ossiblue |
12-23-2015 07:47 AM |
From the article, the concept sounds much like radar/sonar in that the target is a passive "reflector" or, the cell signal could be absorbed by a living thing in such a way that it is identifiable. If I understood the text correctly, cell phones already are capable of this type of tracking but lack the "interface" to display it--I take that to mean the inability to read the rebounding/absorbed signal and then display it in any meaningful way.
My first thoughts as I was reading was the invasion of privacy factor, be it from the government or private sources. Personally, I wouldn't want anyone to be able to track my movements behind closed doors and within my own home. Once in public, all bets are off as already one needs to assume that they are constantly under photographic surveillance. Moving that ability to watch your movements inside your own home by anyone with the "app" is more than uncomfortable, IMO.
And does anyone really believe that, “The user interface will be friendly for setting it up and using it at home, but it will be very hard to use it to track someone just by pointing it at their wall,” will not be easily manipulated to do exactly that when, in fact, the device is already touted as helping government and police "see" through walls from the outside?
Seems to me, such a device would be a boon to the baddies as well. What potential burglar wouldn't like to know if the house or building he was about to hit was unoccupied or, at least, where in the building the occupants were?
This could be another genie escaping from the bottle.
|