Pelican Parts Forums - Chem Trail buddy is at it again

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)

- Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)

- - Chem Trail buddy is at it again (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/993042-chem-trail-buddy-again.html)

Quote:

Originally Posted by GWN7 (Post 9994213)

For about a week he ranted on about Alexa prophesises about the end of the world.

His latest is Building 7 of the World Trade Center. He mixes in the twin towers conspiracy theory's about it.

First it was blown up. Then some secret government agency planted nano thermite which melted all the I beams in the building. It was so much superior than the thermite I can make is why it worked so well. Today Israeli agents pretending to be running a art exhibit planted explosives on the top floor of the building. He's got proof.

He's not or doesn't appear to be a danger to himself or others yet but really needs some help.

How do I get it for him?

I feel for you bro. If he is just rambling I don't think there is anything you can do. Keep your eyes and heart open but don't endanger yourself. If he becomes dangerous in some way then you can try to get him help, but if he isn't a danger or doesn't want help you're just an observer.

Yeah, if he starts advocating the breaking of federal laws (immigration) he might need a visit from the FBI.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1523368885.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by john70t (Post 9995344)

If any person you know does not accept the standardize media explanation for suspicious major events involving trillions of dollars and nation-building and nullification of constitution powers, just have them committed.

Ok. Got it.

I love this. Lots of really smart people won't question stories that have major holes in them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpeastend (Post 9995414)

"He's not alone in with that theory. The engineers and architects for 911 truth seem to think that your friend's idea is true. It does seem more than coincidental that building 7 came down without a plane hitting it. Just an office fire brought it down?"

"Building 7 is easy to explain.
The electrical substation for the entire wtc was underneath the building. Also stored there was the diesel stores needs to fuel the off line generators.
Massive arc faults coupled with diesel fuel caused building 7 to collapse."

I don't normally post about my job but I've been a cop for almost 30 years and was there that day...pretty much the longest day of my life. After all the surreal images wore off for that day, I was standing next to a battalion chief looking at bldg 7 burn and gingerly asked him why they weren't doing anything about it. It was fairly obvious they lost a lot of people that day and I felt like a bit of a heel to even bring it up but the fire in bldg 7 didn't look too bad to my uneducated eye. Pretty much just the first 2-3 floors were burning. He told me that the bldg was too far gone & dangerous. Sure enough, about 2 hrs later, down it came. After that, I don't talk about fire & structure-related issues that I know nothing about. I leave that to Rosie O'Donnell and the rest of those nattering nabobs that know exactly F about shyte.

That must have been your worst day on the job and thank you for being there. Did it seem like the chief you talked to knew building number 7 was going to come down? I watched an interview where an official used a demolition term to describe its fall. He said they decided to "pull it". That sounded fishy to me and thousands of others. The roof buckled in the middle, then it fell perfectly just like an engineered fall does.

Quote:

Originally Posted by LesPaulFan (Post 9995867)

Doesn't the perfect collapse raise your eyebrows? It would all be believable if the buildings toppled over. The perfection of it all is enough to be suspicious over.

You canna change the laws of physics. For the building to not go straight down requires force.

asymmetrical damage does not cause symmetrical collapse

Quote:

Originally Posted by john70t (Post 9996006)

Yeah, if he starts advocating the breaking of federal laws (immigration) he might need a visit from the FBI.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1523368885.jpg

the majority of the world population who can read the bottom line aren't going to agree with what it says.

My buddy has mentioned this organization several times (The engineers and architects for 911 truth).

He claims they represent 2200 engineers and architects but "In 2009, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth had a booth at the annual convention of the American Institute of Architects.[19] AE tried to get the AIA to pass a "Building 7 resolution" - "a Position Statement in support of a new investigation into the complete collapse of 7 World Trade Center on September 11, 2001." However, it failed by a vote of 3,892 to 160 - garnering just over 4% support.[20] The AIA has maintained separation from Gage and his organization. AIA media relations director Scott Frank has stated that "We don’t have any relationship with his organization whatsoever."

You would assume that if they had the support claimed that the numbers of their members at the meeting and voting on the proposal would be higher. Maybe they have more Engineers as members?

Thanks LesPaul, the Chief didn't come out and say it was going to collapse but he said it was too dangerous to fight the fire which, at the time, was solidly across the entire base of the bldg consuming the first 3 or so floors. By the time the bldg came down, it had spread to the 5th & maybe 6th floors.

I shouldn't be even speculating but my opinion is that because the fire was spread across all the footprint of the bldg, weakening the 1st thru 5th floors, when it started coming down it pretty much went straight down. If it had been only on one side of the bldg, wouldn't that make the bldg fall more like a tree that everone seemed to be expecting? Even if that were the case, it probably wouldn't fall like that due to the cross-integrity of the remaining structure because it's all tied together. Red-Beard is right...gravity wants to suck the thing straight down and it requires tremendous force to start it moving otherwise. Trees fall the way they do because their stiffness remains intact along their length and the base was just chopped away. On a bldg, if the bottom structure goes "soft" due to high heat, I don't think the upper structure has the strength like a tree to remain intact and it just seems to collapse on itself as things shear. The loads & forces are tremendous.
Anyway, here I went and started talking about stuff I know nothing about. Now we just need Rosie to come and talk about steel burning.