Pelican Parts Forums
Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Navy to attempt 1st unmanned carrier landing (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/760178-navy-attempt-1st-unmanned-carrier-landing.html)

kach22i 07-10-2013 02:52 AM
Navy to attempt 1st unmanned carrier landing
 
Navy to attempt 1st unmanned carrier landing
Navy to attempt 1st unmanned carrier landing
Quote:
NORFOLK, Va. (AP) — The Navy will attempt to land a drone the size of a fighter jet aboard an aircraft carrier for the first time Wednesday, showcasing the military's capability to have a computer program perform one of the most difficult tasks a pilot is asked to do.

If all goes as planned, a successful landing of the X-47B experimental aircraft will mean the Navy can move forward with its plans to develop another unmanned aircraft that will join the fleet alongside traditional airplanes to provide around-the-clock surveillance while also possessing a strike capability. The aircraft's success would pave the way for the U.S. to launch unmanned aircraft without the need to obtain permission from other countries to use their bases..........
Click the link above to read more.

http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/meb...706700137b.jpg

We have seen the helicopter UAV's landing on a carrier posted in this forum before. Somehow I thought something of this size has been done before.

JJ 911SC 07-10-2013 03:22 AM
Its the future.

ZOO 07-10-2013 05:07 AM
I didn't think the drones were so big . . .

Seahawk 07-10-2013 05:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOO (Post 7540492)
I didn't think the drones were so big . . .
This one is huge because of the endurance and payload requirements. Some UAS are very large...they are unmanning blimps!

The first UAS helo landing onboard ship was in 2006 om the USS Nashville, not a carrier.

That was my operation and system, FireScout.

dtw 07-10-2013 05:33 AM
That plane has a seriously Skynet vibe to it.

krystar 07-10-2013 05:58 AM
more like the movie Stealth with jamie foxx and jessica biel

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stealth_(film)

BReif61 07-10-2013 06:00 AM
This is so cool. I hope it works out.

John Rogers 07-10-2013 06:09 AM
No big deal, during Vietnam, the A6 Intruders could take off, fly to a set target, bomb it and the return to the Big E and land all by computer. The pilot didn't have to touch the stick.

M.D. Holloway 07-10-2013 09:27 AM
Pretty much how commercial craft flies today - pilots are there for the passengers piece of mind.

Jim Richards 07-10-2013 09:51 AM
Still, it's pretty cool stuff. Go Navy!

rusnak 07-10-2013 10:07 AM
I like how they're signaling to the drone to take off, haha! Might as well give it the ol thumbs up sign too.

Flieger 07-10-2013 10:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rusnak (Post 7540921)
I like how they're signaling to the drone to take off, haha! Might as well give it the ol thumbs up sign too.
They are also signaling to the cat operator and everyone else on deck. They want to stick to procedure so nothing goes wrong.

70SATMan 07-10-2013 11:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rusnak (Post 7540921)
I like how they're signaling to the drone to take off, haha! Might as well give it the ol thumbs up sign too.
Landlubber!:D

The only Pilots that really "take off" of their own accord on a Carrier are Helo.

The Cat Officer has taken the signals from other members of the launch team and is giving the signal to proceed with the launch notifying Deck crew that the aircraft is cleared to take off at the push of the cat button by the cat operator (sitting at the hatch controls).

The launch of the first unmanned drone was back in May. However, it did not return to the Carrier. This will be the first attempt at a Carrier landing.

RWebb 07-10-2013 11:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by john rogers (Post 7540571)
No big deal
.

very big deal - without a pilot in the aircraft, you can design for a much, much higher performance envelope

you can also undertake missions w/o risking the life of an American

tcar 07-10-2013 12:45 PM
The Drone has Trapped
 
Landed.

Navy, Northrop Score Historic First With Successful X-47B Drone Carrier Landing « Breaking Defense - Defense industry news, analysis and commentary


OOPS... sorry, I hadn't watched the video.

DID NOT LAND, just did a touch and go.

That's not a trap.

Did not have an arresting hook down.

kach22i 07-10-2013 01:11 PM
The congressman's comments got me to thinking.

Range:
Northrop Grumman X-47B - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
The X-47B has a maximum unrefueled range of over 2,100 nautical miles (3,900 km), and an endurance of more than six hours.
Specifications (F/A-18E/F)
Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
Range: 1,275 nmi (2,346 km) clean plus two AIM-9s[
I have not yet found the endurance time of the Super Hornet.

The increased stand off distance should make carrier crews more comfortable when dealing with rouge states like Iran.

RWebb 07-10-2013 01:17 PM
carriers - that's fine; but the real fun part is to launch drones from submarines, or submersed emplacements

kach22i 07-10-2013 01:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RWebb (Post 7541278)
carriers - that's fine; but the real fun part is to launch drones from submarines, or submersed emplacements
The visible intimidation factor and "presence" is not there.

Perhaps the same can be said of drones themselves.

70SATMan 07-10-2013 01:36 PM
Who "Called the Ball"?





mmmmmmmmmmm

Jessica Biel

Jim Richards 07-10-2013 04:40 PM
Thinking like a sailor, Michael. :)




Go Navy!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:59 AM.
Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.