You're called every name because you are defending a pedophile where there is no rational, reasonable defense.

None.

It makes you look VERY bad.

You're (again) clinging to total irrelevancies to explain why a FUGITIVE PEDOPHILE was justified. He's not, he's a rapist, he belongs in prison.

Dottore, if it makes you feel better, I had dinner with Denis, DD74 and Fxeditor in LA two weeks ago and we all agreed that you're someone who knows how to live. We didn't touch on the Polanski issue though.

too much talk

too much big words

get big rock

smash old french man and dottre

eat meat

sleep

That is a bit much.

I would not condone cracking Dot in the melon with a brick because of anything he said.

I would be interested to know what you could possibly have read to cause you to form such a twisted opinion on the matter Dottore.

I suspect he was trying to be funny. Kind of looks like he's going for the caveman thing.

You have to admit there's a lot of humor when bleeding liberals are involved. ;)

Especially when there is real blood involved. I mean, when someone, anyone, advocates the rape and buggering of a 13 year old girl, they must be sick along with the person doing the attacking. There simply is no way to see this in a positive light.

First, I'm sorry for the all the vitriol and insults that have been thrown at you. Those are the people who make justice difficult to achieve.
But back to the subject, what I see as corrupt is the fact that you can drug a 13 year old and bone her/him up the ass and "bargain" a 90 day sentence out of it, not the fact that somebody saw the light and said the bargain itself was a travesty of justice. I think several years in prison would be proportionate to the crime he committed.
This brings to light a bigger issue. People often avoid serious punishment for having sex with a child because it requires that the child testify, which can be as traumatic as the original attack. We need a system that does not even bring up the question of consent of the child. To protect children the only thing a judge needs to know is "did he/she do it." If the answer is yes - 25 years. No further questions or harassment of the child. It may be that a particular 13 year old is mature enough to give consent, but our biggest concern should be protecting the one's who aren't.

The "pedophile" (are you sure he's a pedophile?) that committed the crime is the criminal here, not Dottore.

Someone who defends or justifies a pedophile is just as bad as the pedo him/herself.

The American justice system outgrew that neaderthal idea a couple of hundred years ago. Keep up.

WTF does the justice system have to do with morality?

Oh and I did not know that despising pedophlia was neanderthal..

Looks like we have another child molester fan on the board!

Considering the number of posts he has, might even be Polanski himself!

Dot you have a boyfriend now! Hope he is young and not too fast :)

Joe A

(Who feels that child molestors should be taken out of the courthouse and SHOT in the gut and left to bleed to death)

Obviously he is a pedophile. He's bragged about it, actually.

One has to wonder if they belong to the same club????
No reasonable person defends the action of a child molestor

Dammit Byron, now you have brought NAMBLA into the mix.

Am guessing that Dot and -15 are board of directors members of this motley crew and will now threaten us with lawsuits and bondage! Course we are too old for their tastes so should be safe from any buggering, but you never know.

I guess this will have to be "OJ" justice, where he gets off, but lives in his own personal hell & gets in trouble for something else, also not being able to come back to the states and hollywood lifestyle must be killing him, hopefully....

Just in...Swiss deny U.S. extradition request...Polanski freed from house arrest. Swiss blame it on failure of U.S. to provide info on 1977 sentencing.o

Swiss are saying that they only do this if the sentenance is over six months in duration. WTF?

Did not know you could run from the law for 30 years then get away from it like this!

The US failed to provide this info, because it would have shown that Polanski had in fact served his full sentence as agreed in his plea bargain. To now disclose this information would have shown the world how corrupt and capricious the US courts can be. And the Americans didn't want to look any stupider than they already do.

The US has a third world judicial system, and the Swiss refusal to extradite Polanski clearly reflects this fact.

I had dinner with some senior Swiss lawyers a couple of months ago, who said that the fact that Polanski was even arrested in Switzerland at all was considered a "national tragedy" by almost all members of the Swiss bar.

So I suggest you guys need to get over this, like everyone else has long ago. If you want to do something useful, work on reforming your deeply flawed, legal judicial and penal institutions and processes.