![]() |
Thoughts on this carb jetting configuration
3.2L short stroke
9.8:1 CR 98mm P&Cs Early SC Heads - single plug Elgin S cams (similar to GE60s) Electromotive HPX ignition 1 5/8" Headers and Sport Exhaust Weber 46 IDA carbs 38mm Venturi 60 Idle jets 160 Main Jets F7 Emulsion tubes 160 Air correction How does the carb configuration sound? |
Karl,
Those venturis are sized for a power peak at almost 6900 rpm ... sounds a bit high for GE-60 cams! |
The Elgin Modified S Cams (similar to GE60) should produce peak HP between 6800 and 6900 RPM. So shouldn't this be right?
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1060173224.jpg |
Is this a race engine? If not, the fundamental problem is the big carbs. Go with 40's for street use.
|
Karl,
Big problem with that chart is that it is, or seems to be, for a 2.0 engine [6800 rpm power peak for 'S' cams -- only valid for the '69 production engine] ... The power peak with 'S' cams dropped to 6200 rpm for the RS 3.0 engine, and would drop to perhaps 6000 - 6100 rpm in a 3.2 engine! GE-60 and your Elgin grind would see similar drops in a 3.2. I think you ought to go back to Elgin and ask what the power peak rpm should be for your setup. I think 35 mm venturis would be closer to matching your cams. |
Both... Street car some... Racing yes...
Based on displacment and cams it's right on the cusp of 40s and 46s... Plus, I already have the 46s. |
YOu may want to fax PMO.
|
Thanks everyone! :)
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website