|
Polar Moment of Inertia
The polar moment of inertia measures the resistance of a body to rotational acceleration about an axis. For a car, we are talking about pitch, yaw, and roll.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1362534640.gif http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1362534709.jpg The basic idea is easy to grasp intuitively. A dumbbell is harder to spin than if the wt.s were placed in the middle of the rod. Another, and more aesthetically pleasing, example is to watch a figure skater as she spins with her arms out and then brings her arms in, or vice versa. [insert pic of gorgeous ballerina babe here] |
I always thought of pitch, roll and yaw as orientation and not so much as energy. But there is no doubt that a car with everything packed into the middle, between the wheel base, is easier to bring back out of a lack of control. But, that assumes no aero ground effects.
That would really put the interest back in racing and driver talent to take a lot of the aero effects out of F1 and other series, AFAIC. I suppose that's why I still watch NASCAR because they drive the things, not pilot them. I don't approve of the antics, but that's off the subject. The aerodynamics of stock car racing don't overcome the ability of the car to be driven with a little yaw. Personally, I submit the characteristics of the 914 v. the 911, both of which I have tracked. Love the 914. |
You can measure it:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1362606314.jpg but not too many people have one of those in the back yard. The other option is to calculate the polar moment: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1362606428.jpg There are also equations for a cloud of points. Those interested can plug that into their distributed parameter vehicle dynamics model. :D |
Ah yes, high school physics.
Also why the Cayman is a fundamentally better chassis than the 911. Should I put my flame suit on now or later? |
Your description sounds like mass moment of inertia. I memory serves, polar moment of inertia is related to structural strength and mass moment of inertia is related to changes in rate of rotation.
But it's been a while since college physics. I may be wrong - again. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is really a win-win situation. |
Sometimes people get confused when they are planning a weight (mass) reduction program on their 911, and they only think about the weight distribution and how to change it. But, you can’t just think in terms of statics, you have to also consider dynamics.
One example on this forum involved how desirable it is to move the oil tank from behind the wheel to a position in front of the wheel. As one poster noted in that thread, it won’t change the wt. distribution much. But, it would have a greater change on the handling dynamics of the car. The oil tank is a difficult example because we really don’t know how much it weighs while the car is moving. If it is empty, it weighs 10.7 lbs. with all hardware, but no hoses, valves or the 1.2 OC-54 oil filter (at least, my 1973 tank does). If it is full of oil, add maybe 17 lbs. (10 quarts in tank and a specific gravity of ~0.84 for engine oil at 100 °C). |
The issue is how controllable is the vehicle at or over the limit and how much it lets you to react in a confident way. Otherwise you just drive slower, so as to avoid a nasty surprise.
|
unless you hit some gravel or something in the road - happens all the timer here
---------------------------- The other thing is to think about what one should do to make their existing car more fun or more controllable. Inspection of the equations in post #3 shows that in each the effect depends linearly on mass, but on the square of the spatial dimension. Back to the oil tank... - in terms of center of mass, you are moving ~~ 15 lbs. several inches and it is still behind the center of mass - but think about the polar moment (comparatively speaking, to keep it simple) - the original distance from the center of gravity (Cg) is about 41" but with the tank in front of the rear wheel, that distance is ~~ 6" so, 41^2 = 1,681 vs. 6^2 = 36 ... a big difference. And it gives some insight into why Porsche kept trying to move the oil tank in front of the rear wheel. |
Having weight on the rear drive wheels increases traction, and the light front end increases toss-ability, while driver confidence is improved knowing he has to focus on what only one axle is doing.
All the mass in the center is not always best in all situations: Remember the SWB early cars were lengthened for purpose, and the center-engine WW2 fighter P-39 had a nasty reputation for easily falling into permanent flat spins. |
My 914-6 is a good example of low pmi. It will feel balanced because it is, and you can pull almost 1G in a 4 wheel drift. But push it beyond it's limit and it will spin so fast you might not catch it. I had to react blindly to a spin induced under braking to avoid a deer. I sprained two fingers and my thumb in the process of catching the spin. The 911 never spins like a 914 does.
|
yup - part of that is the longer wheelbase; Porsche went from a SWB 911 to the LWB partly for that reason
|
|
Quote:
|
I deal with this topic on my hovercraft and with that the center of lift should be ahead of the center of gravity, else a nose dive and end over end flipping could result upon power loss.
With the center of gravity aft of the center of lift, the tail comes down first just as with aircraft making a landing. I read this recently - Aside: Our own car designs - Page 2 - Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website