![]() |
Colt is Back...
I've been hearing for some time now that Colt has pretty much gotten their act back together with regards to the quality of their Single Action Army revolvers. They had let it slip a bit over the last decade or so, with the company going through some ownership and leadership changes. They had been concentrating on military sales to the detriment of their civilian market, and it was really showing.
As a matter of fact, for quite some time now, many fans of the single action have been resorting to buying clones from the likes of United States Firearms, who provide a top notch gun by any measure. Many have even gone so far as to suggest Colt turn the manufacture of their single actions over to USFA under license (who, ironically, build their guns in the old Colt factory, under "the Dome"). USFA had gotten that good, and Colt had gotten that bad. Well, I'm happy to confirm what I had been hearing for the last couple of years - Colt quality is back. I was in one of my favorite gun shops yesterday, poking around for Christmas presents and whatnot (mainly just killing a rainy Saturday) when the proprietor spied me from across the shop. He called me over, just grinning ear to ear, saying "you gotta see this...". "This" was a brand new production 5 1/2" SAA in .45 Colt. He knew I would be hooked the moment I saw it. He was right. I bought it on the spot after a cursory inspection, and thumbing the hammer back a few times. The action is every bit as nice and smooth as several of my much older "tuned" Peacemakers. The fit and finish is the best I've ever seen on a production revolver, bar none. Pictures don't do it justice, but I'll try. I've included the last brand new Colt I bought, sometime back in the early to mid '90's, before quality started to slip. The finish on the brand new one is head and shoulders above even what is acknowledged as a "good" third generation gun. So, here is the new 5 1/2" sitting side by side with about a 20 year old 4 3/4". http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1355696451.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1355696472.jpg I'm excited. If it shoots a good as it looks (and there is no reason why it shouldn't), that will be the final confirmation (to me at least) that Colt is back in the game on my all-time favorite gun. |
I read about the New Frontier recently and started to covet it immediately! Nice to see Colt rising again
Troy |
I've seen several New Frontiers in local gun shops. They either don't get snatched up as fast as the SAA's, or they are making more of them. I bet they are making more of them, even though there is less demand for them.
Colt is funny that way, and it kind of pisses me off. They have consistently held Peacemaker production to just under market demand for as long as I can remember. They are doing their best to keep the damn things just scarce enough to maintain some false aura of "specialness" and/or "mystique" about them. Granted, they have always been better in fit and finish than the average handgun, even when folks were complaining about them. Now that they are back on their game again, they are truly exceptional. And yes, there is a good deal more machining and subsequent hand fitting required of its antiquated design - it's by no means "designed for manufacture" to anywhere near the degree of, say, a Ruger Blackhawk with all of its investment cast parts. There is all of that, but most of us are convinced that Colt artificially keeps production below what it could be. Word on the street is that they are going to reduce Peacemaker production next year, now that they are getting it right again. Gotta keep 'em "exclusive" for the collectors, I guess. :rolleyes: Oh well, maybe that just means they are planning on firing up the Python line again... one can only hope... |
Beautiful! Congrats!
|
Thanks, Art. This one was truly "love at first sight". I'm actually really not all that fond of the 5 1/2" barrel length, considering it to be "neither fish nor fowl", but this one really really caught my eye. I just couldn't let it get away. Now if it would only quit raining long enough to get out and shoot it...
|
will the Python come back?
|
I sure hope so, Vash. I sold my last one over 20 years ago before they started to skyrocket in value, and now I'm reluctant to lay out the cash for a used one. The one I sold was a late 1970's manufacture and, to be honest, I couldn't see what all the fuss was about.
I've since handled and fired (but have not owned) earlier examples, and having done that, I can see where they built their reputation. The problem is, though, those early Pythons demand a premium. Not quite early Peacemaker money, but a fair chunk of change nonetheless. If I'm spending that kind of money on a wheelgun, I would prefer it to be a single action. Now if they started producing them again at about the price of the new SAA, with the same level of quality, I would be all over one. We'll have to wait and see. |
thanks jeff..thanks for the update. i thought they went the way of the Dodo. for good.
this is good news. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Very nice looking! Glad to see their quality return.
|
Quote:
The idea that if it's an old Colt it must be worth something has really infected the market. When I was a kid in the '60's and early '70's, my dad and uncles had SAA's because they were cheap old guns that nobody really wanted. A lot of "bang for the buck" so to speak. I sure wish I had a few of those now; except for my dad's, I have no idea what ever happened to any of them. SAA's kind of strike me as having gone through the same thing early 911's are just went through. As antiquated as they are, they somehow developed some sort of mystique around them that started attracting folks who really don't know anything about them. All they know is it is somehow "chique" to have one, and to speak knowingly about them. And, just like the early 911, often the best cure for wanting one is actually getting one. Unfortunately, though, most folks find it easier to hang onto a revolver they don't particularly like than a car they don't particularly like. So, while we see some reality returning to the early 911 market, I'm not sure we ever will in the SAA market. Hell, there are folks out there snatching up the brand new ones with no intention of ever using them, waiting and hoping for the day they become "collectable". I'm hoping they have a long, long wait... |
Jeff, can you shead any light on these 2 Colts of mine? Might you know the year of manufacture of my Python. Early or late?
What is the overall build quailty difference between a SAA and my Colt Cowboy? Python s/n K80537 Cowboy s/n TF11890 Sorry about the really poor pics.... Thanks Mike http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1355925613.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1355925637.jpg |
Quote:
|
Yup, David (or tabs) will be a lot more help on serial numbers and dates of manufacture than I can be.
As far as the Colt Cowboy, it was Colt's attempt to provide a revolver at about the same price as a Ruger Blackhawk. The fit and finish are about like a Ruger, which is nowhere near that of the SAA. The lockwork is far different as well. The Cowboy uses coils springs, has a frame mounted firing pin, uses a transfer bar, etc. Unlike the Ruger, though, it still uses a half cock notch as the loading and unloading position. It's a more "modern", and somewhat "safer" (it's safe to carry with six rounds in it) gun than the traditional SAA, and a fine shooter, but it never really seemed to catch on. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website