Which one of you created this?
 

A PPOT member must have created this video.

<iframe width="640" height="390" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/qHQWlFtSptU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

My coworker shared this morning. Seriously good stuff. The same video is out there with a slightly different edit. There's a second guy in the frame at the beginning and end.

that's awesome. I wish I had seen that years ago.

NICE!

Thanks for posting Red Baron!

That is freaking awesome. And so true.

OMG!!! ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !

Funny. But if you really want to break it down into fine science, you need look no further than Ladder Theory

The Ladder Theory

We should get Lubemaster to create a series of videos for us like this!

Excellent.

Is he wearing a sidearm?

This video was great, but it's really just a derivative of this prior work and it leaves out the intelligence factor.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1406898237.jpg

First thing I noticed (strapped on for a righty)...then he's writing with his left hand....odd :confused:

Great video.

1. He may be ambi-dextrous.

2. It is difficult to get left-handed holsters. I'm a lefty. Trust me, it is difficult.

3. His cell phone holster may be on his left side.

4. Poser.

I thought about that too Z....still seemed odd to me. I'm a lefty too, have a LH holster for my .45 (A Colt w/o ambi- safety, etc.), but like most, I've just learned to "adapt" to a righty world for most of my tools.

I think it is a cell phone holder.

An iColt :D?

Pause the video at 13 seconds in....

Off-topic but... proper target practice should include:

1. Shooting two-handed - dominant hand.
2. Shooting one-handed - dominant hand.
3. Shooting two-handed - non-dominant hand.
4. Shooting one-handed - non-dominant hand.

This is especially true if your focus is home defense. You may not be able to position yourself in a location where you can defend yourself and be able to aquire a target using the two-handed dominant hand method.

That said, it still doesn't make sense why the man in the video would have a RH holster if he is left-hand dominant, as evidenced by his writing. It could have been a prop as a means of indicating that he's prepared if a crazy-level-10 woman happens across his video.

I bet 99% of the people that have seen that video noticed the holster. However, only on Pelican do you find a discussion about how the holster does not match the handed-ness of the wearer! Aint Pelican grand!?!

-Z

Very nice, thanks for posting.

<iframe width="853" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/hKWmFWRVLlU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Here's the full original YouTube post. The guy is a lawyer in middle Tennessee and represents James Yeager (the other guy in the video) among others. Watch to the end for the "Male" matrix.

Or, 5. He's right eye dominant. I'm a righty, but shoot lefty because I'm left eye dominant.

According to the late great Louis Awerbuck:

"Two is one. One is none." and "Fastest reload is the backup."

Hmm - hadn't considered that. Latest school of thought is to shoot with both eyes open - hard for me to do - but I'm still trying to figure out with which eye I aim better with...

-Z

It's not difficult to determine which eye is dominant. Easiest way is simply to close each of them (one at a time) and look at things with just that eye. Your dominant eye will naturally want to stay open, and kinda "fight" you.

I've never really been a pistol shooter. For rifles, we kept both eyes open to scan for targets; once target was acquired, close weak eye for proper sight picture. In Basic training, I couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. Finally, a Drill Sergeant tested my eye dominance. Told me to shoot left handed, and I've qualified Expert ever since.

indeed, by far and away the most comprehensive and scientific theory of women out there.

my favorite part is under objections "this is just satire right?" his answer "nothing is just satire"

or this one:

Criticism: In the section on ladder disparity you make reference to the 'hypotenuse.' The ladders however, are metaphorical constructs, and are not a defined distance apart from each other so this term is misleading.
Answer: It seems that way at first, but that's because you have failed to understand the topology of Ladder Space, which should of course be so obvious that a formal proof is not required. Idiot.

also, before taking any mans opinion of women seriously, we have to see his resume. up to an including his current.

That was soooo funny because it is so true!!!

Spot on. Particularly the male matrix.

If you hadn't already lost it, I would flag you for a serious man-card violation.

sorry if a fat balding man spewing a joke from how i met your mother on a white board in front of a bunch of giggling dudes does not impress me as far as understanding women. :rolleyes:

Lighten up, francis.

Ha ha......love that one!

<iframe width="640" height="480" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/C6cxNR9ML8k" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

that vid is a 10

:eek: