Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Shell Is Building the World's Largest Man-Made Floating Object (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/610132-shell-building-worlds-largest-man-made-floating-object.html)

enzo1 05-22-2011 07:21 PM

Shell Is Building the World's Largest Man-Made Floating Object
 
http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-05/harvest-natural-gas-ocean-shell-building-worlds-largest-man-made-floating-objecthttp://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1306120898.jpg

rsNINESOOPER 05-22-2011 07:51 PM

I hope they get the entire sinking on camera and I can't wait to hear the BS reasons along with why the government should foot the rescue and clean up costs.

disaster waiting to happen-

BRPORSCHE 05-22-2011 07:58 PM

wow, what an awful post rsninpooper. go figure you are from the Bay Area with liberal spew like that.

MotoSook 05-23-2011 04:41 AM

Feel free to turn off the light and start gathering wood in your rustic haven where natural resources are off limits.

And you might. As well stop diving and buy a good pair of shoes. Don't think about using the roads to walk on....them roads are paved with asphalt!

Quote:

I hope they get the entire sinking on camera and I can't wait to hear the BS reasons along with why the government should foot the rescue and clean up costs.<br>
<br>
disaster waiting to happen-

Porsche-O-Phile 05-23-2011 04:56 AM

"Too big to fail"?

"Unsinkable"

Potential hubris, I'll grant that much. Cool project though. Most likely it'll never have any problems. Kudos to Shell for pushing the limits of engineering technology!

sm70911 05-23-2011 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rsNINESOOPER (Post 6038419)
I hope they get the entire sinking on camera and I can't wait to hear the BS reasons along with why the government should foot the rescue and clean up costs.

disaster waiting to happen-

Exactly. Typical short sighted energy company. Cue handwringing and hand outs when something bad happens. Its ridiculous to build something like this, and impossible to forsee every potential natural disaster.
Shell, BP, et al should be putting their money into creating extensive renewable energy resources.

GH85Carrera 05-23-2011 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sm70911 (Post 6038698)
Exactly. Typical short sighted energy company. Cue handwringing and hand outs when something bad happens. Its ridiculous to build something like this, and impossible to forsee every potential natural disaster.
Shell, BP, et al should be putting their money into creating extensive renewable energy resources.

Like plant trees?

What are you going to put in your gas tank? Those pesky laws of nature demand that it takes a LOT of energy to move the 4,000 lb climate controlled vehicle down the road at 70 mph. Wishing for an magic alternative is nice but it will leave you with a stationary vehicle. There is no viable alternative.

sammyg2 05-23-2011 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rsNINESOOPER (Post 6038419)
I hope they get the entire sinking on camera and I can't wait to hear the BS reasons along with why the government should foot the rescue and clean up costs.

disaster waiting to happen-

Stoopid post.
I suppose you hypocrites walk or ride bicycles everywhere you go and don't own an internal combustion engine, and everything else you own is made from wood or wool or cotton?

sammyg2 05-23-2011 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sm70911 (Post 6038698)
Exactly. Typical short sighted energy company. Cue handwringing and hand outs when something bad happens. Its ridiculous to build something like this, and impossible to forsee every potential natural disaster.
Shell, BP, et al should be putting their money into creating extensive renewable energy resources.

Another stoopid post made by someone with absolutely no knowledge of the subject.

red-beard 05-23-2011 05:45 AM

Reading comprehension!

This is an Australian project.

If the front falls off, it will simply go out of the environment...



















<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/8-QNAwUdHUQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

ckissick 05-23-2011 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sm70911 (Post 6038698)
Typical short sighted energy company. ... impossible to forsee every potential natural disaster.

Wow. Short sighted? This is the opposite of short sighted. It's designed to withstand a category 5 typhoon. What other natural disaster at sea is there? Until they invent a category 6, I'd say they're prepared.

It's this attitude that would see us still living in caves, huddled around a campfire every night. Actually, scrap the camp fire. Something could happen.

GH85Carrera 05-23-2011 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckissick (Post 6038778)
Wow. Short sighted? This is the opposite of short sighted. It's designed to withstand a category 5 typhoon. What other natural disaster at sea is there? Until they invent a category 6, I'd say they're prepared.

It's this attitude that would see us still living in caves, huddled around a campfire every night. Actually, scrap the camp fire. Something could happen.

