AirKuhl |
08-05-2011 09:28 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdfifteen
(Post 6178485)
The government has to decide whether it cares about public health or not. "Eat what you want, ride your Harley without a helmet, smoke cigarettes, the government doesn't care," and "The law says ER's must treat everyone who shows up," are two contradictory policies. Which one should we follow?
|
You treat the person because we aren't heartless, but we also do a much better job of making them pay afterwards, like any other loan. And yes, we absorb the rest as a cost of living in a society.
But your train of thought is a good one to follow. How far are you willing to allow the government to tell you what you are allowed to do for your own good? Wear a helmet? Smoke? Drink alcohol? Eat red meat? Drive a fast car? Premarital sex? Mountain climbing? Limit TV and computer time per day? Watching or reading materials not pre-approved by the government until they can verify the content won't encourage you to engage is what they determine is risky behavior?
I agree with Supe, it's pretty easy to make excellent, cheap food at home, it just takes time and planning. Buy some bulk items, a slow cooker, a freezer and some plastic bags. You can make a month's worth of "TV Dinners" in one Sunday. But that takes a bit of effort and planning, two items far more rare than money amongst much of our "poor".
|