Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Toyko Fed Ex Crash (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/464562-toyko-fed-ex-crash.html)

edgemar 03-22-2009 06:29 PM

Toyko Fed Ex Crash
 
Has anyone see this video. What happened?

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/V6cMK9LUnzI&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/V6cMK9LUnzI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Porsche-O-Phile 03-22-2009 06:40 PM

Looks like possibly a microburst or windshear issue, or some sort of catastrophic control failure immediately before. Hard to tell for certain.

Very awful crash though.

DSouth 03-22-2009 06:44 PM

Wow! I just got back from Tokyo yesterday.

rouxroux 03-22-2009 06:56 PM

Yeah...MD-11...Normy, what was it? wind? Looks like the nose gear took a few bounces. :(

EDIT: Normy, just saw your other thread....tragic.

m21sniper 03-22-2009 07:08 PM

His nose just dropped like a rock at the last second before touch down.

I'm seriously doubting any pilot would do that. I'll go out on a limb and say some sort of mechanical or computer problem.

Dottore 03-22-2009 07:18 PM

Looks like a loading/weight distribution issue to me.

MT930 03-22-2009 08:31 PM

Wake Turbulence ? Looks like it porpoised and rolled very sad.

Porsche-O-Phile 03-22-2009 08:33 PM

It'd have to be some pretty serious wake turbulence to upset a heavy MD11. Don't know of too many airplanes that could kick up a wake that strong.

Absolutely horrible crash. Reminded me of the B2 crash a while back - simply nothing you can do with so little airspeed and loss of directional control. You're so vulnerable at that point...

DasBoot 03-22-2009 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dottore (Post 4561236)
Looks like a loading/weight distribution issue to me.

That happened here (FLL) about two years ago to a UPS plane. Load shifted on take-off. Pilots survived, however.

Edit: This article cites high winds: http://www.airdisaster.com/news/article.php?id=49

Zef 03-23-2009 03:39 AM

Microburst......???? Look like a L-1011 crash in the eighties.....

onewhippedpuppy 03-23-2009 04:43 AM

Supposedly there were pretty nasty cross-wind conditions at that time.

beepbeep 03-23-2009 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zef (Post 4561680)
Microburst......???? Look like a L-1011 crash in the eighties.....

It's bad to speculate before they pull the info off the FDR and CVR but it indeed looks like microburst, sudden pitch-up, overcorrection, hard hit which broke left undercarriage, then cartwheel.

I find the video very disturbing. One of those freak-accidents.

Are MD-11 reversers manual or automatic-triggered?

fingpilot 03-23-2009 08:32 AM

Landing at Narita in a crosswind can be a handful. The terminals and the rows of fuel bunkers throw quite a wake quite a ways downwind. You'll think you have it nailed, then everything goes crazy, usually 10 feet over the runway as you come into the wind shadow of them. Winds were running 45+ knots at the time (not unusual there).

Lets wait to see the results of the DFDR and CVR outputs before we go too far afield.

Heel n Toe 03-23-2009 09:53 AM

Look at the first of the three video segments here... after main gear contacts the runway, the front gear slams down hard, then the whole plane bounces violently off the runway before coming back down nose first:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3rkrrrF6Ls&feature=related

fingpilot 03-23-2009 10:24 AM

Normy;

First off, condolences to the FedEx family.

Gang:

The MD11 is the growth variant of the DC10. The similarities end there. Because of the 'stretch' and the redesign of the DC10 into what eventually became the MD11, there were quite a few systems and design changes that occurred as the plane matured. The type rating was different for the two. There was even a MD10, a back variant of the MD11 using the DC10 airframe.

The investigation will sort out the actual cause, but as it does, you'll hear all about the autospoilers, the SAS added to compensate for a different tailplane, the 'active horizontal stab', and the unusual pitches that config change (some of it automatic) and power changes have on flying this series of plane. It was a very complex relationship. Yes, I've seen the videos, showing the first set of touchdowns, and watched the crash progress. I think there were several things going on all at once. But the only important part of it all is to wait for the data from the orange box before speculating.

You'll hear some nicknames given to the MD11 that are not funny. It was a modern, very capable machine based on a venerable design. Flown by a very capable crew.

Lest we ever forget, a crash is NEVER a single event brought on by a single event. Murphy is a passenger on every flight.

We will all learn from this and every crash.

And mourn the loss of friends.

Tim Hancock 03-23-2009 10:36 AM

Looks to me as if the left main gear gave up the ghost after a very hard bounce. Obviously the bottom must have fell out on his initial flare which resulted in the horrendous bounce.

