![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
Dilemma
Ok I have a dilemma and looking for some opinions.
I have a 3.0 engine and a 2.7 mag engine and they both need rebuilding and I’m doing them myself. I’m trying to figure out which one to keep for a 916GT I’m building. The givens: ITBs and EFI Coil on plugs Crank triggered ARP head studs and rod bolts So do I build the 2.7 into a 2.8 or the 3.0 into a 3.? I’m leaning towards single plug and 9.5 but I have a twin plug 10.5 motor in my 911 that screams and it sure is fun but I don’t know if I need the extra umph. If you had a reasonable wish list which one would you build for yourself and how would you build it. Whichever one I don’t build for me I will rebuild basically to sell. Thanks in advance Tony |
||
![]() |
|
It's a 914 ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ossining, NY
Posts: 4,706
|
The 3.0 is a much more robust platform. Between those two options, I’d certainly consider that in making a decision. Do you have any autoX or racing classes in mind for the car? Displacement can be a deciding factor.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
No just a fun street car
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: bottom left corner of the world
Posts: 22,741
|
The 3.0 made into a 3.2 with the 98mm's.
Sounds like fun whichever you choose. |
||
![]() |
|
Banned but not out, yet..
|
3 to a 3.2 short stroke?
__________________
An air cooled refrigerator. ‘Mein Teil’ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Can I bore and replate the existing cylinders and just get new 98mm pistons?
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: I be home in CA
Posts: 7,685
|
__________________
Dan |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
How does a 3.0 make a 3.2ss?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
And should I go 10.5 twin lug or 9.5 single plug? How much hp difference is there approx between the two?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: bottom left corner of the world
Posts: 22,741
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I get it now
Because the 3.0 rods are shorter than the 3.2 rods. I think that’s my plan so the next step is 9.5 or 10.5, single or twin plug? Does it add much hp for the money? Pistons are the same price (almost) but the twin plug adds machine shop expense and 6 more coils expense. Is it worth it? Tony |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,617
|
3.0 rods are 127.8mm long. "Regular" 3.2 rods are 127.0mm center to center. Be mindful of the piston pin size, too. 3.0 are 22mm. 3.2 and 3.3 are 23mm.
Sell the 2.7 as a core. It'll likely need a lot of machine work once it gets torn down. See if the crank spins freely before you tear it down. If it doesn't, for SURE it'll need machine work. Your call on twin plugging it. Pro: better combustion, less timing advance, more resistant to detonation "might" make a tiny bit more power. Con: cost, more complex wiring, more plugs to change on tune-up. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Glorious Pac NW
Posts: 4,184
|
Here's a contrary view; I've never driven one myself, but many have said that the free-revving 2.7 motors are a lot of fun in a light car.
Which a 916GT would be, no?
__________________
'77 S with '78 930 power and a few other things. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I’ve heard the same about 2.7s which is why I bought it but I have a twin plug hot rod 3.0 SC that revs like a sport bike so a similar engine in a lighter car will be even more fun.
It’ll also be much more able to handle the extra stresses over the mag case 2.7. I have full fg front and rear fenders with the flares built in along with fg front and rear bumpers so weight savings are important. Tony |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Years ago I had a 2.7 in my 72 and wanted more power. The cost to modify the 2.7 was what pushed me to a 3.0. I found an 83, small valves, and with the help of Mike Bruns in florida went to work on it. The 3.0 was a couple lbs heavier but much stouter. I wanted something I could run the daylights out of and then drive home and change the oil adjust the valves and that's all.
What I came up with, with Mike's advise and help was 9.5:1 pistons, twin plug, 40mm webers (later opened up to 42mm), ARP rods/bolts and the crank modified to turn 8000 rpm. I had a custom cam cut that lowered the peak torque (217 ft/lbs) to 4500 rpm while making peak power (245 hp) at 6900 rpm. I wanted a lower peak torque because that's what pulls you out of the corners. My 915 trans is geared to where each shift drops to 4000 rpm. I don't do many track days anymore but the 22,000 miles on this engine have included lots of tracks when I lived in Florida and now on the west coast. With the weight I've removed from my car, now 2200 lbs, it gives me a 9:1 power to weight. She has been bullet proof which is what Mike and I built her to be.
__________________
Kent Olsen 72 911 SCT upgraded 3.0L McMinnville, Ore |
||
![]() |
|