![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Near Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 1,076
|
![]()
Does anyone have a compiled list of performance statistics for the 911 series, especially the early and mid cars?
0-60, braking, top speeds, cornering G's, gas mileage, weight, etc.
__________________
-Rickeolis- 1986 Corvette |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
GT Purely Porsche magazine has most of the figures at the back.
__________________
Chris - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1982 911 SC Hellblau Metalic - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1997 Boxster 986 2.5l |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Oops...forgot the link.
__________________
Chris - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1982 911 SC Hellblau Metalic - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1997 Boxster 986 2.5l |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 316
|
Interesting.. http://www.gtpurelyporsche.com/data/GT06_105.pdf ..how the same weight is given (1210kg) for both the SC and 3.2 Carrera.
Aren't the SC guys always making cracks about Carrera weight? Maybe that's just another in a list of bull***** myths (the other most popular one being power steering) propogated about the 3.2 Carrera. Or is this thing wrong? ha ha,
__________________
~Hugh '84 Carrera |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Near Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 1,076
|
![]()
That was exactly what I was looking for, thanks so much-
-Rick-
__________________
-Rickeolis- 1986 Corvette |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Planet Eugene
Posts: 4,346
|
Yes, the tech spec books show a difference -- so the GT PP site is not accurate...
Of course, both SC and Carrera were bloated blobmobiles -- it's just a matter of degree. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bozeman, MT
Posts: 4,444
|
The PCA club race rules list SC's at 2552lbs and Carreas at 2756lbs, never understood where the 200 lbs came from, cars not that different. I sure a lot of people ahave had there G and F cars weighted (PCA race clesses for stock SC and carreas respectively).
Phil |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Swansea, MA
Posts: 278
|
Yeah, there are a bunch of sites out there that list the weight at different #'s for the same car. Some of the confusion comes from ROW vs. USA specs, I guess.
Hafta add that purely porsche link to the bookmarks, thanks.
__________________
John - no pcar, just doing "research" 03 Acura CLS 6spd 79 VW Westfalia - 2.0L, 4spd, 67hp 87 Craftsman 11/36 lawn tractor 78 John Deere 316 garden tractor w/ 46" deck |
||
![]() |
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 55,987
|
Options would change the weights of the cars, and there could have been a difference in weight between the '78 and the '83. I bet standard options changed considerably between the SC and the Carrera and I bet that's where the weight difference comes from.
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Planet Eugene
Posts: 4,346
|
The Carrera engine is bigger, it has 2 extra blowers in the footwells, etc.
|
||
![]() |
|
Go Speedracer, go!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,951
|
One thing to note, those specs are for European cars. I don't know how an SC could weigh as much as a Carrera. I assume a Carrera coup with no options could be pretty close to an SC targa with all options. Still most options on an SC were standard on a Carrera wern't they? If you look at the 0-60 for a Carrera it is only 0.1 sec faster at the same weight with about 30 more hp. That doesn't add up. I would assume the weights are not correct. I've been trying to find stats for my 81 Euro forever now, thanks for that link!
__________________
1981 SC ROW Coupe |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 316
|
Hey, I love my bloated blobmobile!
__________________
~Hugh '84 Carrera |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |