| Jeff Higgins |
04-20-2013 03:45 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by widebody911
(Post 7397656)
I've started a couple of threads on this in the past. I see this ending up where they can't force you to use one, but your rates will be a lot higher if you don't. I'd love to hack one to replace the collected data and transmit "f*ck you" once a minute.
|
Yup, absolutely - that's next. Anyone who can't see this coming just isn't paying attention.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RWebb
(Post 7397656)
all the more reason to have mass transit
|
For everyone but me... Wouldn't that be great? And therein lies the problem.
Just for a moment, consider the possibilities of combining these two concepts. Discounted insurance because you can show you drive less through your use of mass transit. That'll force 'em to ride...
Here in Washington, we already pay for mass transit with gas taxes. Now the state is adding a surcharge to our yearly vehicle registrations to help pay for mass transit. In the meantime, the vast majority of busses drive around empty. The ones that do manage to get packed to the gills - the rush hour commuter runs - can't charge enough to actually cover costs, when all those empty busses driving around the rest of the day are factored into the equation. If people had to pay what it really costs to ride the bus, they would drive instead.
Would could, however, continue to make it seem financially attractive by subsidizing it. Why not have the state encourage "discounts" on car insurance to twist our arms even harder? Lots of behaviors can be encouraged or discouraged through insurance rate manipulation. Just wait for Obamacare to see how bad that can get...
|