Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   Unable to get proper rear toe-in alignment (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/164694-unable-get-proper-rear-toe-alignment.html)

Mike Bonkalski 05-25-2004 11:33 AM

Unable to get proper rear toe-in alignment
 
My alignment guy and I are stumped on our inability to dial in any rear toe-in on the right rear. When the eccentric is at the end of its range, we are still at a toe out situation. The eccentrics have been 180'ed to see if it would help - no luck. All of the other wheels are spot on.

Any suggestions on why we can't get the toe set correctly?

Btw, the reason for the alignment is installation of new polybronze bushings and monoballs.

--Mike

nhromyak 05-25-2004 11:35 AM

You need to set camber first.

IIRC you need about negative 1.0 degree (sometimes more) to get toe, especially if it's lowered.

Good luck.

Mike Bonkalski 05-25-2004 11:36 AM

We had the camber at negative 1.8 degrees with no luck.

nhromyak 05-25-2004 11:42 AM

Is it close?

My alignemnet guy(s) said to try and hollow it out, but I was afraid of that.

I am out of ideas then, unless it the ride-height is REALLY low, or too high?

Mike Bonkalski 05-25-2004 12:10 PM

Now what I understand is that they are running out of room where the spring plate meets the swing arm. He said it seems like the swing arm is too long.

MotoSook 05-25-2004 12:23 PM

Mike, did you notice this before the rear mono ball install? You've got aluminum trailing arms right?

Mike Bonkalski 05-25-2004 12:28 PM

I will have to go through the PO documentation to see if I can find any old alignment info. I didn't take any toe measurements prior to dismantling to install the monoballs and bushings. I didn't notice any odd handling characteristics while driving the car, but it was mostly highway and around town driving.

Yes, the trailing arms are Al.

--Mike

Mike Bonkalski 05-25-2004 12:29 PM

I don't think the ride height is too low, or too high. I measured it at 25.25" prior to the alignment.

--Mike

MotoSook 05-25-2004 12:36 PM

You've got an SC suspension on a 71 chassis right?

Perhaps someone out there who has done the conversion can tell you what is up. I can't think of anyhting off the top of my head right now....wish it were a Friday afternoon, I'd run over too Jms and get greasy just to find out why...I'm intrigued!

Mike Bonkalski 05-25-2004 12:40 PM

Its a Carrera rear suspension on a '71. Jim and Joe are both working on it now. I'm about the head out of work now and go on over.

--Mike

MotoSook 05-25-2004 12:48 PM

I wonder if your problem exisited before and you just didn't notice.

ChrisBennet 05-25-2004 02:31 PM

On an 80's 911 when you crank in a lot of negative rear camber (more than 1.5deg for example) it causes the suspension to toe out. At some point the there isn't enough adjustment in the spring plate to get toe back (in) where you want it. The fix is to lengthen some holes in the spring plate. I can't remember which ones.
-Chris

RoninLB 05-25-2004 07:14 PM

spring plate

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1085541275.jpg

Chuck Moreland 05-25-2004 09:57 PM

The problem exists on the passenger side only? Could be a bent trailing arm.

Is the toe eccentric freely rotating 360 degrees? or is it limited in travel due to the rear bolt holes Ron is referencing above? You can test this by removing one of the bolts, or replacing it temporarily with a smaller diameter bolt. If so, use a file to elongate the slotted holes.

Are you make the adjustment with the weight off the wheels? You'll find more range if you unweight it.

Chuck Moreland 05-25-2004 10:02 PM

If none of that works, some clever work with a welder and a file and you can move the toe hole forward a bit on the spring plate.

Or some clever work with a welder and lathe and you can accentuate the eccentric adjuster a small bit.

There is always a solution.

jluetjen 05-26-2004 02:46 AM

My car has the same problem and I put to down the the previous owner parking it againsts a guard rail at Watkins Glen. I attributed it to bent chassis, although I haven't been able to confirm it with measurements. I opened up the hole that you described, but I also had to do the same thing to the slotted adjuster hole to give it enough travel.

Since the problem existed with the original steel bananas and the aluminum bananas that I have since installed, I still believe that it is the chassis or torque tube.

Thomas Owen 05-26-2004 02:58 AM

You may find here that the problem already existed. Perhaps you can make some basic measurements across the underside of the car and see if the torsion tube is swept back on the right side from impact.
Good luck-

Mike Bonkalski 05-26-2004 04:03 AM

What would have the highest margin of safety, using a smaller bolt or enlarging the hole?

It concerns me a bit to start shaving off metal from connection points or using non-spec bolts.

--Mike

Tim Polzin 05-26-2004 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Thomas Owen
You may find here that the problem already existed. Perhaps you can make some basic measurements across the underside of the car and see if the torsion tube is swept back on the right side from impact.
Good luck-

An old 70T I previously owned had exactly that problem. Half an hour on the frame rack cured it and dialed right in afterwards.

Tim

Mike Bonkalski 05-26-2004 05:52 AM

Just talked to the alignment guy. It looks as if the aluminum trailing arm is bent, the rest of the frame is spot on.

Off to the classifieds to find a trailing arm. Thanks for everyone's help with this issue.

--Mike


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.