![]() |
Checking Cam Timing with Engine In
I just finished a 3.4 rebuild (my first) and have been trying to start up for several days with no success. I'm beginning to think I set the cam timing wrong. Currently getting spark and fuel, but so far the only success I've had was about 30 seconds worth of running on cylinders 1-3. Very frustrating - but gotta keep moving forward!
I was confident that I set up the timing correctly, but since it was my first time there is definitely a chance I did it wrong. Any recommendations on checking the cam timing with the engine in the car? - Ian |
You need to remove the muffler, the engine tins, engine mount bracket from the car (after supporting the engine so it does not drop). Remove the intake valve cover and the timing chain housing cover. Mount the gauge to the top of the valve, and do your valve timing measure.
Where did you get the spec? |
Spec came from the Webcam's spec provided with the cams. As I understand it, its Webcam's 'stock Carrera' spec regrind. Something like 1.4-1.7mm lift at TDC. When I set it I believe I was able to hit 1.55mm on the money for both sides.
|
Can also try a compression test. If things are extremely low on a new albeit unrun engine then it's definitely cam timing.
|
Just checked compression - 155-165 across all cylinders. I'd say that's about perfect for a 9:1 engine that isn't broken in.
|
Just need to pop off the upper covers to check cam timing.
|
Quote:
|
He said check.
|
Quote:
|
Cam timing check simplified.........
Checking the cam timing is totally different from adjusting it. You could perform a quick test by following John Walker’s advice. Why removed the muffler and the engine tin? You might not even need them removed after all.
Tony |
You might have one cam 180 degrees out. Both banks would be trying to fire at the same time.
|
Quote:
|
Found one problem - perhaps it helps identify the other
My distributor was misaligned - I aligned it to TDC on cylinder 1. Engine fired up right up but ran very sooty and didn't want to rev. Upon shutting down, I noticed that exhaust pipes for 1-3 were hot - but 4-6 were still cold. I 100% measured lift of the intake valve on 1 and 4, at TDC - but I'm questioning whether or not I spun the engine 360, or 720 when starting to set the timing for the right side (bank 4-6). Could that cause and ignition timing & intake/exhaust valve opening mismatch that would prevent combustion? |
Stupid question... are you sure your plug wires are in the correct position? 100% sure?
I just reinstalled my motor after a lot of work that included retiming the cams...I had the wires in the wrong position when I reinstalled and tried to start the car...it happens. |
Yep did the same thing recently. I swapped plug wires 1 and 5. I hope it’s that easy!!
|
Quote:
|
When you set #1 intake clearance, mounted the dial gauge and rotated the crank 360°, did #4 intake then have some valve clearance so you could mount the dial gauge, or did you have to rotate the crank to get it?
|
Quote:
Get #4 TDC, zero the dial indicator, spin it one revolution, read the overlap. I bet 20$ that is your issue. And if you have to redo the cam timing, then ... the exhaust does have to come off. |
Thanks Yel - going to give this a shot. I believe what I should be looking for is that the valves on #1 should be completely closed (rocker slop) while #4's valves are starting to peak open (timing point - beginning of intake stroke).
I suspect that I will find that #1 and #4 will either be both in the process of opening, or both closed (AKA timed the same and not 360 deg out). Fortunately, the exhaust is simple to remove at this point! (see pic) John, I don't recall right off hand what I did as its been 2 months or so since I set the timing. I do remember installing the cams 'key side up', putting on the sprockets/chains and beginning the timing process on #1 - I don't remember futzing with #4 until I moved to that side to time it. I believe I zero'd the dial indicator when the valve was closed (rocker slop) and rotated the crank through TDC until I got the lift I was looking for. I unbolted the cam and rotated the crank back to TDC - then locked the cam. Spun crank 720 to recheck - and then moved to #4. I actually did this at least 2 times in order to perfect the measurements on both sides. I suspect that, as Yel pointed out, that I had the #4 in the wrong stroke for proper timing. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1598972387.jpg |
Oh man, that thing looks totally non-stock. Turbo and all. Since you are going through the trouble, check both sides.
Bring it to top dead center number 1. See if there is any valve slop on the rocker arm. Install your dial indicator, and zero it. Turn it 360 degrees, read the over lap. Then, bring it to number 4 TDC (technically, you are already there from the last step), check for rocker slop. Move the dial indicator over to bank 2, zero it Turn the engine 360 degrees, read the overlap. |
Follow these instructions (yelcab’s).......
Quote:
To OP, A version of the above instruction: If you have two (2) sets of dial indicators, it would be much easier. Set it @TDC @Z1, for cylinder #1 and turn the crankshaft 360°. Read the dial indicator. You are done now for cylinder #1. Move the dial indicator to cylinder #4: Reset to zero and turn the crankshaft another 360° (back again to TDC @Z1). Read the dial indicator. Repeat again and get an average. You are not alone. Even the experienced individual commits same mistake/s. Tony |
Update:
Took timing cover off the right side along with upper valve covers. Both banks were definitely timed the exact same. I moved the crank to TDC on cylinder 1, with the intention of then loosening the right bank's cam bolt and rotating the crank 360 degrees. While the #4 intake valve was closed, I set up my indicator to measure lift. I loosened all the valve adjuster nuts to max - rotated 360 degrees, pinned the cam adjuster/quarter tightened the cam bolt, and remeasured the timing. It was still in spec at ~1.6mm. Adjusted valves and buttoned everything up. Car started immediately! It also cranks much, much faster now that starter isn't trying to push through 2 cylinders in their compression cycle. Thank you for everyone's help! - Ian |
Imagine no bent valves !!!
|
Quote:
|
Whew, nice conclusion!
|
Quote:
|
Stomski tools.........
Quote:
Yel, There are no z-blocks in my tool box anymore. A switch has been made some years ago to these: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1599010860.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1599010860.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1599010860.jpg You don’t need these fancy tools to do a good job for your engine rebuild projects. I’ve been using home-made tools from Home Depot, Lowe’s, and Harbor Freight rebuilding more than a dozen engines before owning my first Stomski tool. You would think that these tools are expensive and extravagant to possess but wait till you use them. Your perception would change. I am cheap and frugal and only bought the wrenches I needed to do the job from HF. Then one day, I decided to replace my home-made PVC cylinder hold down gadget with Stomski SR-007 and continued adding more. There is no substitute for good quality tools. Tony |
Like I said, only the die-hards have those tools. I do cam timing on Ferraris and Porsches all the time and I don't have those high end tools. I finally bought some digital calipers and dial indicators because of the "zero" features. The math was too hard on analog scales. I also bought a fully articulating mounting arm with a single tightener and it really was a game changer.
Still, I can't see myself with that Stormsky set up. Maybe if I do a 911 once a week... I do have 12 torque wrenches.... |
great that you found the problem
those stomski's are nice i have the exhaust stud tool but have not splurged on the others yet. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website