![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southleft Coast
Posts: 184
|
1st Corner Balance Results
All German Auto in Escondido, CA did a corner balance and alignment on my car yesterday and I'm interested to hear from others if these are good numbers. I also had them install turbo tie rods while they were in there. (I know, I know, it's supposed to be an easy job and I should've bought the parts from Wayne and followed the instructions in 101 Projects, but I'm moving my company to a new building and I'm short on wrench time. That's my excuse and I'm sticking to it!) I haven't had a chance to drive it, except home from the shop but it does seem slightly tighter.
Total weight: 3058 Front weight: 1234, 40.35% Rear weight: 1824, 59.65% Left weight: 1592, 52.06% Right weight: 1466, 47.94% Left Front: 648 Right Front: 584 Left Rear: 945 Right Rear: 881 Camber LF: -0.5, RF: -0.6 Caster LF: 5.7, RF: 6.0 Toe LF: 0.16, RF: 0.16 Cross Camber: 0.1 Cross Caster: -0.4 Total Toe: 0.32 Camber LR: -1.1, RR: -1.0 Toe LR: 0.21, RR: 0.28 Total Toe: 0.49 Thrust Angle: -0.04 Thanks for any comments.
__________________
-Terry |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 159
|
Thanks for the heads up.
I have purchased the tie rods, plan to put them in and then do a corner balance. Guess you decided that your struts were ok? I have wondered about mine. I think they are 110k old. I don't really understand if those are before or after numbers. If after, why are camber number so different left to right. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southleft Coast
Posts: 184
|
These are the numbers after the balance.
The shop said the struts were in moderate to poor shape but I couldn't afford to have them do everything all at once so I opted to do the struts later. Is a 0.1 difference in camber considered a lot? Or are you looking at the 0.3 difference in caster?
__________________
-Terry |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Re: 1st Corner Balance Results
Quote:
One tenth of a degree of camber is not a lot. Your alignment specs look fine for a street car, except maybe the toe. Are these numbers for "toe-in"? What are the units of measurement? If they are in inches, you have a lot of toe in the rear and quite a bit in the front as well. TT
__________________
Tom Tweed Early S Registry #257 R Gruppe #232 Rennlist Founding Member #990416-1164 Driving Porsches since 1964 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southleft Coast
Posts: 184
|
It appears to be degrees since the paperwork shows the superscript circle symbol next to all numbers, but doesn't specify -in or -out. I'm guessing positive is out and negative is in?
What would an be an example of numbers that might change showing a car set up for street+AX?
__________________
-Terry |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Differences for autox/track-- you probably want 0 toe, or even slight toe-out in the front, to aid in turn-in. That can get darty in a street car, though. Depending on tires, you would probably want all the negative camber you can get. 2-3 degrees negative is desireable for most radial race tires. This will result in poor tread wear on the street, though. Are you a PCA member? You should come out to Qualcomm on June 6th for a PCA-SDR autox and see what your car can do. TT
__________________
Tom Tweed Early S Registry #257 R Gruppe #232 Rennlist Founding Member #990416-1164 Driving Porsches since 1964 Last edited by ttweed; 05-17-2004 at 08:07 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southleft Coast
Posts: 184
|
Thank you very much for your input Tom. Yep, I'm a PCA member and have been to Qualcomm for one AX and the Performance Driving School late last year in this car. It was a blast and I think I learned quite a bit. Most notably, don't drive over your lunch cooler in the excitement to get onto the track!
__________________
-Terry |
||
![]() |
|