"FTA" is a play on acronyms. The F usualy doesn't stand for "free". Jane seemed to know what she was doing with the name of her tour.

There are lots of women that looked good naked I didn't like, my ex wife is right up there with "we're not fonda Jane"

I know a few places where these would go over great!!!

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1215909871.jpg

Just do this and forget for a moment that Fonda was misguided on the Viet Nam deal. She wasn't right at all to do what she did, but what air head Hollywood actress has done all the right things all the time?

http://www.videosift.com/video/Barbarella-Opener-Jane-Fonda-taking-off-her-space-suit

sorry Milt, I don't see your point. Britany hasn't posed for the Taliban, Paris hasn't posed for Usama, sure they do dumb things. Just isn't the same game.

And neither of them has been around long enough to realize any mistakes.

Look, I'm not married to Fonda, I just see things the way I see them.

Still harping on Vietnam? I wonder why? Remember that Korean War that they charged with desertion just a few years back? Remember the reacent article where an estimated 100,000++ North Korean prisoners were killed for convenience?

Since we can discuss the past openly(it seems), why don't we talk about draft avoidance and desertion again.....
...Cheney. .... W. .....

Bill Clinton?

But then that is a topic for another thread isn't it.

"Don't know what you are talking about"
That about sums it up.

Lots of them have shown bad judgment -- maybe not as bad. It was certainly a controversial war ans she was quite young.

BUT... has she ever apologized for any of it? Or tried to explain/apologize or put in context/apologize?

I don't recall any thing like that. IF not, it's a pretty glaring failure.

--------------------

OK, it looks like she did apologize. So you guys can argue about whether it was a good enough apology or not.

Also, looks like she was older then than I thought she was...

I haven't felt the need to disagree with anything so strongly in a long, long time.

That POS did more to cause us to lose that war than any other person I can think of.
The damage she did undoubtedly contributed to many lost lives of US soldiers. How many were permanently maimed because of her assistance to the enemy? I'd like to see you face them and say that she wasn't that bad.

She was actively campaigning and fighting against our country at a time of war, aiding and abetting the enemy and helping them any way she could and what she did was nothing less than treason.
Pretending it wasn't or that she wasn't that bad is a great insult to all that brave soldiers who fought for our country.
I'd prefer to appreciate and respect their sacrifices than to insult them.

I'd piss on jane fonda unless she was on fire. Then I'd let her burn.

If you know about your hated USA slaughtering 100k prisoners I believe you need to make like a cheerleader & spit it out.

The fact that she was a reasonably attractive stripper 40 years ago means nothing except that she had a promising future as a 2 bit prostitute. Unfortunately she chose the vietcong as her customer but ended up screwing the United States of America.

Climbing out of a sports car without any drawers on is bad judgment. What Jane Fonda did was commit treason!

both of you need to go look up treason - start with the Constitution.

but, come to think of it, when did either of you let facts interfere with your foul mouths...

John 70t
Remember that Korean War that they charged with desertion just a few years back?

Spit it out, what are you talking about?

"Remember the reacent article where an estimated 100,000++ North Korean prisoners were killed for convenience?"

Spit it out, what are you talking about?

ANything else I can help you with? Is Dipso posting under your name?
TREASON - This word imports a betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance.

The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.

PS according to that Jane should be shot.

In the first case I think he talking about American GI who did, in fact, desert to the N. Korean side and lived happily there for 50-odd years. He married a Japanese woman, perhaps one of the ones the N. Koreans kidnapped, and then was granted some kind of guarantee by the U.S. that he wouldn't be arrested when he traveled to Japan to see a dying relative.

In the second case, I have no idea what he's talking about.

Neither does he.

Not at all. YOu may want to stay far away from the law.

or you can go look at what the S Ct. thinks about the matter.

JF was in no way guilty of treason.