![]() |
Quote:
I'll even introduce you to one who broke his just tooling around on it. And he's not even a top rider. Steel can be repaired. Carbon...nope. Even if it's been deeply scratched its dumpster time. SmileWavy Then again, if I wanted a disposable rig I couldn't give two craps about in a crit, sure, I'd ride carbon. Looks and Times not withstanding, and the occasional Trek Madone, the rest is a yawner without the least bit of personality. Plus they sound terrible when going over ruts, bumps, reflectors in the road, etc. Every time I'm beside a carbon bike, they sound like they're falling apart. |
Quote:
http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/yourbusiness/story.html?id=2253a1ff-a288-45bf-9ada-e3ef22e91d56 It's all good...I guess. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I grew up riding and crashed many steel bikes. Why are we so caught up on steel? I like carbon. when I use to go out and beat my self up I had a bad habbit of always grabbing my Look 171 that I called the Jalabert special. I think slope top tube steel is just really ugly and so its some of the carbon. I would buy a Cervelo or Giant (had their 1st team alum. bike) if I was in the market for a bike. I have been out of the loop on bikes, is that Cannandale they are riding in the Tour carbon or are they still alum?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
if carbon was so brittle, they would be trashing bikes on P roubaix. i have one of the first postal bikes, the red white and blue one. been a good bike. i did have 2 other trek 5500 carbon frames. the first one i bought used. the chain stay got a small crack and trek warrantied it. got a new frame. the bottom bracket came lose, trek warrantied it. what sucked about that one is that i custom painted the frame myself. that says a lot for a company that stands behind their product. i bought a brand new giant before that. the wheel would not stay true, fought with for months. i had to pay part of the replacement. i did ride a cannondale for a while, it was a little more comfortable as far as fit. the C dale was a tad too big and my trek is a tad too small. one benefit from the carbon, besides weight, is how much it smoothes out the bumbs. at the end of a race, that can make a difference. dont get me wrong, i love the looks of steel, the waterford is an incredible bike, but the trek is what i have and ride. as far as weight, i would like to see the scales they are using. ive never been able to get my trek close to some of these proclaimed weights. maybe with no pedals, no bottle cages. i gave up on the weight thing years ago anyway. sometimes reliability and comfort have to take a front seat to weight. steel as far as feel- ^^^^^^^. carbon-~~~~~~~~~. not saying steel sucks, i would love to have a waterford. infact, i almost bought one, just a bit out of my price range. i talked with the guy at waterford. he was telling me they are one of the few companies that reynolds (?) let use the , i think was, 853? steel for the rear. triangle. that was a long time ago. trek was not even using that steel on the rear of the lemond. BTW, my first road bike was a schwinn, prelude. my MTB is a specialized steel frame. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1247744195.jpg 100 miles, the last 25 is ALL uphill except on 1 2 mile down section. |
I think it is going to be one of those days....
Turn on the idiot box to watch the tour on OLN and Shaw Cable have decided that I don't need to watch that channel anymore. It looks like satellite TV will be the way to go.... Edit: After having a cup of coffee and waking up a bit, it seems they moved the channel.... I guess I won't have to move to satellite TV just yet.... |
i never cared for the sloped top tubes either.
i do have a spare Cdale frame, i think it is a caad 5, the saeco frame. i got it as a spare from a friend after seeing i guy break his fork in a race. thank goodness i never needed it. never went down in a race. came very very close once or twice. caught my tires in a crack where the curb came down and joined the asphalt. pulled my left hand off the bars to catch me as i fell, but i stayed up, dont know how. |
I guess I'm at the opposite end of the spectrum. I really like the sloped tubes with the long seatpost. Then again, the size issue really crops up here. This works very nicely when your frame size is 47 to 49 centimeters like mine - apparently my legs barely reach the ground when I'm standing up... Not so good when you're a 6' guy!
For me carbon is a "ride and see" sort of thing. The material is incredibly tune able. You can get everything from stiff and harsh to flexible flier depending on the material and layup. When someone is in the market for a carbon bike, they really need to ride EXACTLY the model they are considering and never make a blanket assumption that carbon "rides" a particular way... I've had a series of aluminum bikes, all of them some version of stiff, harsh and buzzy on chipseal. The best upgrade I ever did was to go to a nice carbon fork. It was like a whole different machine. All the stiffness I like in the rear triangle but a little compliance in the front end and some nice vibration dampening. Sweet.... A couple of friends have newer Landsharks with a carbon rear triangle and a very high end columbus (forget which one) steel tubing on the main. Phenomenal... Light too. Out of my price range, but if money were not an object, I would be throwing down in that direction! :p This year's tour... Very, very interesting that the next to last stage is in the mountains. It could come down to an all the marbles or miss the podium race on that stage! angela |
If you know what you're doing, you can tune the ride of any bike. The last place I'd tune ride is in the frame. The first place is tire pressure. Tires are also the first place to add or subtract stiffness.
It doesn't matter how stiff a frame is if tire pressure is off. The first place to lose weight with a bicycle is in the wheels. It's also another place to add or subtract stiffness. So the whole "stiff frame" stuff might be a bit of a myth. Frame angle, wheelbase, chainstay length has as big a part in stiffness as material. I've heard plenty of guys who own steel bicycles by Pegoretti, Merckx and even the Schwinn-Serotta Ti say these frames are the stiffer than carbon. Personally, I think that's bad as every frame should have some compliance for handling purposes. That's where tire pressure comes in again. Quote:
Quote:
|
Here's my example of a good beat-em-up carbon frame.
http://www.bikesdirect.com/products/motobecane/centurycomp_08_carbon.htm It comes with parts, too. :D |
So, TdF standings stay basically the same today...
Wait until the Alps? |
i still use my old steel nishiki that my father bought at a yard sale and he fixed then when i worked at a bike shop i upgraded the brakes,bottom bracket, hubs,crank,handlebars,wheels, tires etc everything except the frame it looks like crap but I've put it up against other much more expensive bike's and it's faster and much more reliable.
and on the mtb side of things i still ride my fuji tahoe thats stock and it takes a beating like you wouldn't believe |
Quote:
It was awesome enough to give me the "brand loyalty" to go buy a newer-model Pinarello, which happens to be aluminum/carbon. I do like it - it's a great ride and it's very quick and responsive, but not quite the same "soul" as the steel one. I'll eventually get another I think. Either another Pinarello or a Colnago would be ideal. Preferably with Campy stuff. |
Was today's stage winner riding a Focus?
That was the first real mountain bike that I raced on. Tight rear triangle and steep angles on the seat and head tube. I loved that bike until I folded it up. It was pink, but it was called burnt purple... Good job I had the lungs to back it up back then. |
Quote:
|
Carbon bashing? Come on.....fantastic material.
Look, I should know, I ride an 73 steel Fuji single speed half the time, and an 07 Specialized Roubaix the other half. They both have their strong suits, but the frame on my Specialized is not just good, its GREAT. Laterally stiff, vertically smooth and comfortable, zero chatter....SO good. My dad drives one of the original Trek 5200 carbon frames as his triathlon bike! Its purple, before they went to USPS colors. Tens of thousands of miles, zero issues, rides like a dream. I like my steel, but I think you can bag the 'carbon bad' arguments, because that ship has sailed, its a superior material. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website