Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Honda Dropping the S2000 (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/453079-honda-dropping-s2000.html)

PorschePilot 01-23-2009 04:37 PM

Honda Dropping the S2000
 
I heard on the news today that Honda is dropping the S2000. Do you think that will mean more Boxster sales?

UconnTim97 01-23-2009 04:53 PM

I thought they were developing a replacement S3000. It was in a few magazines this summer.

pwd72s 01-23-2009 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UconnTim97 (Post 4438470)
I thought they were developing a replacement S3000. It was in a few magazines this summer.

Me too...rumored to have more power, and more importantly, more torque.

Porsche-O-Phile 01-23-2009 05:36 PM

I'll believe it when I see it.

Honda. Torque. Hahahahahaha!!!

UconnTim97 01-23-2009 05:40 PM

Yes, the torque will be welcomed. Later generations smartly sacrificed the upper end RPMs for the additional torque. Who needs a car that redlines over 8000 RPMS with a lawnmowers torque until 5000 RPM?

Seriously though, I am shopping an S2000 for my next weekend sporty car.

Porsche-O-Phile 01-23-2009 05:44 PM

I test-drove the S2K when I was car shopping (ended up buying the M.B. SLK320). Not bad. Felt fine and reasonably tight, but the lack of torque was simply maddening. It would have been horrible as a daily driver because you'd have everyone and their brother getting the jump on you from lights and in traffic and then cutting you off because you had nothing to fight back with. Seriously, I've driven minivans and pickup trucks that accelerated faster.

I will admit once it was wound up it came alive and was quite fun but I also can't see driving it like that on a regular basis without looking/sounding like a complete boy-racer idiot.

UconnTim97 01-23-2009 05:50 PM

I agree, would be an excellent car if it could drop the first 5000 RPMs. My friend is a Civic SI guy, great cars with similar engines, but useless in the city where we live.

89911 01-23-2009 07:32 PM

I find is amusing to hear complaints of torque from the 911 crowd. If this was the Buick Grand National board, I'd understand. I always thought the S2000 was marketed wrong. It is a really capable car and would be my choice for a cab if I was ever in the market for one. (Plus I don't fit in one, but thats another story).

dd74 01-23-2009 07:45 PM

A guy in L.A. wanted to trade me his S2000 for my 911.

Hmmm...

vash 01-23-2009 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dd74 (Post 4438779)
A guy in L.A. wanted to trade me his S2000 for my 911.

Hmmm...


step back, slowly. your 911 is friggen bad arse. the insanity.

i love the S2000, but he car is a total one hit wonder. it would be a great commuter here with the HOV lanes, but one trip to home depot would be a bummer.

R390 01-23-2009 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dd74 (Post 4438779)
A guy in L.A. wanted to trade me his S2000 for my 911.

Hmmm...

good greif, I would have had him write a 50 page essay to you about the orgin of Porshce just for him waisting your time like that.



Honda= How Odd No Dam Accleration.

VTEC = its veetak to inner city folk.

oh btw enjoy the influx of those honda owners making thier way into the Euro car market, dont worry I will be in the bushes sniping them.

MattKellett 01-23-2009 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 89911 (Post 4438757)
I find is amusing to hear complaints of torque from the 911 crowd. If this was the Buick Grand National board, I'd understand. I always thought the S2000 was marketed wrong. It is a really capable car and would be my choice for a cab if I was ever in the market for one. (Plus I don't fit in one, but thats another story).

Exactly what I was thinking !!!

My car doesn't even come alive until 4500 rpms, and then it just glorious :) I drove an early S2000, and even though it's lacking in torque, the engine revs so freely, that before you know, you're in the power band and up to 7000 rpm. Similar to the RX8, it's so hard to drive at those rpms, just feels so unnatural to have the engine screaming away!

It's a shame to see the S2000 go, I don't think it'll change the Boxster sales that much, if any - are they really seen as competitors? I see the Boxster's main competition from the BMW Z4 and SLK.

m21sniper 01-23-2009 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 89911 (Post 4438757)
I find is amusing to hear complaints of torque from the 911 crowd. If this was the Buick Grand National board, I'd understand. I always thought the S2000 was marketed wrong. It is a really capable car and would be my choice for a cab if I was ever in the market for one. (Plus I don't fit in one, but thats another story).

I had a Grand National, the lack of torque was quickly and massively overcome at about 2800rpm. :)

Those are seriously bad-ass cars.

PS: The Saturn Sky and dodge viper are both also being canceled.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.