![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1
|
K&N in my SC
I have an '82 SC and am thinking about putting one of those drop-in K&N air filters in... Anyone have any experience w/ these filters in this car? I hear it'll add 7-10 HP.
Comments? Suggestions? |
||
![]() |
|
Me like track days
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 10,209
|
LOC - Load of crap.
Its reusable. Its oily. It has good marketing and great implications of performance increases, but on your SC........LOC. Craig @RS
__________________
- Craig 3.4L, SC heads, 964 cams, B&B headers, K27 HF ZC turbo, Ruf IC. WUR & RPM switch, IA fuel head, Zork, G50/50 5 speed. 438 RWHP / 413 RWTQ - "930 is the wild slut you sleep with who tries to kill you every time you "get it on" - Quote by Gabe Movie: 930 on the dyno |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,955
|
Your first post!
You are off to an auspicious start! ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
More Likeable IRL
|
put your hard hat on mojo. try a search for this very debated subject. i will sell you my k&n for 30 bucks. im in the sunnyvale mt view area.
__________________
78SC PRC Spec911 (sold 12/15) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7I6HCCKrVQ Now gone: 03 996TT/75 slicklid 3.oL carb'd hotrod 15 Rubicon JK/07.5 LMM Duramax 4x/86 Ski Nautique Correct Craft |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: bottom left corner of the world
Posts: 22,795
|
No no no.
|
||
![]() |
|
Black and Blue
|
7-10 hp huh? almost as much as a Cool Collar! Anyway, the consensus around here, and i believe someone had some dyno numbers, shows no difference in HP. I have also heard that the K&N doesnt catch as much dirt as the stock ones either...so most people just stick with stock. Welcome to the board, lots of information here and lots of really good guys who know their Porsches.
__________________
Kemo 1978 911 SC Non-Sunroof Coupe, two tone Primer Black and SWEPCO Blue, Currently serving as a Track Whore 1981 911 SC Sunroof Coupe, Pacific Blue Project, Future Daily Driver |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
mojo werkin, welcome aboard. lovin the large bay area group. i dont think the K&N will do a damn thing for your horsepower. the filter isnt the governing factor to airflow. the airsensor plate is the tight spot.
__________________
poof! gone |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
It might add 7-10hp on a Mustang, but you'll get exactly zero gain on your SC. Bruce Anderson tells of running back to back dyno tests - one with the factory air filter in place and one with *no* filter in place (can't get much more free-flowing than that) and the hp gain on the dyno was exactly zero.
Don't waste your money. Mike
__________________
Mike 1976 Euro 911 3.2 w/10.3 compression & SSIs 22/29 torsions, 22/22 adjustable sways, Carrera brakes |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Washington state
Posts: 893
|
Ben, or rather Mojo, I have one word for you. Paper.
__________________
'80 SC |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2004
Location: washington,DC
Posts: 1,087
|
K&N, what heartbreaks are made of.l`ve used them for years with no problems,on bikes,ski`s,cars and trikes.One of the cool things about K&N is that they can fit pretty much anything.lf you`re stuck on the advantages of a filter made of wood,good luck finishing that one off projectile you`re working on.Factory filters are okay,but K&N has saved my a$$ many times.Next time you build a car/bike from scratch enjoy the search for an OEM wood filter to fit your application.
__________________
my life begins at 150MPH |
||
![]() |
|
Unregistered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: a wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 55,652
|
I have a K&N filter for my SC, I also have a good stock paper filter. I've switched back and forth and I can't tell any difference in power between the two.
I really doubt you will get any increase in power. The only advantage to a K&N on a CIS 911 is you won't have to spend as much money on replacement filters. Of course you will have to buy the filter, and the cleaner, and the oil...... it will take a lot of miles before you are actually saving any money. My recommendation is to save your money. The only reason I have one is because it came with the car. Buying one is throwing money away. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Centennial, CO, USA
Posts: 1,405
|
When I bought my SC in Feb, I pulled the KN and went with OEM filter (and put in a popoff valve). Primarily based on what was discussed here. You can have mine for the price of shipping. Funny thing is that I have had a KN my daughter's 200TQ for nearly 10 years and I did not realized they were so bad news until recently. She packed in that Audi a couple months ago so I have not replaced that KN as well. HTH.
__________________
Bill '72 911T-2.4S MFI Vintage Racer(heart out), '80 911SC Weissach,'95.5 S6 Avant Wunderwagen & 2005 997 C2S new ride. Last edited by zotman72; 06-04-2004 at 07:50 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 3,336
|
I bought one for my 85 carrera,it was my first "mod" purchase. I didnt notice any advantageson on the road. However, I did conduct a butt dyno test at willow springs, in the streight away I felt a bit quicker with the K&N (I didnt get passed) I felt plenty of power left in the car.
I switched to paper for 1 run so I could see if there was a diference, It was a sutle diference, but it was definetly there in the steight, it felt a bit slower, almost as if I was going up a mild hill So I came to the conclusion, that it may not be significant but there is a small advantage with the K&N with the throtle wide OPEN
__________________
85 911 SuperSport No more looking! The jewel is mine! 89 Jeep Wrangler A jewel in the rough 2000 Grand Cherokee Family Wagon with Jewels on board |
||
![]() |
|
Unregistered
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: a wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 55,652
|
If you had a carrera you could possibly see a power increase using a K&N, but with CIS on an SC I don't believe you will.
On a CIS equipped engine the biggest restriction in the intake is the air flow metering plate, not the filter. Since I know of no way to make the air flow sensor plate flow more air with less restriction (without pressurizing the intake charge) there's not much you can do to change that. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 21
|
If you like a louder intake and how it looks, buy one and install it.
If you question it's effect on engine longevity, don't do it. If you expect more power, you won't get it, or at least anything that you can feel or measure. Dynos are not consistent run to run. Atmospheric conditions change, and the dynos have some error per run. If it's 5%, then you don't know if the 200hp result is 190 or 210. That is one reason why the K&Ns are so controversial, the claimed gain is so small you cannot definitively prove it makes more power. If they claimed 30hp, that you could measure on a dyno without a doubt. The butt dyno is truly subjective, not objective. Many times more noise is interpreted as more power. There are too many perception/expectation influences. I wouldn't believe anyone's butt dyno with regard to a small gain/loss. |
||
![]() |
|