That depends on the "movies" your seeing ;) lol...

IMO, the movie looks much better than the series, which I thought was rock stupid.

Otherwise, I'll see it for Sharlto Copley's acting...

http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/t...a7/1472191.jpg

+1

Between this (recycled TV show), "Marmaduke (recycled comic), "Sex in the City 2" (a SEQUEL of a recycled TV show), "Prince of Persia" (recycled video game), "Iron Man 2" (sequel of a recycled comic), "Robin Hood" (classic story that's been remade and re-interpreted about 50,000 times already) is there nothing that Hollywood can't overkill, beat to death, reuse, remake, recycle or re-adapt in order to avoid having to hire some writing talent?

Last movie I saw was "Up" (which was great). I think we're down to about two or three a year now.

:eek: Whaaa? Are you serious?

The series was basically aimed at 7-15 year old kids. Evidently you missed the point.

We watched the series almost every week with our boys and had a blast.

It's just supposed to be fun... look somewhere else to satisfy your discriminating filmgoer taste for excellence.

Good grief Ducky... I pity you, fool. :rolleyes:

The local paper verdict: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/suppo...leys/shake.gif

'A-Team' a confusing mess of multiple plots

I liked this quote: "Lt. Templeton "Faceman" Peck, played by Bradley Cooper. A graduate of the Matthew McConaughey school, Mr. Cooper's idea of acting mostly involves taking off his shirt and grinning."

Well... I'm sure it won't be up to the cinematic excellence transformers was... :D

Some movies are supposed to be stupid fun.

I also will see this as a $1 redbox rental when the wife is out of town just like "Ninja assassin"