![]() |
I didn't watch the last hour slide..I needed to go to WAMU.
Anyway closing on the low of the day does not warm my heart. Just makes me more nervous than this morning. Not a good sign. Seems like the market discounted LEH, MER/BAC and AIG seemed to be the focus of the day. Std Poors did not down grade at least till Wednesday. They need 20B bridge loan until they can sell some of their assets for FMV. Fed is going to have to take action, somebody is going to have to take action. OR else. One ray is that oil has droped to $94 and change today. Money was disappearing faster today then it could be printed. |
Quote:
Where's FDR and "The New Deal" when we need it? |
I'm sticking with my prediction from early this year that the DOW will be sub-10,000 by the end of the year or early 2009 at the latest. "Bottom" won't be until 1Q or 2Q 2009 probably. Maybe even a little later.
I also think Washington Mutual and Citigroup are dead before this thing starts to turn around. |
Quote:
You mean like building offshore research and drilling rigs and platforms? Sorry. We hardly do that anymore... Or maybe building nuclear power plants?? No - we are worried that plants built in the 60s, designed in the 50s and blew up in the 70s are our only option. That may not happen.... Face it dd - low end manufacturing is dead. Or is not 20 million illegals enough for you?? Not like you (or your kids) want an assembly line job. FDR was along time ago.. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Unfortunately a bit of both..:( High end construction/manufacturing jobs in this county go unfilled to a lack of skills and a million other reasons. I have been there. They cant get people. Billions and billions we send overseas could be spent here. Particularly in the energy sector. We live a world with no real conversation or debate about the future or how technology keeps moving forward. How many oil spills in the gulf lately?? Why would drilling in Florida, California or Alaska be so bad? When was the last nuclear power plant built and added to the grid?? |
Quote:
Do the FED/Treasury department realize they are pushing on a string? Are they out of bullets? Is LEH not worth saving? John, I sold my 911 and bought an M3. My ride handles much better than a 911, so there's little risk of me going over the cliff. You ass draggers better not take me out, OK? jürgen |
Treasury and Fed must believe that the fallout from a LEH BK, in the event they could not pressure Wall Street into doing a private rescue, was manageable.
And they must have a view on the benefits of letting LEH fail. One benefit would be to force other vulnerable institutions to sell themselves and thus accelerate the consolidation of the financial industry. There is money out there - private equity, vulture funds, guys like Buffett, and cash sitting on the sidelines at other investors including sovereigns. There is a ton of money waiting. Off the cuff, it could well total several trillion dollars. But that money is sitting on its hands, it believes that troubled institutions and their troubled assets are still being valued too richly. It won't step in until there is even more blood in the streets. The govt should know pretty well what exposure other financial institutions have to LEH as counterparty and as debtor, and what the realistic liquidation value of LEH's assets are. I would expect them to have the financial numbers right. What they also need to get right is the investor psychology. E.g. as soon as Treasury received the legal authority to take over FNM/FRE and subordinate/wipe out common and preferred equity - the so-called "bazooka" - arguably that eliminated any chance for FNM/FRE to raise additional equity capital - since any potential new equityholder knew they'd be stepping into the bazooka's sights. I guess it is possible that the govt did not foresee that investor psychology. So, hopefully they have got both the numbers and the psychology right. For LEH and for AIG, and for the other institutions that will fail. Quote:
|
Quote:
>>>Sept. 16 (Bloomberg) -- JPMorgan Chase & Co. gave $138 billion this week in Federal Reserve-backed advances to the broker dealer unit of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. to settle Lehman trades and keep financial markets stable amid the biggest bankruptcy in history, according to a court filing. <<< The whole article: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aX7mhYCHmVf8&refer=home Wall Street, with the Treasury and Fed's assistance, is raping Main Street and transferring hundreds of billions in losses from the private sector to the taxpayer. We are witnessing the largest robbery in the history of the world -- and the criminals robbing the public are selling their theft as "doing a good thing." If you have investments in the stock market, GET YOUR MONEY OUT NOW! |
The latest development is that Barclays is buying, subject to Bankruptcy court approval, the N. American trading unit and NY headquarters after weekend negotiations. They did not want Lehmann's "toxic investments in the residential and commercial property markets".
|
Looks like Barclays got a steal. $1.7BN for LEH's North American investment banking and capital markets business plus NYC headquarters and data centers. The real estate is reportedly worth $1.5BN so they're paying just $200MM for a major i-banking business. Plus in talks to buy LEH's Asia, Europe business.
Similar going on in UK. Lloyds TSB looking to buy mortgage lender HBOS whose shares are in tailspin. |
From Interest Rate Roundup: http://interestrateroundup.blogspot.com/
Quote:
|
Turbo6bar, can you please give me a quick explanation as to why LIBOR is skyrocketing? I thought it typically went down with our own T-bills. I know they're not linked with each other, but I thought they basically paralleled. My ARM is tied to LIBOR and, although I have another 14 mos. to worry about it, I am keeping an eye on it periodically.
|
Rising LIBOR is a reflection of the fear and risk in the market. Banks don't want to lend precious capital.
The falling treasury rates is a reflection of demand and desire for security. Investors would prefer the safety of T-bills yielding 0.28% vs hold equities, commodities, or credit instruments. When perceived risks were low, LIBOR, T-bills, and the Federal Funds Target Rate moved together, but the financial crisis has changed the game. Jurgen |
Geeze. I hope LIBOR comes back down in the next year or so.
|
Yeah, you and AIG are thinking the same. Their $85B loan is at 850 bp above LIBOR. They must be really hurting to take those terms.
More from the "ruh roh, raggy" file: Morgan Stanley CEO:'Need a partner or not going to survive' Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes, yes, lets all panic. Make sure you head to the bank with a torch and pitch fork in the morning and get out all of your money money tomorrow as well. There is only one thing that matters in this equation, and that is the liquidity of the Treasury. The lender of last resort. As long as they can raise capital, there is no issue here. Are people going to get hurt? Off course. But the overall system is fine if people out there are still will to buy Treasury bills. And the funny thing is, they don't really have a lot of good options. How many buildings can you build in Dubai? |
Quote:
The overall system is not fine, as I have been explaining on other threads. My comments about getting out of the market are not "panic," but a rational reaction to the events occurring in our economy. I try not to repeat myself in responses on different threads, but my comment: Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website