![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
78 SC oil temp gauge reading high even at ambient?
Chasing down a possible oil temp sender or gauge issue and want to validate temp <> resistance of the sender.
Does anyone have the chart or the VDO part number? P/N: 911-606-112-00 - https://www.pelicanparts.com/More_Info/91160611200.htm?pn=911-606-112-00-M100 I _think_ the VDO cross-reference is this one (200 deg C) but would love to get confirmation
__________________
1978 911 SC (3.2SS, EFI, 993SS cams + the trimmings) Dynamic CR calculator: https://dcr.questionable.services/ Last edited by silverlock; 06-22-2025 at 02:47 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I just went through a problem I had. Porsche (911 Air Cooled) used two scales on oil temp, top of scale 300 and 340F. The chrome plated sender is mated to the 90-300F, 140-300F or 120-300F top of scale same sender, while the brass version is paired to the 140F-340F top of scale gage. I measured my sender “chrome plated” and it measured 2.9k ohms at cold room temperature 65F. The constant is the top value, bass=340F, and Chrome Plated=300F top of scale.
Last edited by porschedude996; 06-09-2025 at 09:50 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Useful, thanks!
911-606-112-00 is the 200C chrome-plated sender. Matched to my Style A gauge, which is original to the car. Seeing abnormally low resistance values, even at 70F ambient. Going to sit down tonight and test the sender, harness, gauge sweep (min/max at infinite/zero resistance) part by part and see where the issue is. The NPM senders rarely fail but lower than expected readings are a sign, as wiring issues would typically cause a short. VDO table 12 shows 20C/68F should read ≈ 3k Ohms with a +/- 13% tolerance per https://vdo-webshop.nl/en/temperature-sensors/453-vdo-oil-temperature-sender-200c-1-8-27-nptf-4103590949318.html - I think this is the right table based on your ≈2.9k Ohm reading? ![]()
__________________
1978 911 SC (3.2SS, EFI, 993SS cams + the trimmings) Dynamic CR calculator: https://dcr.questionable.services/ Last edited by silverlock; 06-09-2025 at 11:59 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Even though the thread form is wrong, the actual resistance may be the same. I can add a data point for you when warm. I need to warm her up. She has been asleep during my interior upgrades.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
A few other threads imply that the extrapolated values outside of the 50C (482 Ω) - 200C (14 Ω) endpoints are different. ≈ 1500 Ω at 20C — but I can’t find an official VDO table for that despite extensive searching.
__________________
1978 911 SC (3.2SS, EFI, 993SS cams + the trimmings) Dynamic CR calculator: https://dcr.questionable.services/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
As an update: I measured a clear 2.99k Ohms @ 68F at the sender with the signal wire disconnected.
This matches the table helpfully provided to me in a DM, and other VDO charts: Code:
| Temp (°F) | Resistance (Ω) | |-----------|----------------| | 36 | 6666 | | 67 | 2840 | | 74 | 2457 | | 78 | 2265 | | 89 | 1721 | | 94 | 1518 | | 110 | 1040 | | 115 | 943 | | 120 | 820 | | 125 | 758 | | 130 | 680 | | 135 | 606 | | 140 | 542 | | 150 | 450 | | 160 | 375 | | 170 | 317 | | 175 | 285 | | 180 | 262 | | 185 | 241 | | 200 | 185 | | 208 | 156 | | 210 | 159 | | 220 | 129 | | 230 | 109 | | 240 | 94.5 | | 250 | 78 | | 260 | 68 | | 270 | 58 | | 280 | 49 | | 290 | 48 | | 300 | 45 | | 325 | 41 |
__________________
1978 911 SC (3.2SS, EFI, 993SS cams + the trimmings) Dynamic CR calculator: https://dcr.questionable.services/ |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Why I’m asking: I suspect my gauge is out of calibration, and is reading high. It could be a sender wire issue, but a short would usually peg the gauge to max.
