influence to the uninformed, idiots of the world is truly harmful, your post is evidence of his perverse influence on the un-medicated.

Why do you always confuse Stephen Hawking and Richard Dawkins? Or aren't you paying enough attention to tell them apart?

I really believe that Snowman is making all of this up. It's just too funny. No one can - on one hand - claim to be so intelligent and then on the other hand make such obvious mistakes of identity, logic, reason...etc. I think the sprinkling of homophobia and the liberal use of the word "commie" whenever he gets the chance is the icing on the cake. The absolute absurdities in his rants on the "logic of religion" are just over the top. No one could actually think that way - it's just too funny.

He obviously is making this all up just to have some fun.

Snowman is either an utterly disgusting human piece of human flotsam, or he is the funniest chap on the interweb.

I cant decide, but I lean to the latter, because I enjoy a good taking of the urine.

God bless you snowman.

You seem to having trouble following this thread. I am not attempting to explain I.D at all, I never claimed to do so. I am merely showing that you cannot rule it out as a possibility to how life "began" not evolved "began" you seem to keep drifting back to the same old evolution is true debate. But according to every living and dead scientist, evolution (micro and macro) CANNOT account for how life "began" If you want to keep arguing evolution in itself, there is an entire thread devoted to that very topic. I know its hard, but try and fight off the ADD.

I think the rest of us are having trouble following your logic. Let me simplify it for you.

Origin of life on the pre-biotic earth = abiogenesis

Diversification of life from the Last Common Universal Ancestor = evolution