Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   If you don't know a 2x4 isn't actually 2"x4"..... (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/830040-if-you-dont-know-2x4-isnt-actually-2-x4.html)

emcon5 09-16-2014 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilberUrS6 (Post 8264224)
No.

If you look at the lawsuit, it's that the lumber did not even measure the 1.5" x 3.5" nominal standard, and that the lumber was out of specification, NOT that a 2x4 is not actually 2" by 4".

Citation needed.

That is not what any of the press releases I see say, even those by the aforementioned Pedantic assclowns.

daepp 09-16-2014 09:20 AM

I can't speak for other states, but what really concerns me about CA is that the agency that does the enforcement gets to use that fine as part of their operating budget.

This happens all the time throughout CA, with air quality, job safety etc. and it encourages the regulators to go after anyone with cash. With respect to a lot of the "dirty" work, it's often the small guys who are the worst. But they have no assets so they are seldom pursued.

SilberUrS6 09-16-2014 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by emcon5 (Post 8264305)
Citation needed.

WCLBMA: Lowe's Case Partly Involves Labeling Non-Wood Products as Wood | ProSales Online

This is not the only article citing the deeper issues.

Hugh R 09-16-2014 09:41 AM

We buy specialty cut clear select lumber for our catwalks above our sound stages to replace old damaged lumber because the original lumber for the walking surfaces is like 70 years old and not made commercially anymore. I think its true 1" by 6".

look 171 09-16-2014 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daepp (Post 8264316)
I can't speak for other states, but what really concerns me about CA is that the agency that does the enforcement gets to use that fine as part of their operating budget.

This happens all the time throughout CA, with air quality, job safety etc. and it encourages the regulators to go after anyone with cash. With respect to a lot of the "dirty" work, it's often the small guys who are the worst. But they have no assets so they are seldom pursued.

You hit the nail right on the head. It happened to my father's small jewelry business and its happening to mine. Yes, we pay their salary and make sure they have job security through fees and more fees. Its for our own safety:rolleyes:

wildthing 09-16-2014 10:23 AM

I'm suing Porsche because they said they sold me a 911 but it really is a 991.

island911 09-16-2014 10:35 AM

what happened to buyer beware? Supplanted by an abundance of bored lawyers?

I mean, when I buy lumber, I know that uniformity is poor at places like HD or Lowes.

If I want high quality and uniformity, I go to Dunn. ...and verify. (really, how hard is it to measure such simple dimensions?)

DaveE 09-16-2014 10:36 AM

Just imagine if they went after the "food" industry...

Z-man 09-16-2014 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bpu699 (Post 8264234)
Next lawsuit...

Penny nails aren't a penny....

120V really isn't...

Lifetime latex paint only lasts 10 years if youre lucky...

The list goes on...

Kalifornia is wacky...

...And a lifetime roof will last about 30 years...

...And a Mercedes AMG C63 has a 6.2 liter motor

---Next they are going to go after cereal boxes with the bags half-empty. Nevermind the statement: "this package is sold by weight, not volume. Some setlting may have occurred during shipping..."

But here's where I'm gonna make some real money:
I am going to sue all of the schools in America, as well as all the textbook publishers for falsifying information and leading young people into deception, since they have been teaching that the wars/conflicts from 1337 to 1453 is called "The Hundred Year's War."

FYI: from wikipedia (if you can trust them), I found this:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1410892923.jpg


-Z-man.

porwolf 09-16-2014 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z-man (Post 8264149)
Wow.

2x4's have been that same size (1.5 x 3.5) since the day after they switched from using logs for houses (aka log cabins) to using planks...

-Z

Not so. My place in Los Angeles was built in 1928. most of the framing is done with real 2"X 4" redwood lumber and it is rough saw cut, not smooth like today's 2X4's.

Porsche-O-Phile 09-16-2014 10:41 AM

If you don't know a 2x4 isn't actually 2"x4".....
 
They were 3-5/8" x 1-5/8" before the 3.5" x 1.5" standard was developed. I think we should retroactively sue for that too.

My house is full dimensional (built in 1940). You could probably park a 747 on it too.

island911 09-16-2014 10:42 AM

And they round the corners - what a rip-off.

DaveE 09-16-2014 10:44 AM

Meanwhile Home Depot is running around replacing all their signage.

Z-man 09-16-2014 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveE (Post 8264510)
Meanwhile Home Depot is running around replacing all their signage.

...and TrueValue just ordered a massive supply of sawdust, wood shavings, and wood glue...

look 171 09-16-2014 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porwolf (Post 8264495)
Not so. My place in Los Angeles was built in 1928. most of the framing is done with real 2"X 4" redwood lumber and it is rough saw cut, not smooth like today's 2X4's.

red wood???

scottmandue 09-16-2014 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by look 171 (Post 8264513)
red wood???

My first house was built out of redwood... 2"x3" redwood on 24" centers with 1/4" drywall... little concrete piers underneath with chunks of log stuffed in there to hold up the floor joists...

Good times... good times...

Rumor had it the guy who built that house had a job building shacks for the railroad... I suspect he built the house with materials he brought home from the job.

To the OP, if you didn't know a 2x4 isn't actually a 2x4? You haven't worked with lumber in the last 20 years. :D

JAR0023 09-16-2014 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sand_man (Post 8264215)
This is what I always thought too!!?? I've known this since I was a little kid. Just thought it was part of construction industry jargon; referring to them as "2x4" instead of "1.5x3.5"

I thought this was a right of passage for boys. I remember as a young kid helping my Dad with some project or another and grabbing a tape and checking out a 2x4. I thought I had found something when the wood was undersized until Dad set me straight.

We are going through a remodel/addition now. I got piles of lumber everywhere. At some point in the last few months I explained to my eleven year old that lumber is not the actual size listed. -J

scottmandue 09-16-2014 11:31 AM

Hmmmmm... so what are the dimensions of the new sheet metal studs?

ossiblue 09-16-2014 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottmandue (Post 8264589)
Hmmmmm... so what are the dimensions of the new sheet metal studs?

metal 2x4's are 1 5/8 x 3 1/2, slightly "thicker" than wood. 2x6's are 1 5/8 x 6.

nota 09-16-2014 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Z-man (Post 8264149)
Wow.

2x4's have been that same size (1.5 x 3.5) since the day after they switched from using logs for houses (aka log cabins) to using planks...

-Z

NO
I have worked on older wood boats that were full inch dimensions
you have to buy 5/4 stock now to get a 1'' stick of wood finished
but it was not always that way
pre-1900 homes are full dimension ie a 2x4 is 2'' by 4''

MY 1940 HOUSE WAS VERY NEAR FULL SIZE LUMBER
later in the post war boom they began shrinking/cheating

and the yards are still cheating with ever smaller undersized pieces
newer planning mills can get a smaller shave then 1/4 per side
they start under size now and CHEAT YOU


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.