| 
		
			| Rick Lee | 10-16-2008 09:27 PM |  
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
 
					Originally Posted by RWebb
					(Post 4243524)
				 also - 2/3 of the people who have sub-prime loans actually were qualified for normal, lower interest, lower fee loans!   we clearly want to go after loan brokers in those cases
 
 last i heard the fbi had two different investigations going on the big bank/ins. houses
 
 |  
Why is it wrong to put someone in a subprime loan who could get an A paper loan?  Isn't it up to the borrower to shop around?  If I can get a better rate from my credit union, but go with the builder's lender, does that make the builder a criminal for not turning me away?  
 
Of all the subprime loans I originated, I never saw one that could could have gone A paper.  When you have a FICO in the low 600's, no documentable income and no cash for a down payment, believe me, you don't qualify for anything better than subprime.  My own boss got a subprime loan for his big house.  As a 100% commission income guy, he'd have had to average two years of tax returns minues expenses to qualify in an A paper loan.  He didn't want to bother, though he made almost enough in a year as the house cost.  So he did a stated income, 100% loan.  He could have gotten A paper but didn't want to.  Is that criminal?  Are lenders required to give someone their rock bottm price every time?  How about car dealers?  Airlines?  Why can I get a ticket for $300 sitting next to someone who pauid $600 for the same flight? |