![]() |
David, I think it is a bit of a logistics issue to repave Mulholland. It is such an artery, that traffic to and from the Valley to the City would come to a stand still. Unfortunately, the road was not designed to handle the type of traffic it sees today. I imagine the city twiddling their thumbs over how to repave an fix Mulholland, without causing major traffic issues. I would not be surprised if they come to the same conclusion each time.... There is no way to repave Mul and keep traffic moving.
My thoughts, who knows... |
Nice drive, too bad…
But hay Arnold is rich and he needs a nice road to wind out his Tesla? |
Quote:
|
Whoops... The weather and age was implied. My bad.
|
Quote:
You really don't know what you're talking about when it comes to L.A., do you? :cool: |
Quote:
Sure, Mulholland may take longer to repair/repave. But look at it now: it's already closed, and traffic still flows via other arteries. So I can't see how closing it for repair would be any different. Motorists just need advance warning, or to be stunned once with horrific traffic. They learn afterward to find and take an alternate route. Repair/repave is totally possible, IMO. |
It just happens that the current damage is not at a critical part of Mulholland. You can't just repave that road. At some point, one or more critical areas of Mulholland will collapse and he City will be forced to deal with the problem. Mulholland is at the top of a mountain, mountains erode.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website