You should not have a campfire, that causes pollution and will destroy the enviroment!

dlockhart 05-23-2011 06:18 AM

The Objective Standard: Exploit the Earth or Die™

Exploit the Earth or die. It’s not a threat. It’s a fact. Either man takes the Earth’s raw materials—such as trees, petroleum, aluminum, and atoms—and transforms them into the requirements of his life, or he dies. To live, man must produce the goods on which his life depends; he must produce homes, automobiles, computers, electricity, and the like; he must seize nature and use it to his advantage. There is no escaping this fact. Even the allegedly “noble” savage must pick or perish. Indeed, even if a person produces nothing, insofar as he remains alive he indirectly exploits the Earth by parasitically surviving off the exploitative efforts of others.

The fact annoys some people


http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/...-the-earth.gif

MotoSook 05-23-2011 07:19 AM

The fact that they are putting all the facilities at the source should make the greenies happy as hell...no pipeline and facilities on shore.

The Asian countries need the LNG...or they can substitute with fission...now a taboo thought.

Or I guess they can go back to the 1700's and burn wood and get around on feet or horses.

island911 05-23-2011 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rsNINESOOPER (Post 6038419)
I hope they get the entire sinking on camera and I can't wait to hear the BS reasons ....

disaster waiting to happen-

Maybe you also hope an A380 falls out of the sky too...and they get the entire downing on camera.

:rolleyes:

What a great 'reality' you must live in.

island911 05-23-2011 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soukus (Post 6038901)
The fact that they are putting all the facilities at the source should make the greenies happy as hell.......

Yeah, but the GreenPeacers are now gunna need a bigger rubber raft... ;)

sammyg2 05-23-2011 07:35 AM

Since the tree-huggers have killed nukes again, that's out.
Solar costs waaaaay too much, so does the wind power scam.


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1306164402.jpg


Natural gas is extremely cheap compared to the "alternative energy" scams and it's much cleaner than most energy sources.
But believe it or not there are plenty of people out there who like the idea of our electricity bills quadrupling.
They like that idea, because they know the bleeding heart liberal gubmint will make SOMEONE ELSE pay their bills for them.
They have no idea how incredibly expensive and inneficient and unreliable their "alternative energy" sources are, and they don't care. They've been told to like them no matter what and that's exactly what they will do.

They must also like the idea of only having electricity available when the sun is shining or the wind is blowing. Wonder how they's think about that if they or one of their loved ones were hooked up to a life support system?

Bah, it's simply a liberal knee-jerk reaction to a name associated with an oil company.
They've been PROGRAMMED to react negatively to the mere mention of an oil comany's name without any thought whatsoever.

Zeke 05-23-2011 07:54 AM

I thought the world's biggest floating object was the trash island out in the Pacific.

rsNINESOOPER 05-23-2011 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BRPORSCHE (Post 6038432)
wow, what an awful post rsninpooper. go figure you are from the Bay Area with liberal spew like that.


Interesting way to donate your thoughts. Your a big man on the keyboard.

First of all I am not a "liberal" as you have titled me and secondly being from the bay area has nothing to do with what kind of person I am. There are a few people like you on this site that seem to drag politics into everything no matter what the subject. Do you speak like this when you are in the personal presence of people?.

I could argue with you on the internet but that would be idiotic. You may continue your plight alone.

My comment is coming from an engineering viewpoint and and not one of the need to develop energy. I happen to understand energy in much greater detail than you might think. So ignoring what the "purpose" is of the largest floating structure being built is I think it's a ridiculous idea. Engineering wise it begs disaster weather created by nature or man which has been proven to plague Oil and gas projects due to the materials handled and remote locations they are built in.

slakjaw 05-23-2011 08:43 AM

But... ur the one who brought politics into this thread.

oh well, it was fun guys my guess is that this will be off to PARF soon. SmileWavy

Quote:

Originally Posted by rsNINESOOPER (Post 6039058)
Interesting way to donate your thoughts. Your a big man on the keyboard.

First of all I am not a "liberal" as you have titled me and secondly being from the bay area has nothing to do with what kind of person I am. There are a few people like you on this site that seem to drag politics into everything no matter what the subject. Do you speak like this when you are in the personal presence of people?.

I could argue with you on the internet but that would be idiotic. You may continue your plight alone.

My comment is coming from an engineering viewpoint and and not one of the need to develop energy. I happen to understand energy in much greater detail than you might think. So ignoring what the "purpose" is of the largest floating structure being built is I think it's a ridiculous idea. Engineering wise it begs disaster weather created by nature or man which has been proven to plague Oil and gas projects due to the materials handled and remote locations they are built in.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.