![]() |
Reagan approach, American heavy on final?
Hello, WTF, How could someone get locked out of the tower, have you been locked out of your office? Is there only one person in the tower at that hour of the morning. And over Bam Bam's house as well.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/us/25airport.html?src=mv |
Definitely shouldn't have Mexican food for dinner when you're alone in the tower, I'm thinking. Wow!
|
I am sure there will be hell to pay for the ATC guy, but landing at an uncontrolled airport is no big deal.... probably 99% of all my thousands of landings have been without a control tower.
|
Very true, you and I know that but the public doesn't get the same understanding of the situation.
Just heard LaHood is now assigning a second controller for the graveyard shift. Don't think there are many scheduled flights into Reagan after midnight, so now there will be two azzhats sleeping. |
Common sense dictates at least two. What if the guy has to really go to the can?
|
you put on "In-a-Gadda-da-Vida", then hit the head.
oh wait, that's for radio DJ, not ATC. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They suspended the super on duty.....yeah right. The bean counter that cut the second duty guy is the one who should be kicked in the ass.
|
Quote:
People in PARF gotta think about what gets cut when they scream that thegovernment needs xx percent across the board cuts. All sorts of things get cut. |
"Fortunately, at no point was either plane out of radar contact, and our back-up system kicked in to ensure the safe landing of both airplanes.”?
What is the "back-up system?" |
|
This is really not a big deal IMO. As pilot I am required to make contact with ATC prior to entering controlled airspace. If I cannot make contact (happens sometimes when small aircraft call into busy control towers at large airports), I simply cannot enter that particular airspace. These pilots were cleared into the airspace by another ATC controller and landed safely. ATC do not land the airplanes for pilots, they basically are there to maintain seperation at busy airports. Reagan is obviously not busy at night. Two airplanes approaching an airport to land that are communicating on a common frequency is not unsafe by any stretch of the imagination. and happens hundreds of times daily at uncontrolled airports and at controlled airports that are not staffed at night.
|
Quote:
I thought this was cute, certainly cheaper than paying for 2nd ATC. “I am not sure the answer is to have multiple heartbeats at a time of the day when nothing is happening,” said Robert W. Mann Jr., an aviation industry expert in Port Washington, N.Y. “You might have well have a dog in the tower along with the controller. The dog could bite the controller if he fell asleep.” |
I was in the crew lounge yesterday morning between flights when I saw the report on one of the news channels. My first thought was what the heck was the local tower manager thinking when he decided to staff the tower with ONE controller? Something like this is almost inevitable with only person in there - at night, with almost nothing going on.
The guys are right about "uncontrolled" landings. It's no big deal, and in fact is the most common sort of landing in aviation - by a long shot. |
Quote:
|
Anyone come in no radio using the light gun?
|
Quote:
|
BBC NEWS | Europe | Silence for slain air controller
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3728541.stm Quote:
|
I had heard there are only 2 or 3 flights after midnight into DCA, why pay two people to sleep. I agree two are essential when there is activity.
As Garp demonstrated in the previous post, one was at post and one was on break. They still fuched it up! |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website