He won't say.

His gig is to state some condescending remark mixed in with his vomit. That's all this old shell of a man has.

I ain't a PARF type guy but I know horse shiet.

Stuff it, afterbirth. You don't have the integrity to come clean. Just like a better man than you, Ronnie, says.

You wanna go, Chump? Punchy? Bring it. I hate the a-hole scum in this forum. A-hole just for sport.

This sounds like a response on Craigslist when I tell spammers to eff off.

Dude, are you effing serious?

Can you comprehend how vacuous you are appearing?

13k posts and this is all you got? "Too simple for ya?"

Well then your "IT" then.
ALL you have is a bitter taste in your mouth for no particular reason except to argue what you know nothing of.
Your loud uneducated mouth has led you into a land where you trespassed the" dont go here I am too stupid sign."
You did it anyway.
Congrats and good for you and your Craigslist reading where you and your ilk hang out .
Like I said -show me where I am wrong.
Simple.
Now go suck a unicorn.

Dude, you did not attend college. The end.

Is that your final answer?
You make the accusation and come up with that?
Show me where I am wrong.
I posted the answer the text , the link.
Too simple ?
The collage of "Simpleton" has not helped you.

This rubs folks the wrong way. Stop doing that.

You have numerous posts about stripping fat. I am so totally down with that. I agree.

Producers don't add water. Do they add water? If so say it. Say they add water or stand down.

Secondarily, for the consumer to add water to spread the volume. I understand that.

I also understand the post that states that nutrition is compromised when water is added.

What is it that my ilk and I are missing?

I guess its something to do with your college education you are bragging about?
Start with post #48
I drew a paint by number pic for ya.
Like i said -If you want to make 2% milk at home you would add water.
The opposite is true also, remove the cream and you have more water.
I can no longer digress to answer full on retard questions here.
Go back to where ever you went to school and get your money back.

Keep it to a simple linear argument.

You have been all over the board with your commentary.

Eff the milk business. You are a scatter gun.

You also consistently slide a smart ass, condescending remark in your posts. You shoot your own foot off.

College or no college, it's just common sense.

You are too stupid to talk to.
Which dumbarse AKA are ya here besides boby?
I have just two (2) things going here for arguments.
JUST TWO
Follow closely- Pay ATTN!
Context, context.
You may get 2% by removing the cream. Simple
OR
You can add water. Simple
That is not quite all over the board, but truly far beyond your ability to follow, as I have stated this about ten times.
I am done .
Carry on your retard game or real life crises somewhere else.

It is simple.

First data point - slam dunk.

Second data point. WHO ads the water?

Talk to me. Is it the producers like you inferred in post #25 or is it consumer Joe who can water down the milk in their kitchen to make it stretch at the cost of nutritional value? I say producers don't add water.

Also, address the issue of nutritional value with respect to the water adding scheme.

Tell me specifically where I am an idiot. Type an entire sentence out explaining where I don't get it. Is it more important for you to pummel me or more important for you to get your point across in a way that is understandable.

Excuse me whilst i go scream.
Go read the link.
IDC anymore

Me neither.

DO PRODUCERS ADD WATER LIKE YOU SAID IN POST # 25?

You are unable to own your milk comments.

Will you two geezers stop milking this topic?

MattR

Burner, do you actually think you are right here, in this thread? You stated clearly the producer adds water, that was proven to be incorrect so you seamlessly switch to stating that you meant the consumer could and have the same result as buying it at that %, then it is pointed out to you quite correctly that water and milk fat are not the sum of the make up of milk, therefor that adding water is not "exactly the same' as buying at your grade, and at that point you try to belittle Kontak for pointing out how assinine your argument is? Have you ever admitted your wrong? How long before you delete these posts as is your habit?

I never stated they add water. (If I did it was a typo of sorts )
So show me that one.
I am pretty sure it was an illustration that said it " would equal the same results."
There are a couple ways to make milk blue.
The math is the same, - the factory can remove the cream and leave more water.
Or, you can add water at home .
It is that simple.
The govt (the middle man) would consider that a crime (to add water ) but they don't mind promoting GMC,
or charging the farmer extra if he wants to go natural.

Cutting a product, with another product, by definition means "adding" it.
It implies you add a cheaper product to a more expensive one , to create more volume of the more expensive product, at cheaper cost then actually selling pure product.
It is a term that implies fraud. or at the very least false advertising.

You cannot cut anything if you do not "add" something cheaper "TO" the product you are cutting.

To cut Cocaine , you take a K of blow at you buy for 30 grand, you add a K of laxatives you buy for 200 bucks
And you then sell it as 2 K's in dime bags for 80 grand

That , is cutting.


English..My third language... Your first?
Try harder.

Where it is done is the point.
Now, what are you arguing about?
2% milk is just more water less bovine juice.
If you want to arbitrate, silage and till this until the ends of the time go ahead.
If you want to construe where the milk is cut with water (or the cream deleted) go ahead.
It does not change the answer.
When you have a zero for argument resort to the effeminate schrool marm deal, I guess you will..
But get your dress on straight.

Now if you know a better way to make 2% milk do tell me.

God you sound like an idiot when you post burner.