Laneco |
11-09-2010 12:59 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwd72s
(Post 5664341)
Angela, I disagree here...I once served on a board with other political activists, an initiative effort to reduce property taxes. As such, we were exposed to the Oregon press. They have no morals, would hurt their own mothers if they thought there was a story in it. They are masters of taking statements out of context, half truths, etc. The "Journalists" have agendas, never think they don't.
When we won Measure 5, I dropped out...to this day, if I see a reporter or a TV camera, I get as far away as possible.
|
Actually, I think we agree, Paul. A person entrusted to report the news should do so, fairly and without bias, and should confirm all sources for authenticity. I for one like to think I am intelligent enough to make my own decision when presented unbiased facts. I want news, not a gossip column. Clearly, as in the case of Thayer, journalists do not always (often) hold themselves to a professional standard. Sound bites, out of content verbage and the over riding theory that if it bleeds, it leads, dominates modern so called journalism.
If Thayer had provided his opinion with fact, then it would be investigative journalistm. This is clearly nothing more than mud-slinging that will cost the athlete any realistic chance at a Heisman. Further, Thayer's writing isn't all that good. THe fact that he has nothing substantial to say save the weight of his own pompous opinion is clearly evident. There are much better writers here on Pelican.
angela
|