![]() |
Quote:
|
agree blue sky, however, I don't recommend short cuts when teaching weapon handling to newbies......
At my range you learn all the rules and there are zero exceptions. |
I have to agree that how you respond to taking a life depends on you. The problem is that you don't know how you will respond until after the fact. I have seen many people deal with this issue and was alwasy pretty surprised by how each person handled the situation. I was wrong at least half the time as far as how I thought the individual would handle the stress. This was after months of training with each person fully expecting to face the possibility of killing someone.
|
My thoughts go to training: NEVER pull a weapon unless you intend to use it.
Could people face charges in certain jurisdictions? "Biden's warning shot" is a first degree felony in his state, cyclying a round I believe is assault with deadly weapon (please, I could be wrong about this). The cycling indicates intent. If your life is not in danger why did you go to that extreme? If your life is in danger why did you not fully protect yourself? Of course, if you keep the tool locked away and unloaded then cycling a round is unavoidable. On my old, nasty 60 year old revolvers the safety is the hammer. Pull it back and point and click. Cycling rounds is surprisingly quick and easy even in a SAA. Distance (lack thereof to allow for your actions) is what works against you. |
In a home defense situation, if one hears a suspicious noise in one's house, and is able to arm himself, but has not been able to identify who is making the noise, I believe a firm and loud Who are you? Get out of my house! The police are coming! I have a gun! is sufficient to get that person's attention.
While you may reveal your location in your home (unless you pipe your message through an intercom system), I believe you setup the situation effectively to the intruder - whether that intruder is an innocent, or a perp: the way that person reacts to your message will determine the outcome of the situation. If the intruder choses to attack you, hopefully you are in a defensive position (for you and others in the house) where you have the tactical advantage (effective cover, good line of sight...etc) and you have minimized the opportunity for the perp to gain the upper hand. If you need to move to another room (child's room, for example), hopefully have have prepared yourself and can effectively clear the space between you and the destination, and are prepared to take action if necessary. To the experts out there -- is this a feasible situation, or a bad idea? -Z |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Thanks - you had me worried. I think we have a fairly responsible group of gun enthusiasts here on PPOT. I couldn't imagine any one of them thundering down the hall, sixguns a'blazin', and ending up with "sorry honey, I shot the kids..." :eek:
On a serious note, though, z-man has it spot on - bark out a clear, concise warning. Give 'em a second or two, then go blazin' down the hall... ;) |
I'm not worried, it's doubtful they get past the claymores in the yard.
|
Quote:
Obviously compensating for something... |
I do not have time to read 5 pages and i am sure it has been said -
NEVER ever load, point, rack aim UNLESS YOU plan on following through....or it will just go very very bad for you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
He ofcourse, had the complete advantage and if Id had a shotgun he'd have had that too. As it was, we went at it in a big way, trashed the place even more, I kept most of my stuff and learnt that its very hard to stop someone who just wants to get away. However twenty years later, we're both still alive. And by now I wouldn't be missing that VCR anyway. |
Quote:
You might have to adjust your story to your attorney AND, in this country it it used to be thought you just need a attorney when guilty..not so any more.! What ever you say..might be worked against you |
I think your best bet is to have the wife call 911, then ensure that your warnings to the intruder are loud enough to be picked up by the 911 dispatcher. That way if you are forced to shoot the guy there is evidence of the verbal warning prior to pulling the trigger.
As long as your state has some sort of castle doctrine I think your on safe ground if the person is actuall within your home when you shoot. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As I stated, if you can prove the perp had the ability and opportunity to jeopardize your/your family's life, you have a good HD case. If the threat is gone (the guy is leaving), it will be difficult to show that your life is in jeopardy. That said, if I have given him warning that he is to leave my home because I am armed, and he continues to come towards me (based on the location of my voice), then all three (ability, opportunity, jeopardy) can be easily proven, especially if 911 is listening on the other end. But if I am to give him a warning (and subsequently give away my location), I better be in a position where I have cover and a clear shot, and he does not. (IE: behind a dresser with a line of sight to the door which the perp has to go through to get to me.) Regarding calling 911 -- the first thing I've learned to say is my address. Then if there is time, it would be helpful to describe what you look like, and what you are wearing, so when the police arrive, they will know who the homeonwer is. (ex: "I'm a 25 year old male, weigh 225 lbs, and am wearing Hello Kitty pajamas.") I've heard stories where a robber actually wore pajamas and a robe, and as he was leaving the home would tell the police that the perps are still in the house! -Z-man. |
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website