|
|
|
|
|
|
RETIRED
|
SB 708 update....
Just posted from the 356 list....also known as the anal retentive tail draggers....
LEGISLATIVE ALERT UPDATE Congratulations everyone on your hard work and commitment to stopping Senator Florez from pursuing his repeal in S.B. 708 of the current emissions exemption for collector vehicles. Following is an article we thought you would enjoy reading since it reports your tremendous legislative efforts and victory. Keep up the good fight. McKeel Hagerty President, Hagerty Protection Network _____ FLOREZ REVERSES ON CLASSIC CAR SMOG RULES By VIC POLLARD, Californian Sacramento Bureau e-mail: vpollard@bakersfield.com Tuesday April 15, 2003, 10:56:17 PM SACRAMENTO -- With Jay Leno and the rest of California's classic car buffs on his case, State Sen. Dean Florez has dropped his proposal to require smog checks for cars as old as 1958 models. Leno, "The Tonight Show" host who has a large collection of vintage autos, personally called Florez's office to lobby against the plan. The lawmaker was also inundated with letters, e-mails and phone calls from many other members of the highly organized hobby car community. One of their tools was a cartoon depicting Florez in his state-leased SUV chasing classic cars out of California. Florez was forced to back down on the bill, one in a package of 10 bills aimed at cleaning up the air in the Central Valley, before it even got its first legislative hearing. The bill, SB 708, isn't dead, but it has been amended to crack down on cars that emit visible smoke. Originally, it called for requiring regular smog checks and repairs for cars up to 45 model years old. If in effect this year, it would apply to cars made in 1958 or later. That would have replaced the state's existing exemption for cars older than 30 model years, which this year is 1973. "Given all the fights we have on all the other air pollution bills," Florez said, "it wasn't going to help to push that one." He said classic car fans made a convincing argument that most of the oldest cars on the road, while they may be some of the worst polluters, aren't usually driven to and from work daily. "We told the classic car folks that we're going to continue to talk to them," Florez continued, "but that was just too much of a detailed type of proposal." Florez's legislative aide, Michael Rubio, said Leno called after reading a newspaper article about the smog bills. " He said he wanted to know what the deal was with (SB) 708," Rubio said. "Several days later, he called back and said, 'You've got me thinking now.' And I said 'Can I start at the beginning?'" He said Leno listened carefully and discussed his thoughts on the smog problem and the bill at some length, urging Florez to carefully distinguish between older cars that are driven for basic transportation and those that are merely exhibited most of the time. Other problems, he said, are the difficulty of getting repair parts for older cars and the fact that emission controls were not mandated on cars until the late 1960s. The same arguments were made by the classic car community's chief lobbyist, Steve McDonald of the Special Equipment Marketing Association, a trade group of manufacturers, retailers, publishers and restorers. "Obviously we're thrilled that the senator has agreed to modify the legislation and refocus the target on what we believe is a more effective one, that being smoking vehicles," McDonald said. So are hobbyists like Jan VanderPool of Bakersfield, who, with his fiancée, owns three vintage Ford Mustangs. " That's definitely a big relief to me," he said. VanderPool said it took years and a lot of effort to get the rolling exemption from smog checks for cars that are more than 30 years old enacted in 1997. Florez and his staff appeared surprised, if not shellshocked, at the size and aggressiveness of the lobbying campaign against the smog check proposal. But it was no surprise to VanderPool, who has been through similar drills before when legislation was proposed that helped or hurt car hobbyists. "A lot of us have had to get pretty political," he said. "We've had to get active and kind of watch our backs."
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 154
|
How do they define visible smoke?
__________________
Stuart Williams '65 911 2.0 '68 FIAT 850 Special '71 GT6 ex-Zundapp collector |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,580
|
So...the bill's alive, but has been modified to address only smoking vehicles?
Will the 30-year rolling window stay in place? Colin
__________________
993 |
||
|
|
|
|
Non Compos Mentis
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Off the grid- Almost
Posts: 10,602
|
How to define "Visable smoke"?
I can't explain it, but I know it when I see it. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 154
|
Yeah, but white, grey, black?
What about condensation on cold mornings? Do the neighbors rat out on you? Or do they use a laser system?
__________________
Stuart Williams '65 911 2.0 '68 FIAT 850 Special '71 GT6 ex-Zundapp collector |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I just want to know about the 30 year exemption.. is this still in effect?
Jorge (Targa Dude) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
RETIRED
|
White or black smoke from a tail pipe of a warm engine more than 20% opacity as defined by the Ringlemann scale developed by the US Bureau of Mining.......the humidity can not be more than 75% to get a valid reading.
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
|
|
|
|
RETIRED
|
Quote:
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,580
|
Well this is great news, and thanks for posting it Mike.
The cynical side of me believes that Jay Leno's phone call made more difference than all the letters we wrote, but a win is a win. Colin
__________________
993 |
||
|
|
|