Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Snakes are back! (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/473303-snakes-back.html)

T77911S 05-18-2009 08:44 AM

are you sure that one is dead? the head is body is still connected to the dangerous part.

trekkor 05-18-2009 09:46 AM

http://www.914club.com/bbs2/uploads/...1392_thumb.jpg

One of the lizards I saw in the back yard.


KT

gt350mike 05-18-2009 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T77911S (Post 4670167)
are you sure that one is dead? the head is body is still connected to the dangerous part.

It was still attached, but he had a problem with about 7k lbs on the back of his neck....the truck rolled over him.

I sent the photo to my dad's friend and he had to one-up me on the snake. Here is a photo that was taken about 50 miles from where he lives (Lake Oconee, GA). It was 9ft and was about 90+lbs.


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1242673524.jpg

Heel n Toe 05-18-2009 11:15 AM

Unless he can provide some sort of documentation on that snake, it probably isn't 9 ft. and 90 lbs.

Since the guy is holding it out towards the photographer, it does look bigger, but that's because of depth perception... and Eastern Diamondbacks rarely reach even 8 ft. and at that length weigh less than 30 lbs.

Heel n Toe 05-18-2009 11:20 AM

I decided to go hunting for "rattlesnake" entries at snopes.com...

http://www.snopes.com/photos/animals/txsnake.asp

http://www.snopes.com/photos/animals/georgiasnake.asp

http://www.snopes.com/photos/animals/claysnake.asp

gt350mike 05-18-2009 11:20 AM

30 lbs or 100 lbs, either way the end result is going to be the same.....dead!

I'll bust his chops on this one and make him dig-up some proof for us. He's retired so he has plenty of time to do the research.

gt350mike 05-18-2009 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heel n Toe (Post 4670480)

That one snake get's around! I'll forward the info.

Heel n Toe 05-18-2009 11:27 AM

"Maybe it’s blown out of proportion due to the camera lens. Kind of like when you catch a fish and you want your picture taken. You hold the fish as far out in front of you as possible to make it look bigger."

http://www.outdooroddities.com/2009/04/01/humongous-western-diamondback-rattle-snake/

Heel n Toe 05-18-2009 11:28 AM

http://www.nuggethunting.com/snake.jpg

T77911S 05-19-2009 04:44 AM

another king snake yesterday, thats 2 kings, one copper head, one gopher? and one grass snake this year.

Scooter 05-19-2009 07:02 AM

Photoshop is great!


http://www.nuggethunting.com/snake.jpg


Quote:

Originally Posted by gt350mike (Post 4670450)
It was still attached, but he had a problem with about 7k lbs on the back of his neck....the truck rolled over him.

I sent the photo to my dad's friend and he had to one-up me on the snake. Here is a photo that was taken about 50 miles from where he lives (Lake Oconee, GA). It was 9ft and was about 90+lbs.


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1242673524.jpg


Heel n Toe 05-19-2009 07:07 AM

Neither of those are Photoshopped... they're just holding the snake way out towards the camera.

You can hold a baseball in your hand with your arm outstretched toward the camera and make it look like it's the size of a basketball. That's all that's occurring here.

Was Bruce Lee's right hand bigger than his head?

http://i518.photobucket.com/albums/u...ruceleeeee.jpg

Tishabet 05-19-2009 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heel n Toe (Post 4672057)
Neither of those are Photoshopped... they're just holding the snake way out towards the camera.

It's the same snake in both pics

Heel n Toe 05-19-2009 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tishabet (Post 4672085)
It's the same snake in both pics

Hahahaha... it sure is... and in the photo of the guy with the blue shirt, some extra rattles have been Photoshopped on, too.

vash 05-19-2009 08:12 AM

i dont think anyone could hold 90 lbs out on a stick like that.

bums me out that people kill snakes just cuz they are snakes. every rattler i have encountered, i have just walked waaaaay around. no harm no foul.

T77911S 05-19-2009 08:38 AM

i have little kids in the yard. the girls also run around outside at night. i only kill the poisonous ones.

the lens makes a difference as to how much it will distort the image. a 35mm will make it worse than a 80mm, along with how close it is to the lens. look at what a wide angle will do.

GH85Carrera 05-19-2009 10:41 AM

I received a email about some 1800 lb wild boar just the other day. It was obvious the guy was 20 feet behind the pig. Same perspective thing.

Heel n Toe 05-19-2009 10:50 AM

I've seen those with the boar... heh heh... the guy should have been standing on top of it if he'd wanted to be convincing.

But I guess with Photoshop, even that wouldn't have been the final word on authenticity. :)

Joeaksa 05-19-2009 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lendaddy (Post 4651318)
I would have destroyed my head on the underside of the car, shat myself, then passed out.

Same here. .410 works well for those around where I live but then they are rattlesnakes and nothing to pick up and play with.

Joe A


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.