Example: full cold start (overnight), style A gauge, ign on, needle starts at about ≈ 115F instead of the bottom (<= 90F). I don’t think this is correct: it should start at the bottom of the gauge in temps below 90F ambient. • It then runs hotter than I’d expect (210F - 235F; never higher) despite having a big new CSF fender cooler, working (tested) thermostats & an engine oil cooler that was checked ~3k miles ago. • It is the correct oil temp sender for an SC: the later chrome plated sender (P/N 91160611200) • I’ve checked the sender connection at the sender itself, as well as reseating it and the ground wires at the gauge. Oil pressure is spot on and thus unlikely to be a bad ground issue at the gauge. Current thinking: sending the gauge off to be checked. Photo below shows ign on + ambient ≈ 68F and the gauge reading high. ![]()
__________________
1978 911 SC (3.2SS, EFI, 993SS cams + the trimmings) Dynamic CR calculator: https://dcr.questionable.services/ Last edited by silverlock; 06-22-2025 at 02:46 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I've been looking at this on my car just recently, so I'll add some data points. Not sure any of this helps you, but here goes:
How it was before: ![]() Refurbed gauge with Style A temp scale, warm engine: ![]() Reading 60˚C/140˚F with the IR thermometer on the block right next to the temp sender, matches the gauge pretty closely: ![]()
__________________
1981 911SC restomod "Minerva" 2004 Boxster S 2021 Cayman GTS 4.0 manual "Olive" 2014 Cayenne GTS V8 (wife's lover) The slope is not slippery; in fact it is entirely frictionless. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
For comparison purposes, my '83 911SC shows the following scale vs. resistance:
3/3 ~ 5.7Ω 2/3 ~ 52.5Ω 1/2 ~ 115Ω 1/3 ~ 160Ω 0 ~ 500Ω (just starting to rise) I had hoped to use the sender with my Megasquirt system to control the 15° and 30° switch functions, but it's too nonlinear to use for that purpose. It seems the gauge is also non-linear, and matches the sender's non-linearity. Hope that helps - |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I just went through this after my car sat for a year (rust repair). When I fired it up my oil temp gauge was reading warning, and seemingly high. I used my IR gun to figure that out, and just ordered a new sender. Swapped it out and fixed my issue. I have heard from John Bell (rebuilds gauges out here) and others that the gauges typically work or not, it’s the senders that are the issue.
__________________
Chris - Insta @chrisjbolton 1975 911s Insta: @911ratrod steel wide body, 3.6 conversion 1989 911 Carrera 25th Anniversary Ed (5th from the last car to ever leave the original Porsche factory assembly line) 2001 996 Turbo - ~54k miles |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I do have a brand new sender, but since the current one measures (at least at ambient) to spec, I’m hesitant to throw parts at the problem until I understand what’s leading to the high reading.
Need to bring my IR gun with me + cross-check resistance at sender with temp reading. Can be tricky to get a clean reading on polished surfaces.
__________________
1978 911 SC (3.2SS, EFI, 993SS cams + the trimmings) Dynamic CR calculator: https://dcr.questionable.services/ Last edited by silverlock; 06-23-2025 at 04:07 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Two tests you can try - use a hot water bath to quantify your sender. You can start with boiling water, and take resistance measurements as the water cools. If you want to get to the extreme points, use an ice water bath for lower temps and an oil bath for higher temps. The oil bath is a bit trickier due to the high temps, but I've been able to heat a small oil-filled container with a torch or small camping stove while taking readings. Best to do it outdoors and use glove/googles etc. Might be a bit more trouble than it's worth though -
To quantify your gauge, substitute a potentiometer in place of the sender (1k or so), and measure resistance vs scale. This should be a good way to quantify your system and will give you a better idea of where your problem lies. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
The guitarist in me loves the potentiometer suggestion!
__________________
1981 911SC restomod "Minerva" 2004 Boxster S 2021 Cayman GTS 4.0 manual "Olive" 2014 Cayenne GTS V8 (wife's lover) The slope is not slippery; in fact it is entirely frictionless. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
Chris - Insta @chrisjbolton 1975 911s Insta: @911ratrod steel wide body, 3.6 conversion 1989 911 Carrera 25th Anniversary Ed (5th from the last car to ever leave the original Porsche factory assembly line) 2001 996 Turbo - ~54k miles |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
To close this out: the chart I posted above is correct and I was just running hot.
Fixed this in two ways, on top of the CSF Carrera style oil cooler that we’d already installed: 1. Added the 3.2 Carrera shroud / stone guard + foam seal. This certainly helps force air into the cooler and is noticeable even before the fan comes on with a much slower temp ramp. 2. Installed a 7.5” SPAL fan (Patrick Motorsports kit) and the 195F SPAL thermoswitch + relay kit. Gauge reads a tidy ~200F, even after some spirited driving or in ~1 hour of NYC traffic at 90F ambient. Wiped 35-40F off the oil temps and haven’t seen a reading beyond 210F. The 195F (vs the OE 210F) thermoswitch + thicker CSF cooler really stack up.
__________________
1978 911 SC (3.2SS, EFI, 993SS cams + the trimmings) Dynamic CR calculator: https://dcr.questionable.services/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Well done!
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 605
|
Will the 195F spal thermoswitch fit in place of the stock Carrera oil cooler switch in the right front stock oil cooler without modification of the threads? If not, anyone know of one that will with a part number?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
You need a 3/8 NPT to M14x1.5 adapter for the SPAL relay 195F kit. FCP Euro, Summit Racing, Patrick Motorsports should all have one.
__________________
1978 911 SC (3.2SS, EFI, 993SS cams + the trimmings) Dynamic CR calculator: https://dcr.questionable.services/ |
||
![]() |
|