Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   The reason the 928 was intended to replace the 911.. (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/784852-reason-928-intended-replace-911-a.html)

PushingMyLuck 12-01-2013 05:38 PM

The reason the 928 was intended to replace the 911..
 
Is it true that the 928 was intended to replace the 911 because it was feared that the air cooled 911 wouldn't be able to pass the Swiss "drive by" noise regulations or American crash standards?

wwest 12-01-2013 05:46 PM

The 928, like the pushrod Corvette and Viper, was to be sold on to fans of BIG IRON.

pors1968 12-01-2013 05:51 PM

i guess they misunderstand the market .

kiwiokie 12-01-2013 10:52 PM

I thought the reason was they thought the air cooled flat 6 would not be able to meet increasingly strict US emission standards not crash standards. If you think they misunderstood the market just compare the dimensions, weight and creature comforts of any 911 after the 996 and the 928 and you could argue they were just 20 years ahead of their market.

Noah930 12-01-2013 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PushingMyLuck (Post 7785074)
Is it true that the 928 was intended to replace the 911 because it was feared that the air cooled 911 wouldn't be able to pass the Swiss "drive by" noise regulations or American crash standards?

From what I've read, Swiss drive by noise regulations as well as world-wide emissions regulations contributed to the anticipated demise of the air-cooled flat 6 motor (and 911). The only time I've heard of crash standards being a big concern was the development of the targa bodystyle, as there was fear that convertibles would be banned.

stuartbrs 12-02-2013 01:58 AM

My 928 has a RMB... and it is LOUD.... but, its nothing like a 911 to drive, I think the whole 928 was supposed to replace the 911 thing is a bit of a myth. Well, maybe not myth, but certainly not a literal reason behind the 928`s inception. It was more expensive, harder to make, harder to build, harder to service, and had some very expensive quality materials for some very mundane parts (roller bearings in the pedals for instance...!) The 928 is a GT car, not a sports car, clearly Porsche never had any intention of racing it, unlike the 911. I think it was more the 944/968 range of cars that were going to be the 911`s replacement. That's my opinion anyway.
The 928 is a brilliant car, but its almost alien to the 911, they really are completely different types of performance car.

wayner 12-02-2013 03:33 AM

That may make sense since it was the 944 cup series that eventually lead to later 911 911 cup racing (once the 911 was back on the long term product list).

javadog 12-02-2013 03:52 AM

The 928 project began in earnest when Dr. Fuhrmann returned to Porsche in 1971. They had already been thinking about the next generation of cars and had a sportier car in mind, one that was related to a design project they were doing for Volkswagen, but it got killed. A study had been underway to determine the best layout for a car, based on 40+ characteristics, and the front engine/rear gearbox design seemed to be the best. Emissions, noise and crash safety were just a small part of it. Comfort, luggage space, driving qualities, performance, aerodynamics and various other things were evaluated. They also wanted to consider their current market. The 911 was a step up-market from the 356 and they didn't want to go backwards.

So, when Fuhrmann got there, he re-arranged the priorities (prototype racing was shelved and 911 development and racing were pushed, to buy them some time) and work on the 928 began to take shape.

The 924/944 came along later.

JR

kach22i 12-02-2013 06:25 AM

Some history adjacent.


1987 Porsche 928 H50 Concept
1987 Porsche 928 H50 Concept - Top Speed
http://pictures.topspeed.com/IMG/cro...c-1_600x0w.jpg
http://pictures.topspeed.com/IMG/cro...onc_600x0w.jpg
Quote:

The reasons behind Porsche’s decision to cover up the 928 H50 Concept for the past 25 years appears to have stemmed from their observation that the car’s body didn’t meet the company’s standards.

quaz 12-02-2013 06:41 AM

Yes because this car is soooo much better looking SmileWavy
http://www.highsnobiety.com/news/wp-...panamera-1.jpg

GH85Carrera 12-02-2013 06:43 AM

Dr. Fuhrmann was never a fan of the 911 and really disliked it. He said once it was not profitable it would die. And he would not allow any further development at all. Some development went on in secret, but nothing major. When the American Peter Schutz was hired to replace Dr. Fuhrmann he took a magic marker to the board that had the projected demise of the 911 and extended the line around the room. Peter Schutz saved the 911.

javadog 12-02-2013 06:45 AM

All of that was much later, after the 928 was in production.

JR

cockerpunk 12-02-2013 07:11 AM

i think it was a combination of many things, between emissions of the air cooled engine, the handling and reputation of the 911 as a killer, and with the danger of the corvair, threatening that rear engines would be banned in the USA.

porsche has always hedged there bets, and made sure that they have something ready and are not caught with there pants down so to speak.

note: the 918 spyder is the perfect version of this thinking in the modern age. porsche knows carbon taxes, emissions, and other regulations are going to sink the true ICE super car. better to be ahead then behind.

