Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Runaway Prius - Why did the brakes not work? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/530195-runaway-prius-why-did-brakes-not-work.html)

HarryD 03-10-2010 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Langers (Post 5228822)
It's become apparent to me that most people in this thread are well behind on technology and the benefits of fly by wire throttle.

Fly by wire throttle and computer controlled engine management allows manufacturers to optimally balance performance, efficiency and emissions through the implementation of complex systems, such as variable valve timing and variable inlet manifolds. These kinds of systems, along with direct injection, are what allows Porsche and other manufacturers to create 100hp/l+ N/A engines, with flat torque curves. Efficiency, performance and driveability increases when these systems are properly implemented.

As an example, when you're low in the rev range and you push the throttle pedal down half way, you're not getting 50% throttle plate opening but rather 50% of available engine torque at that speed. The computer will work out the fuel, ignition and air for you to achieve the most efficient outcome.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with properly tuned drive-by-wire throttles, and it seems that it is only the techno-phobic who do not approve.

I totally agree that drive-by-wire is perfectly acceptable. No matter the system, throttle controls break, get stuck and otherwise misbehave.

You need to have non-computer mediated safeguards to allow the driver to bypass the system to gain control in a fail safe mode. This is not a failure of Drive-by-wire, per se, but the failure by the system designer to provide the driver an affirmative way to override the the computer when things go badly wrong.

Quote:

Other than Toyota, none else I know of has had any failures, and most cars have failsafes in place to cut the throttle when brakes are applied (e.g. my R32).
Exactly.

Langers 03-10-2010 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m21sniper (Post 5229844)
No thanks. I'll have a regular old throttle cable and brake pedal and steering box please.

I don't -ever- want that mechanical link severed in any vehicle i operate. Sorry.

Provide one logical, well reasoned argument why drive by wire throttle is overall a negative development for the automotive industry.

m21sniper 03-10-2010 10:44 PM

Explain one reason why a mechanical fail safe throttle cable and TPS sensor is not perfectly suitable to begin with.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckissick (Post 5229867)
I've had that mechanical link severed on my old VWs I've owned - a common problem. But the car just stops when that happens.

Yep.

Langers 03-10-2010 11:32 PM

Quote:

Explain one reason why a mechanical fail safe throttle cable and TPS sensor is not perfectly suitable to begin with.<br>
<br>
<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: bbcode_quote -->
<div class="pre-quote">
Quote de <strong>ckissick</strong>
</div>

<div class="post-quote">
<div style="font-style:italic">I've had that mechanical link severed on my old VWs I've owned - a common problem. But the car just stops when that happens.</div>
</div>
<!-- END TEMPLATE: bbcode_quote -->Yep.
Because means that the throttle plate cannot operate independently of the throttle pedal, which means that all the advanced cam and inlet
manifold trickery is far less effective that it would be if the computer had the ability to control the throttle plate response curve in conjunction with other parameters to deliver requested torque rather than simply requested throttle opening.

Safety, economy and performance would suffer.

m21sniper 03-11-2010 12:10 AM

There are plenty of cars with throttle cables that excel in performance and economy. I discount your claim.

What's more, i don't want the throttle plate moving independent of my input. My input is the only input i care about, and the only input i want in control.

Period.

red-beard 03-11-2010 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Langers (Post 5229927)
Because means that the throttle plate cannot operate independently of the throttle pedal, which means that all the advanced cam and inlet
manifold trickery is far less effective that it would be if the computer had the ability to control the throttle plate response curve in conjunction with other parameters to deliver requested torque rather than simply requested throttle opening.

Safety, economy and performance would suffer.

I can buy the economy and performance arguments, but how does safety suffer?

Langers 03-11-2010 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red-beard (Post 5229948)
I can buy the economy and performance arguments, but how does safety suffer?

Makes it much more difficult to implement traction control and ESP systems and other things like automatic transmission winter / ice modes etc.

Langers 03-11-2010 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by m21sniper (Post 5229947)
There are plenty of cars with throttle cables that excel in performance and economy. I discount your claim.

What's more, i don't want the throttle plate moving independent of my input. My input is the only input i care about, and the only input i want in control.

Period.

You sure as hell weren't in the debating team at school were you?

m21sniper 03-11-2010 01:33 AM

I am not debating you, i am simply stating my position.

By the way, no. I was Captain of the Chess team.

Jim Richards 03-11-2010 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Langers (Post 5229985)
Makes it much more difficult to implement traction control and ESP systems and other things like automatic transmission winter / ice modes etc.

I'd be quite happy without them. The more things we make the cars do for us, the more often drivers feel like they can do other things like talk on the phone, text, play video games, eat cheeseburgers, etc.

Brando 03-11-2010 04:16 AM

Langers... How is it good to not be in control of the vehicle's operation?

Isn't that why Toyota is in this mess? The throttle is not manually controlled in the first place, leading to a safety issue?

You keep stating that efficiency, performance and safety will suffer. Can you back those claims up? So far we (general knowledge now) that not being able to control the throttle or brakes is a safety problem.

pksystems 03-11-2010 04:47 AM

Here's a nifty solution... use the brakes for stopping the car. NOTHING ELSE.

pksystems 03-11-2010 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RANDY P (Post 5229205)
Would you get on an airplane that was entirely by - wire with no backup systems? Why should a car be any different?

rjp

Most new planes are. :p Lose the computer, you can lose control of the entire plane.

vash 03-11-2010 08:36 AM

i drive a toyota..but i cannot call myself a FAN, like i am a porsche 911 fan. just a truck to me. it works.

anyways, is there any possible way this fool is faking it? i mean, his timing couldnt be better. toyota is about to fall on the sword and all. hell, he does this in SF traffic and he would be in a rearender. even his timing in traffic is pretty good.

BGCarrera32 03-11-2010 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Richards (Post 5230054)
I'd be quite happy without them. The more things we make the cars do for us, the more often drivers feel like they can do other things like talk on the phone, text, play video games, eat cheeseburgers, etc.

Then stop electing a government that insists on mandating every conceivable area of our lives, removing any personal responsibility in the process. We have 49 air bags in the car, traction control, rollover sensors, 35 mpg and it has to survive a 7 story fall, and on and on because...

You get the government YOU deserve.

Automotive Digest: NHTSA Mandates Electronic Stability Control by 2012

island911 03-11-2010 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pksystems (Post 5230095)
Most new planes are. :p Lose the computer, you can lose control of the entire plane.

Which plane relies solely on one computer?

dd74 03-11-2010 09:20 AM

Ridiculous. Forget about having a dual-purpose street/track car if stability control is mandated.

Time to buy that Formula Ford, and buy "whatever" else to drive to work and elsewhere.

cgarr 03-11-2010 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by island911 (Post 5230502)
Which plane relies solely on one computer?

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QfVAetzC8W4&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QfVAetzC8W4&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

island911 03-11-2010 09:42 AM

LOL :D

Did the mouse survive?

widebody911 03-11-2010 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pksystems (Post 5230095)
Most new planes are. :p Lose the computer, you can lose control of the entire plane.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1268332860.jpg


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.