TR-3B: Myth or reality?
 

I was just wondering if this thing really exists. And if it does, the implications this has about advanced technology that is kept secret from us...

TR-3b
http://nomasmentiras.files.wordpress...ttech06_04.jpg

HELL YES! there all over arizona/nevada! where else do they test SECRET STUFF?

Many people have seen triangle type flying craft for many years, this would not suprise me.

The TR-3b came out just before the TR4 in the early 60's. It's an old design...







:)

I seriously doubt we have anything like that operational.

dammmm! that looks like my H20 steamer cleaner head!

along the same lines, Winslow was an eerie place to drive through at night ...

yep...had the TR4 2.1 engine instead of the 2.0 that was in the regular TR2/TR3. Although, as an option, you could still buy it with a 2.0 for racing.

;)

Is that one of those automatic robot vacuum cleaners?

It is a GD flying saucer

Here is the TR3 A, only one I could find
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1262141887.jpg

Typically faster in a straight line than the rival MG's, TR's had a following. MG folks of course liked to point out that they corner poorly!

Larry

The TR7 was the 1st TRUE OPERATIONAL TR... But alas, the wedge did not fare well in either the 7 or 8 configuration.

Some people have far too much free time and a few rocks loose in their noggin...

We have some very interesting things flying but not this one IMHO...

Do you really think they'd take the SR-71 out of service if they didn't have something to replace it?

thats just the line, i would expect from a secret agent like you. thinking we would get off your trail. and you thought you could fool us!

they do....satellites. however, they did bring the SR back in service after Sept. 11, 2001.

That's right, it's not a myth. From Toad Hall Cars:

1962 TRIUMPH TR 3B

One of the last ones of this series. Very nice restoration. This one has the 2138 cc 4 cylinder engine that goes next into the TR4s. Twin SU carbs and about 100 hp with a top speed of about 105 mph. The last Triumph model before being squared off on the door lines. In my eye, this and the Morgans are the classic Sporting Cars. Just fun to drive around in, solid and somewhat nimble.

http://www.toadhallcars.com/CarPhotosWeb/tr3.jpg

That chart has some of the worst mumbo-jumbo on it I've ever seen. Couple that with spelling errors and it looks like something a high school kid made up.

Nope, no way that a space based platform can reproduce everything that -71 did for us. There are only so many times that you can re-task a satellite then its time to send another one up, and the cost is far too high.

The SR-71 was removed from service because of some disagreements between several fractions in the Air Force/political ranks long before they had the assets to replace it.

The SR-71 always took off with gas tanks quasi empty because they were leaking on the runway before heat expansion of air friction sealed them at speed. It had to be refueled in flight just after taking off.

Funny...

"The mass of the circular accelerator and all mass within the accelerator, such as the crew capsule, avionics, MFD systems, fuels, crew environmental systems, and the nuclear reactor, are reduced by 89%. This causes the effect of making the vehicle extremely light and able to outperform and outmaneuver any craft yet constructed"

"What you have to remember is, that the 3 rocket engines only have to propel 11 percent of the mass of the Top Secret TR-3B. "

AHAHAAA! Lets see, rocket propulsion works be the equal reaction of sending mass away from you, so the rockets are 11% output for 100% of the work. SmileWavy You need a little more than nine times the rocket fuel here....

Not if the mass is reduced by 89%. The interesting question is can we do that?

No, but THEY can!:D

There are experiments and theories that suggest this could be doable:
Edit: watch it, Porsche contents at 4:22 !

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hiu4W27EQ_I&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hiu4W27EQ_I&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Y'all are missing the point: It has a GENERATOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D

You meant a GERERATOR ;).

There have been multiple sights of this craft, I do not think that part is questionable. The next question is: was it human made or not? One way or the other, the implications are mind boggling.

In a book by Dean Koontz called "the greys", there was an airship that was described very much like this. The premise was that it was derived from alien technology.In the book it was just called the TR. Interesting,if true.
John

I knew that technology was too brilliant to have been conceived by humans!:cool:

What's the big deal? Anti-gravity technology? This kind of technology has been around for millions of years according to Scientology. The galactic space ruler Xenu flew his captives in DC-8 space jets (except with rocket motors instead of jet engines) to earth to stack them around valcanoes and blow them up with nuclear bombs. If Xenu had vehicles like that 75 million years ago, I'm sure the Air Force can come up with something now. :D

But the BIG question is: Is Travolta type-rated in it?:D

Read carefully, this is not anti gravity technology! This is "mass reduction"

No mass

I think that plasma rings were first proposed to contain nuclear fusion reactions. We do not have commercial fusion reactors. Fusion would solve most if not all of our energy problems. This sure would change the world and political maps if we did.

Question is, if we had the ability to change the balance of the world with fusion, what forces ingrained interest would act to prevent such change?

Possible TR3B?

I do not know.

I do know that if the power brokers don't want us to have fusion, we won't.

The flying triangle is a toy compared to the technological implications it would have.

NOTE: under Bill Clinton's presidency a little experiment on the west coast was conducted. The experiment was the first real step towards controlled nuclear fusion. Control rods were removed without incident because of adjoining factors discovered. These factors were not known about by the Russians who thought if the Americans are doing this, we will beat them to the punch a day or two early. The result is known as the Chernobyl disaster. All funding on fusion was then terminated in the USA.

Physics Analysis Of TR-3B

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1262560504.jpg

Gotta be a TR ...dunno if it's a 3 or not...