| stuartj |
08-07-2008 05:42 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott R
(Post 4106973)
I got mine from my wife in 87' it's lasted this long and still looks like new. I've dived with it in almost every ocean, so a few hundred here and there does not bother me. I really don't think a Seiko would have done that for me, and I'm not sure how well a Seiko works at 4 atmospheres.
|
Its nice to hear of someone using a Rolex in the manner it was designed for- but you would not need to be concerned about a $200 Sekio Diver. Seiko make some of the most well regarded and serious dive watches of all. The cheapie ones are spectacular watches for the money and are real 200m divers, available with mechanical movements. They are the functional equivalent of a Submariner,and Seiko have been making serious divers since the early 60s.
The serious end of the Seiko range is for people wanting a dive watch, not people wanting a Rolex.
http://www.higuchi-inc.com/SBDX001-5.jpg
Seiko are a fascinating manaufacturer. It is the largest manufacturer in the world. It makes everything in its watches, down to the Luminova used on the faces. Aside from its eco- drives and quartz and digital movements, it manufactures a number of mechanical movements. The "Grand Seiko" watches, sold only in Japan, are fine mechanical watches which are equal to anything that comes from the Swiss houses.
You cant really go wrong with Seiko at any price point, except in the bling dept.
|