![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
POR15 vs Eastwood
The success of POR 15 seems to be reliant on a prefect prep job according to their process, while the Eastwood products seem to be a simpler application.
Has anyone had experience with either or both of these products? I'm working on my fuel and oil tanks as well as some other small bits, and need to arrest the rust and provide a good protective finish. The rust is minimal, and mostly around the lip. I don't mind the top of the fuel tank and the oil tank being a smooth finish, but I'd like the bottom of the fuel tank to have some chip protection as well. Thanks
__________________
'88 sunroof delete Coupe in Venetian Blue (back on the road Wooo!) '11 Cayenne Manual, as in it has a clutch :-) (daily driver) '97 BMW Z3 (wife's ride) |
||
![]() |
|
dkbautosports.com
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: branford ct
Posts: 3,638
|
i'm not a fan of either of them theyare over priced and just not that good .
for less money you can buy SEM it offers better hold out and lasts longer it's top coatable with every thing . matches the finish of more things like the floor pans and you can paint over it with it's self with out lifting . |
||
![]() |
|