![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
16x7 advantage over 16x6 up front?
I've been reading through the archives about going with wider rubber (without modding the car). The rear seems easy...going from 16x7 (225/50/16) to 16x8 or 16x9 (245/45/16) shouldn't be an issue.
For the front, going from 16x6 (205/55/16) to 16x7 (225/50/16) might or might not have a problem, so more than one person suggest to run the 16x7 with 205/50/16. If you do that, what is the advantage of going from the 16x6 to 16x7 rim? Just being able to go a bit lower profile? Getting a bit wider track due to the offset? |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
My tyre guy always complain bitterly about putting a 205 on a 6" rim. Keeps wanting a 6.5"or (if its a Fuchs) the 7".
He said the 205 doesn't fit as well (bulges) compared to on a 7".
__________________
1975 911S (in bits) 1969 911T (goes, but need fettling) 1973 BMW 2002tii (in bits, now with turbo) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I have 205/55s on 7x16s and they sit just right on the wheel, no funny bulge and the tire spreads out a bit. The down side is that I had to roll one fender (driver side) to clear. With 225/50s on the rear the car feels really good in the twisties.
My 2 cents
__________________
'94 CMC Firebird Trans Am '86 951 LS1 (C-2) Gone ![]() ![]() '77 911 3.2 (C-1) Gone but not forgotten. http://www.pelicanparts.com/MotorCity/marcesq1 http://www.youtube.com/user/958Fan#p/u |
||
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Looks more better.
Funny Bulges???? Yup, I got them too. Last edited by Mark Wilson; 05-05-2003 at 07:30 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: bottom left corner of the world
Posts: 22,741
|
I tend to choose average size rubber
![]() If you do go for the bigger rear wheels, pls sell me the spacers. That would save me asking you to buy some on my behalf at the next swap meet ![]() Your car in the other thread sure does look like my ones long lost brother. I'll have to get around to painting my wheels. |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
"Looks more better"
or hella sweet.
__________________
1975 911S (in bits) 1969 911T (goes, but need fettling) 1973 BMW 2002tii (in bits, now with turbo) |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Todd, I do think I remember a post where someone splained that the 7's on the front improves handling and had some scientifical reason. Probly in the archives somewhere. I bet Bill V would know the answer.
First pic 6 and 7's then 7 and 8's. ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: AZ
Posts: 8,414
|
Yeah, 205's on 7's = less side-wall flex, better tire geometry, etc. Although, this poses the question: Does everyone that uses (951) 8's up front run 225's on them?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,950
|
A 205 on a 6" wide tire does bulge as you described. I went with an 8" front off a 944 turbo to enable me to get a 225 up front. If you think a 205 bulges on a 6", a 225 on a 7 is worse. The 8" up front and the 9" in back give a nice balance of 225/45 and 245/24 as opposed to the 205/245. I actually think a 245 fits the 8" better. A 9" fuch actually looks stretched when fitted with a 245 and looks like it can use a 255 or slightly larger. Meadering asided, a 7" fuch fits a 205 better.
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
so Mark are they 16s, and what tires are you running? I agree...they look cibie sweet.
I've got 205/55/16s on 16x6 and don't find that they bulge much, but it might be tire dependent. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
'94 CMC Firebird Trans Am '86 951 LS1 (C-2) Gone ![]() ![]() '77 911 3.2 (C-1) Gone but not forgotten. http://www.pelicanparts.com/MotorCity/marcesq1 http://www.youtube.com/user/958Fan#p/u |
||
![]() |
|
Information Junky
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: an island, upper left coast, USA
Posts: 73,189
|
Quote:
Where as a 7" rim is 17% wider than a 6" rim. . . .so a 225 on a 7" shouldn't be as bad.
__________________
Everyone you meet knows something you don't. - - - and a whole bunch of crap that is wrong. Disclaimer: the above was 2¢ worth. More information is available as my professional opinion, which is provided for an exorbitant fee. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Todd,
Looks aside, a wider wheel provides better sidewall support. 1" more is good; 2" wider is even better, but there's a practical limit. The 944-16x8s w/225s are probably the widest Fuchs you can stuff in a stock wheel well. There seems to be more owners moving from Fuchs to aftermarket, which is good for those who like the factory wheels. Sherwood http://members.rennlist.org/911pcars |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I've heard that for the best sidewall and geometry characteristics, one should try to keep rim/tire > .88
205 mm is 8.07 inches. Ratio of rim to tire: rim = 6 inches, tire 205, ratio = 0.74349 rim = 7 inches, tire 205, ratio = 0.8674 Although still less than .88, the 7 inch rim looks much better ratio wise. For contrast let us look at some specs for a new Porsche. gt2 front rim = 8.5 inches, tire 235, ratio = 0.9187
__________________
Keith 1979 930 2007 WRX wagon Last edited by Yargk; 05-05-2003 at 10:08 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Tires are 205-55-16 and 225-50's - same size as stock. The tires in the second pics were trash that came with wheels. I have Potenzas now.
Just bought a set of 9's and will put 245's on those. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Galivants Ferry, SC
Posts: 10,550
|
I run 911 type 7" Fuchs for the front...more track width and more stable/vertical sidewall support for the 205's. Lessens understeer.
Still have 7" stock Fuchs on the back with 225's. Nice fr/rr balance for DE's on the track.... --Wil Ferch
__________________
Wil Ferch 85 Carrera ( gone, but not forgotten ) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
I'm doing the WAVE ![]()
__________________
'94 CMC Firebird Trans Am '86 951 LS1 (C-2) Gone ![]() ![]() '77 911 3.2 (C-1) Gone but not forgotten. http://www.pelicanparts.com/MotorCity/marcesq1 http://www.youtube.com/user/958Fan#p/u |
||
![]() |
|