![]() |
Quote:
Jim, I mentioned the commonality of supply as a result of watching several years of local farmers fighting against well registration, water use restrictions, paying for water usage etc. In my area the water aquifers cover a huge area. Local farmers use a lot of irrigation and for years had no restrictions governing their misuse. In the end they pretty much lost the battle due to the fact that the water supply trancends property boundries. They couldn't prove that their use stopped at their border which you could with say, mineral rights or logging rights. With more people wanting to develop (their American Capitolistic given right), tougher measures will be needed for us all to coexist. |
Yeah, tough measures. If we cut off water going south, Northern Cali's water woes would be solved, for a while.
|
Too many people.
The root of all problems. When people start keeping their flys zipped up and the population starts returning to a sustainable size, we'll all collectively be better off. But until then (last I checked, spitting out babies was more popular than dying) things are only gonna' get worse. |
Quote:
You can be nice and tell them that they are wasting the water since it evaporates. |
Wait, you have a well and they're restricting your usage?
|
Yeah, go figure. Its so deep I am actually tapping water from jdiots backyard. :D
Juan - gotcha now, this is sort of the jist of this rant too, enact a water restriction, old farts go nuts and start watering all day on their days to save their lawns and use twice as much water than when there was no restriction. I might just start dropping dimes, of course once I reset my sprinklers. :D |
hello from aus, the land of water restrictions SmileWavy
no watering the lawn (i dont know why people do this anyway...havent watered mine EVER and its still nice and green) no watering the garden (now you can do it once a week) no watering hard surfaces (fuch knows why people water the pavement anyway!) no washing the car |
Quote:
The aquifers themselves are not given the chance to recharge. Developers are demanding increased footprint %s from the planning commission to maximize profits from developed land. My county should be focusing on decreasing hardscape and offering incentives for the replacement of concrete/asphalt with permeable solutions. I've done all that I can do on a personal level. Removed our asphalt drive and replaced it with paving bricks/sand, removed a concrete patio and replaced it with flag stone, created an off drive parking area with concrete block on side planted with grasses. Hard to enlighten the people that just want to concrete over everything. |
Quote:
|
you do understand that when the well runs dry there is no more water right?
most of us have wells. it's not like the city buys aquafina and dumps it into a pump that sends it to your house. google 'aquifer'. i'm no expert but aquifers can/are shared by many people and this can include the township down the road. when these get low it's a very real concern. |
Quote:
Good job on the update on your own land/property! It gets more complicated depending on soil conditions. If you have very fine, clay-like soils, they can expand/contract wildly depending on moisture content. As such, you have to know what the best approach is from a development standpoint prior to doing anything. The traditional "el cheapo" developer solution is always to hardscape everything and plug in storm drains where they have to. NOT always the best, I agree 100%! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm surprised however, that I haven't been lambasted here as a tree hugging, hippie, greenie, left wing wack job because of my environmental conservationist values......yet.:rolleyes::D |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website