Z-man 12-02-2013 07:16 AM

To say the pre-996 911 uses an air-cooled motor is somewhat of a misnomer. The 'air-cooled' motor uses oil as the primary cooling medium.

Back on topic - I have also read that the 928 was to replace the aging air-cooled 911. Apparently, new technologies allowed the Porsche engineers to increase horsepower and fuel efficiency as well as decrease noise and emissions on the air-cooled (er, oil-cooled) motors are nearly another 20 years. In retrospect, perhaps the 928 project encouraged the air-cooled motor engineers to push the limits further on the tried-and-true 911 motor. Necessity is the mother of invention...

-Z-man.

javadog 12-02-2013 07:33 AM

They began design of the car that was to become the 928 long before the 911 was "old". It was only 6 years into it's production cycle at that point. Porsche never intended for the 911 to go on as long as it did, even before Fuhrmann tried to kill it in the late '70's and early '80's. Porsche realized the 356 had a finite run and assumed the same thing would be true of the 911. The 928 wasn't replacing the 911 because of any shortcomings, per se, it was just "the next car".

JR

kach22i 12-02-2013 07:55 AM

Conception
Porsche 928 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Project 928: A Development History of the Porsche 928 from First Sketch to Production
Hardcover
by Julius Joseph Weitmann (Author) , Rico Steinemann (Author)
http://www.amazon.com/Project-928-Development-History-Production/dp/3879435189
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...4,203,200_.jpg
Quote:

Hardcover
from $199.94
7 Used from $199.94
1 New from $783.20

McLovin 12-02-2013 08:41 AM

That's an expensive book.

At that price, you can buy a book on a 928, or an actual 928!

javadog 12-02-2013 09:09 AM

Got that book... It's a good resource. The guy that wrote it was a Porsche employee, very high up in the food chain.

JR

Nickshu 12-02-2013 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cockerpunk (Post 7785801)
and with the danger of the corvair,

What danger? The NHTSA as well as Texas A&M tested the Corvair extensively in the early 1970's and found it to be no more unsafe than any front engine/rear drive car on the market at that time. Nader was the "inventor" of the media grievance industry and made up most of his claims.

...I might be biased though (see signature).

To add to the discussion, I have read all of the above about the demise of the 911...Emissions, noise, air cooled limitations in HP and heat, unrefined to drive, demand for V8's to compete w/ Ferrari and Corvette, not profitable to build....

jwgn777 12-02-2013 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickshu (Post 7786627)
What danger? The NHTSA as well as Texas A&M tested the Corvair extensively in the early 1970's and found it to be no more unsafe than any front engine/rear drive car on the market at that time. Nader was the "inventor" of the media grievance industry and made up most of his claims.

...I might be biased though (see signature).

To add to the discussion, I have read all of the above about the demise of the 911...Emissions, noise, air cooled limitations in HP and heat, unrefined to drive, demand for V8's to compete w/ Ferrari and Corvette, not profitable to build....

I agree with you about the Corvair, It was unfairly targeted.

cockerpunk 12-02-2013 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickshu (Post 7786627)
What danger? The NHTSA as well as Texas A&M tested the Corvair extensively in the early 1970's and found it to be no more unsafe than any front engine/rear drive car on the market at that time. Nader was the "inventor" of the media grievance industry and made up most of his claims.

...I might be biased though (see signature).

To add to the discussion, I have read all of the above about the demise of the 911...Emissions, noise, air cooled limitations in HP and heat, unrefined to drive, demand for V8's to compete w/ Ferrari and Corvette, not profitable to build....

it doesn't matter if it was or not, what matters is that the threat of legislation was real.

Nickshu 12-02-2013 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cockerpunk (Post 7786700)
it doesn't matter if it was or not, what matters is that the threat of legislation was real.

This is true. Unfortunately perception is reality whether it's true or not. Nader did mention both VW and Porsche in his book, he just took aim more at the Corvair b/c they had sold many more in the USA at that time and it was American, which I believe he saw as a "foreign" invasion into American design philosophy, in a sort of McCarthy-istic way. No doubt since the USA was a very large market for Porsche it was likely a concern for them at the time.

red-beard 12-02-2013 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kach22i (Post 7785729)

That looks like a Porsche Hearse

GWN7 12-02-2013 05:13 PM

The 928 was almost the first car to be called a "Super Car"

First Super Car : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Snh1b7h2sMA

Nickshu 12-02-2013 05:43 PM

Now I know where Ferrari got the idea for this thing:

http://www.automotiveaddicts.com/wp-...ar-585x413.jpg

Jrboulder 12-03-2013 02:12 AM

The 928 reminds me of the Cessna 177. Just alternatives for a small portion of buyers rather than the replacements they were intended to be.

petrolhead611 12-03-2013 02:25 AM

I loved the 177 that I flew. Looked much nicer than the 172, and with much improved visibility.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.