Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Weather Temp Records (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/687501-weather-temp-records.html)

daepp 07-06-2012 09:27 AM

Weather Temp Records
 
I am no statistician, but every day we learn new temperature records are broken.

But if we add new days to the total number of days in the "population", won't we always be setting new records - both highs and lows?

IOW, don't our records only go back around one hundred years?

Zeke 07-06-2012 09:29 AM

While looking at record low temps for 7/4 I saw in the LATimes that the record low was 46 in 1900.

Thomas Jefferson took the temp twice a day and logged it.

Joe Bob 07-06-2012 09:31 AM

Official records, 1914....amateur records 1766-ish. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007...her.features11

daepp 07-06-2012 09:32 AM

But still, we don't know the history of all the actual highs and lows for the earth, so we really don't know today if they're records or not.

Zeke 07-06-2012 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAEpperson (Post 6842640)
But still, we don't know the history of all the actual highs and lows for the earth, so we really don't know today if they're records or not.

So, what's the point? We don't know a lot about the ancient earth's day to day's conditions. If it happened in my lifetime, it's a personal record. ;)

sc_rufctr 07-06-2012 09:45 AM

Apparently there are other ways of measuring temperatures from the past.
Things like different algae sizes frozen in glaciers. The bigger the algae the warmer the temperature.

Realistically these methods are inheriantly inaccurate compared to modern thermometers etc but climate sientists put a lot of effort into getting things right.
That doesn't mean they are though.

Locally it seems we've gone the other way. Remembering back to childhood...
Our winters seem longer/colder and our summers are brutal but brief.

Personally. I Think things are changing... How? I don't know but this is a very short time frame.

daepp 07-06-2012 09:45 AM

In my inarticulate way, I guess what I am trying to say is that record setting temps are insignificant because as we add additional days to the total population of days we will always have more records. No?

widebody911 07-06-2012 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAEpperson (Post 6842685)
In my inarticulate way, I guess what I am trying to say is that record setting temps are insignificant because as we add additional days to the total population of days we will always have more records. No?

Just like sports. If enough time passes, someone else will come along who can jump higher, run faster, eat more hot dogs, do more 'roids, etc.

Zeke 07-06-2012 09:52 AM

Just like the Olympics. I still don't get it.

Peter, yes we do know about periods. How do we know what the highs and lows were from year to year? Anomalies occur. Maybe it was over 130 (134 in 1913) in Death Valley once in awhile. Doesn't tell us much.

Joe Bob 07-06-2012 09:55 AM

Ice core samples can give an overall picture of temps but nothing local like say, BFE or Schenectady, NY.

island911 07-06-2012 10:03 AM

Ice cores.. People make assumptions like 'the earth has always rotated about the same axis' (it hasn't). ...or that a day is always 24hrs (it's not)

For example; Here is a cool picture showing the drift of the Tropic of Cancer. (earth tilt)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...m_27%2B800.jpg

And then there's that shifting magnetic field....

red-beard 07-06-2012 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Bob (Post 6842700)
Ice core samples can give an overall picture of temps but nothing local like say, BFE or Schenectady, NY.

JB, What do you know of Schenectigrad?

Joe Bob 07-06-2012 10:58 AM

Beyond that it's in NY....Bubkis.

motion 07-06-2012 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 6842663)
So, what's the point? We don't know a lot about the ancient earth's day to day's conditions. If it happened in my lifetime, it's a personal record. ;)

The point is that it gives the media & statisticians a data point to enter into a column. To say that yesterday was a record high or low is both ignorant and arrogant. At some point in history the temperature has been warmer or cooler than yesterday a bazillion times.

motion 07-06-2012 11:25 AM

And comparing this century's data with last century's, or 1,000 centuries ago is meaningless. The earth is constantly changing and evolving. Not too long ago, most of North America was buried under ice. The earth does not care that humans are here. Within the blink of an eye, we will be gone and the earth will continue along just fine.

daepp 07-06-2012 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by motion (Post 6842830)
The point is that it gives the media & statisticians a data point to enter into a column. To say that yesterday was a record high or low is both ignorant and arrogant. At some point in history the temperature has been warmer or cooler than yesterday a bazillion times.

Yes - thank you. You said it better with less words!

jyl 07-06-2012 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAEpperson (Post 6842685)
In my inarticulate way, I guess what I am trying to say is that record setting temps are insignificant because as we add additional days to the total population of days we will always have more records. No?

What you say makes no sense.

You don't add up the temperature on successive days, which sounds like what you're thinking about.

Look at it this way. You measure the temp of your refrigerator, set thermostat at 34F and you never open the door. Day 1, the temp ranges from 28F to 45F as the fridge settles down to a stable temp. On days 2 and future days, temp ranges from 30F to 36F. You can go on as long as you like, there will never be another high record or low record set. Even through you are adding extra days to the "population" in yourspeak.

jyl 07-06-2012 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by motion (Post 6842840)
And comparing this century's data with last century's, or 1,000 centuries ago is meaningless. The earth is constantly changing and evolving. Not too long ago, most of North America was buried under ice. The earth does not care that humans are here. Within the blink of an eye, we will be gone and the earth will continue along just fine.

This works if you are indifferent to your own existence and that of your children and their children and everyone else.

motion 07-06-2012 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jyl (Post 6842902)
This works if you are indifferent to your own existence and that of your children and their children and everyone else.

Humans will always adapt. The fact that we are still here is the proof :)

island911 07-06-2012 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jyl (Post 6842902)
This works if you are indifferent to your own existence and that of your children and their children and everyone else.

what he said is not indifference. ..it's acceptance. Sure, you can delude yourself into thinking that 'man' can control such things ...stop change.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.