![]() |
The universe is stranger than you could have thought
http://www.nature.com/article-assets...16-0036-f1.jpg
Three different elements of the flow are presented: mapping of the velocity field is shown by means of streamlines (seeded randomly in the slice); red and grey surfaces present the knots and filaments of the V-web, respectively; and equi-gravitational potential (ϕ) surfaces are shown in green and yellow. The potential surfaces enclose the dipole repeller (in yellow) and the Shapley attractor (in green) that dominate the flow. The yellow arrow originates at our position and indicates the direction of the CMB dipole (galactic longitude l = 276°, galactic latitude b = 30°). The distance scale is given in units of km s−1. |
This is the first rational explanation of iTunes I've ever heard. You should get a Nobel!
|
Quote:
|
I thought it was the tiny bones in your inner ear.
|
Bill ...must be the proposed locations and gravitational effects of either black holes or dark matter/energy in our " Local Group " of galaxies... however the sigma units are puzzling'' JMHO...
or the thought processes of the race stewards who scored the win for WTR at Daytona yesterday .... |
A cosmic fetus.
|
Quote:
Also not associated w/ general cosmic expansion It acts like a bar magnet but it's not magnetic either. |
proves the universe is female...we shall never understand it
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Men will understand the universe someday, but never women's brains. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This new "dipole repeller" is a lack of mass, possibly caused by the the initial quantum fluctuations that caused the overabundance of mass at the attractor? The quantum collapse of the Higgs field during the Big Bang could cause large high and low energy points as well as the well modeled filaments. |
To give you an idea of distance, the legend shows 15,000 kms^1? That's about 650 million lightyears. Hubble's Constant is about 75 kms^1/Mpc, so divide 15,000 by 75 to get 200 Mparcecs. A Mparsec is 3.26 million lightyears, so 200 Mparsec=650 million lightyears
The whole image is about 2.6 billion lightyears across. The Observable Universe is considered to be closer to 100 billion lightyears across, so you get a sense of scale compared to the "big picture". |
|
mike thanks very much superb description.... btw the hubble constant was just refined to about 71.something +/- 3.2 ish in a spate of five papers to be published soon. the groups used lensing of large quasars i believe where the bent light could be resolved into 4 or 5 spots per quasar ( if i am reading this correctly) which makes for a very highly refined distance measurement.... i have lately become fascinated with cosmology ... reading penrose, eddington etc... unfortunately, i still cannot get my brain to wrap around the mathematics of singularities and event horizons... though , when i am "horizoned" by another car on track.... I KNOW IT!! :) FRANK
|
HERE IT IS.... ACTUALLY its 71.9+/- 2.7 KMS/sec/mparsec accurate to 3.8 percent. thats pretty impressive.... called the HOLICOW experiment... really !
https://phys.org/news/2017-01-cosmic-lenses-universe-expansion.html |
Is this going to be on the test?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website