![]() |
Are you radical, irrational? The "Specific" ITAG Poll
Choice 3 is for folks who generally believe there is a God, but are not 100% certain.
Choice 4 is for folks who generally believe there is not a God, but are not 100% certain. Well? I will argue that folks checking either of the "100% certain" boxes are irrational. I am 100% certain of that. :) edit: I'm aware that the last two statements are logically identical, but choosing one over the other does show bias, IMO. Best, |
can't figure out the difference between choices 3 and 4.
|
Quote:
Seriously, you don't see the bias of one choice over the other? |
Would it be better to ask in the positive?
it is (highly) probable it is (highly) improbable |
Quote:
I guess I didn't expect this much confusion. :confused: This thread is much too young to die. :) |
Those who are not 100% certain there is a God, will be soon...
KT |
Stuart, the: you guys don't like the choice wording?
Choice 3 is for folks who generally believe there is a God, but are not 100% certain. Choice 4 is for folks who generally believe there is not a God, but are not 100% certain. |
Hmm, I may be 50/50 on the god issue, so both choices still look equally attractive to me.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're radically moderate on this subject, it appears. In the middle of the fence you straddle. |
The likelihood of an invisible friend is infinitesimally small.
|
Quote:
|
I've been overrun by free radicals. :eek:
|
Poll results, so far, as I suspected. :)
Best, |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
what's your definition of "God"?
|
Quote:
I don't believe in a judeo Christian god, but I also think we humans are pretty primitive creatures. There is plenty left to discover in this universe of ours. I am sure that with time we will come to discover and understand forces that are beyond our comprehension today. |
Is there a God?
If the answer is no, the question is of little consequences If the answerr is yes, the question is of infinite consequences |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The poll provides an option for such folks who believe this. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's my opinion. |
so low signal/noise is the answer?
I'm not sure that I'd hang my hat on that one, but everyone is free to their interpretation of the data or lack thereof. In the science world one can point to many low signals later being able to be pulled out of the noise. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Chaos theory comes to mind re low signal/noise, IMO, so I agree with your statement. I think you might agree that humans also tend to create causal relationships for non-causal events, i.e. seeing "god" in good things and dismissing "it" when bad things occur. edit: This human trait creates the illusion of a "signal". 2¢ Best, |
Quote:
|
I was gonna score a touchdown until Jesus made me fumble...
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website