| Craig T |
08-29-2014 09:27 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by onewhippedpuppy
(Post 8235939)
Early 911s are beyond the reach of the average buyer. They certainly don't offer nearly the performance of any of the cars you listed without investing cubic dollars on top of their already hefty price of entry. Not really a valid comparison in any way.
|
+1 From first hand experience...Unless you go crazy with a 993 turbo motor, even "cubic dollars" can't match it from a performance standpoint.
It cost me $26K to produce a 300hp 3.4L "streetable" motor for my hot rod...from a case, rods, and heads I provided! That's more than the total cost of a low-mileage Z06 for over 100 LESS HP, with no A/C. Plus, I still have the low RPM cough of PMO's vs. state-of-the-art MP-EFI. Put on modern MFI or EFI on a 911 and you sink another $15K.
|