I have no experience in the big stuff, but in the small private aircraft I fly, I simply raise my final approach speed signifigantly on gusty day landings and fly it on landing long. I am guessing that option is not available to the same degree with the big heavy birds.

fingpilot 03-23-2009 10:59 AM

A Crosswind MD11 landing at Narita.
 
This shot is the same type of plane, taken from the other side of the same runway at the same airport. The long runway at Narita has big structures on both sides of the runway. In the crash videos, you can see the rows of big tanks (never bet you'd guess what they are full of...) in the background. The terminals are lining the opposite side of the runway. All of these obstructions make any crosswind an attention-getting event. A 'Windshear Alert' is commonplace at Narita. The video here shows a 'normal' MD11 crosswind landing. Watch very closely.

Angle of yaw as plane approaches the runway.
Rudder (above engine on tail) swinging markedly as pilot deals with x-wind.
Tips of the wings and winglets flexing with the turbulence.
Elevator going both very positive and negative as plane crosses fence, then,
Elevators still responding down after mains touch down.
Autospoilers partially deploying with mains touchdown (40 degrees), then,
Finally deploying to 60 degrees when nosegear touches down.
Plane leaning left as it rolls out after touchdown (away from the wind).
Rudder still very actively swinging as pilot inputs to keep plane on runway.

The rulebook says you add half the xwind to the final speed, plus any gust.
Yes, you can have an 11000 foot runway that is too short.

Here's the vid;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWZzxqQMoro

t6dpilot 03-23-2009 12:44 PM

First off, condolences to the families of the Fed Ex pilots. Horrible crash. I sure as heck hope it is not anyone I know. Fingpilot, that is a great vid. Those guys must have been sweating bullets as they say. Man that really shows the work that goes into fighting a big crosswind. Nice job. I can remember some of my toughest CW landings in my T6 and a Twin Beech - 22G28 90 degrees to the runway are a couple I can remember. That'll wrap you tight...

rattlsnak 03-23-2009 03:00 PM

You guys are missing the beginning of the video. There is tire smoke already. The plane touched down once, and then got airborne again resulting in the hard/bounce landing.

Seahawk 03-23-2009 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingpilot (Post 4562347)
Lest we ever forget, a crash is NEVER a single event brought on by a single event. Murphy is a passenger on every flight.

We will all learn from this and every crash.

And mourn the loss of friends.

All true.

No idea what caused the porpoise (pilot induced oscillation, computer failure, etc.). To hazard a guess is inappropriate at this time.

The left gear does fail and the rapid increase in AoA and left roll are extreme.

Condolences to the FedEx family and the families and friends of the aircrew..

fingpilot 03-23-2009 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rattlsnak (Post 4562911)
You guys are missing the beginning of the video. There is tire smoke already. The plane touched down once, and then got airborne again resulting in the hard/bounce landing.

Some of the crash vids do not include the first touchdown. Anyone that has seen the entire sequence gasps as the nose comes back up after the first touchdown. I know I did. In this plane spoiler deploy causes a nose up. Watch for it in the x-wind clip I attached. This plane also has 'nose lowering assist'. Intended to offset the spoiler deploy from the mains touchdown. Even then, only a partial deploy. The rest of the deploy is only on nose landing gear touchdown. Tail engine reverse is also inhibited past idle thrust until NLG on ground. A lot of artificial things intended to prevent the nose from coming back up after touchdown..

Normy 03-23-2009 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingpilot (Post 4562347)
Normy;

First off, condolences to the FedEx family.

Gang:

The MD11 is the growth variant of the DC10. The similarities end there. Because of the 'stretch' and the redesign of the DC10 into what eventually became the MD11, there were quite a few systems and design changes that occurred as the plane matured. The type rating was different for the two. There was even a MD10, a back variant of the MD11 using the DC10 airframe.

The investigation will sort out the actual cause, but as it does, you'll hear all about the autospoilers, the SAS added to compensate for a different tailplane, the 'active horizontal stab', and the unusual pitches that config change (some of it automatic) and power changes have on flying this series of plane. It was a very complex relationship. Yes, I've seen the videos, showing the first set of touchdowns, and watched the crash progress. I think there were several things going on all at once. But the only important part of it all is to wait for the data from the orange box before speculating.

You'll hear some nicknames given to the MD11 that are not funny. It was a modern, very capable machine based on a venerable design. Flown by a very capable crew.

Lest we ever forget, a crash is NEVER a single event brought on by a single event. Murphy is a passenger on every flight.

We will all learn from this and every crash.

And mourn the loss of friends.

First of all, thank you. All of us at "big purple" are saddened by this accident. We have been flying since April 1973, and this is the first time that any Fedex pilot has lost his or her life on the job.

-Let's face it, there is only ONE way to prevent aircraft accident: stop flying airplanes. That is, of course, ridiculous. All we can do is be as careful as possible. The rest? If you are religious, then you pray. I'm not religious, so I just hope for the best and study my aircraft operators manual on a regular basis.

[I keep it next to the toilet; best time to study, I've found! sorry~:rolleyes:]

I didn't know the pilots flying this airplane, though their names are familiar and I think I have jumpseated with them in the past. Everyone at Fedex is a different sort of person in my viewpoint. Everyone is friendly- the schedulers, the pilots, even the manual laborers who load our planes. At 0230 in the morning, I climb into the 727 and stow my rollaway and my backpack and one of the loaders will come into the cockpit and ask me to turn on the hydraulic system so that they can open the cargo door on the side of the plane. Usually some black guy about 21 years old...

"Hey! Howya dooin? Can ya turn on the hydraulics for the door?" he says with a smile. Even first thing in the morning, when we arrive at our destination at 6 AM, we climb down the stairs from the airplanes and our most basic laborers are smiling and saying "hey" or "How you doing?". I've worked at 6 [six!] airlines and I have never seen anything like this. This company, Fedex, is filled with very nice people.

As to what happened in Narita: I have never flown the MD-11 aircraft, but friends that have have told me that it is a difficult to land aircraft because the tail is too small. This is a stretched DC-10, but for some reason McDonnel Douglas decided to reduce the size of the horizontal stabilizer and elevator at the back of the plane. I suspect that the crew encountered wind shear, lost airspeed, and then the plane slammed into the runway. It bounced back into the air, then the nose dropped and the nosewheel and left main gear slammed into the runway excessively hard, the left wing broke off, and the plane rolled over onto its' back.

I have read that the crew survived the accident, but died en route to a Tokyo hospital. Pictures online show that fire did not reach the cockpit.

-Listen: Each of us climbs into a vehicle every day and go to work, school, grocery store, et cetra. Every time you leave the house, you run a risk. Don't let it stop you from driving your Porsche. Someone tomorrow will get killed in a car. Will it be me? Maybe. I don't think about that sort of thing when I climb into my 928, and I don't think about that when I climb into a 727 either. But I DO make sure my seat belt is attached properly.

Thanx for the thoughts. My thoughts are with my dead colleagues.

N!

rick-l 03-23-2009 07:20 PM

not app

450knotOffice 03-23-2009 07:47 PM

Excellent post Norm. So sad.

Heel n Toe 03-24-2009 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fingpilot (Post 4563057)
Some of the crash vids do not include the first touchdown. Anyone that has seen the entire sequence gasps as the nose comes back up after the first touchdown.

This one does: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3rkrrrF6Ls&feature=related

rhjames 03-24-2009 12:49 PM

a possible contributing factor:

when the DC 10 was converted to MD 11, and then further converted to cargo only status, the horizontal and vertical stabilizers were reduced in size for performance (speed/cargo capacity increases) gains.

this reduction in operating surfaces reduced the aircraft's ability to maintain attitude, whether it is nose up or nose down.

as my fighter jock parental figure tells me, it appears to be pilot error and over correction.

(disclaimer: fighter jock parental figure has flown many hot scramble alert sorties in the Japan theater in much worse conditions---raging typhoons)


only time and research will give the correct analysis of what actually happened in the cockpit.



condolences to the Fed Ex team.....

Jim727 03-24-2009 02:26 PM

Please add my name to the book of condolences. Losing a crew and aircraft is a rough experience - my very best to the full FedEx family.

74-911 03-30-2009 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim727 (Post 4565120)
Please add my name to the book of condolences. Losing a crew and aircraft is a rough experience - my very best to the full FedEx family.


I was in San Antonio today for some appts. When leaving around 2 this afternoon, on the north side of town heading down 281 South I came upon a small traffic jam as cars slowed and moved to the left lane. In the center lane were at least 50 white FedEx devlivery trucks with their liights flashing. I thought what is this, a FedEx funeral procession??? And it was. As I got to the front of the column there were 4-5 limos, a hearse and 6 motorcycle cops leading the way.

Pulled up the SA Express News on the web when I got home. One of the FedEx pilots killed in the crash had retired from the USAF and lived in San Antonio. The procession was heading towards Ft. Sam National cemetary.

Really a moving tribute to the pilot....


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.