|
|
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Registered
|
930 G50 and torsion bars?
To add a G50 to a 3.2 which wasn't supposed to have it, you have to deal with the length of the housing, torsions are in the way etc etc.
Does that mean that a G50 930 had coilovers instead of torsions? '87 and '88 3.2's didn't...
__________________
dave 1973,5 |
||
05-06-2004, 12:28 PM
|
|
|
Back in the saddle again
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central TX west of Houston
Posts: 56,301
|
Wouldn't they just use the same style of torsion bar as the late 3.2L cars??
__________________
Steve '08 Boxster RS60 Spyder #0099/1960 - never named a car before, but this is Charlotte. '88 targa  SOLD 2004 - gone but not forgotten
|
||
|
05-06-2004, 12:43 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 308
|
They 89 930's with the G50 had torsion bars, but I think the lengths were different.
__________________
Tim 1983 930 w/ goodies |
||
|
05-06-2004, 02:09 PM
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,194
|
Actuaslly the 89 930 used a special variant of the G50 transmission - the G50-50. I believe this has a shorter bell housing to fit into the torsion bar suspension. For people with earlier 930s (say 86-88) that want to go a G50 retrofit, they must either use a G50-50 or have a regular G50 transmission shortened.
__________________
Bill |
||
|
05-06-2004, 02:19 PM
|
|
