![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Severna Park, MD
Posts: 1,324
|
motor/tranny mount question
I am thinking of trying to use solid mounts for my transmission to improve transmission feel. Any thoughts?
__________________
2002 C2 Cab, 1982 sc, 1978 sc, 1976 s,1985.5 944, 2003 Honda Pilot, 2001 Volvo X/C 70, 1977 FIAT 124 spyder (an abarth someday), 2 1984 Vanagon Westis 1958 BugEye Sprite, 1960 BE Sprite, 1978 Yamaha XS11 1970 Honda 750 K0, 1982 BMW R65RT, 1997 Duc 916 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Peoples Republic of Long Beach, NY
Posts: 21,140
|
most guys that do that love it..
__________________
Ronin LB '77 911s 2.7 PMO E 8.5 SSI Monty MSD JPI w x6 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Severna Park, MD
Posts: 1,324
|
Thanks! Anyone else?
__________________
2002 C2 Cab, 1982 sc, 1978 sc, 1976 s,1985.5 944, 2003 Honda Pilot, 2001 Volvo X/C 70, 1977 FIAT 124 spyder (an abarth someday), 2 1984 Vanagon Westis 1958 BugEye Sprite, 1960 BE Sprite, 1978 Yamaha XS11 1970 Honda 750 K0, 1982 BMW R65RT, 1997 Duc 916 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I have heard that solid engine/motor mounts cause more vibration. I am thinking about putting solid mounts in also, so if anyone knows: how much difference in vibration with solid as opposed to rubber mounts?
__________________
1975 911 Targa 1972 VW Beetle 2004 Mercury Mountaineer 2003 Suzuki Intruder 800 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,668
|
Do a search, you'll find many opinions ranging from "Intolerable vibration" to "not much difference".
I would ask what problem are you trying to solve? The real reason for putting in these mounts is that under extreme cornering loads (using race tires on the track), some cars flex enough that the shifter and linkage get out of alignment. This makes shifting difficult. If you are not experiencing this problem, then I wouldn't advise taking this step. A street car with good stock mounts should not experience this problem. I would advise replacing your mounts if they are worn. "Sport" mounts are available that are firmer than standard, yet still absorb vibration. These can be further tightened by inverting the large concave washers such that the "bowl" faces the mount. This is a nice intermediate step that would meet the needs of most without causing undue vibration.
__________________
Chuck Moreland - elephantracing.com - vonnen.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea.
Posts: 37,732
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Planet Eugene
Posts: 4,346
|
bowl faces the mount -- you mean concave downwards?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Severna Park, MD
Posts: 1,324
|
So you don't think this is a good idea? I was planning on using either stock or sport mounts on the engine end of things. I know there will be extra vibration but I am getting a good deal on these. That is why I am considerig using them.
__________________
2002 C2 Cab, 1982 sc, 1978 sc, 1976 s,1985.5 944, 2003 Honda Pilot, 2001 Volvo X/C 70, 1977 FIAT 124 spyder (an abarth someday), 2 1984 Vanagon Westis 1958 BugEye Sprite, 1960 BE Sprite, 1978 Yamaha XS11 1970 Honda 750 K0, 1982 BMW R65RT, 1997 Duc 916 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,668
|
Quote:
Tranny has only one washer, and it would also cup the rubber.
__________________
Chuck Moreland - elephantracing.com - vonnen.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Planet Eugene
Posts: 4,346
|
Ok thx - Inside surface of bowl faces the rubber mount.
|
||
![]() |
|