![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA USA
Posts: 2,938
|
EFI cams for 930
Hi
I am going to recam my 3.0L 930 motor this winter. I will port the heads at the same time. Specs now are stock comp pistons, Carrera intake, K27 turbo, DTA EFI. If I ever blow it up and have to repiston, I will bump the comp. I asked a couple people what cams they recomend for my street use. One said with my EFI I can use 964 cams. The other said that 964 cams are too much and recomended SC cams. Anybody have and more input? Thanks Dean
__________________
Dean 911 SC turbo, 3.0L 930 motor, G50, 930 brakes, DTA EFI, 352 RWHP DynoDynamic dyno, |
||
![]() |
|
Metal Guru
|
Bruce Anderson recommends SC cams for turbo applications.
__________________
Paul B. '91 964 3.3 Turbo Port matched, SC cams, K27/K29 turbo, Roush Performance custom headers w/Tial MV-S dual wastegates, Rarlyl8 muffler, LWFW, GT2 clutch & PP, BL wur, factory RS shifter, RS mounts, FVD timing mod, Big Reds, H&R Coilovers, ESB spring plates- 210 lb |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St Charles Il
Posts: 1,417
|
One huge benefit of ditching the CIS is getting to run much more wild cams. Check into the GT2 or GT2 evo grinds. I think that is what Juan is using now.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Camarillo, Ca.
Posts: 2,418
|
You can use both(even with CIS).With lower comp you may want sc grinds to keep the torque a little lower on the rpms. P.M. camgrinder, He can set you straight.
__________________
Aaron. ![]() Burnham Performance https://www.instagram.com/burnhamperformance/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California
Posts: 926
|
I would use the 964 grind. The SC cam has been the normal upgrade cam for 930 turbos for a long time.
Using the K27-7200 with 964 cams will be just as driveable and make more HP. The super cup grind is a slightly hotter than the 964 and would make more peak HP, but might be hard to tune in a cis engine.
__________________
John Dougherty Dougherty Racing Cams |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
|
Why not go in the middle and install Carrera CAMs? I used these with the K27-7200 and it was an awesome combination!
I can sell u mine for $200 if ur interested?
__________________
Merv '89 911 Turbo Cab Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California
Posts: 926
|
The Carrera cams casting no. 930105147 9R / 930105148 9R have the same grind as the early SC. They are just timed in the engine different. If the left cam has the scavenge pump extension installed, $200 is a hell of a deal.
__________________
John Dougherty Dougherty Racing Cams |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,911
|
SC/Carrera cams are hotter than 930 ones but still qute mild (so mild that they can be used with CIS). If you are looking for ultimate power (and I bet you do , GT2 evo is way to go, EFI will sure support it and I seriusly doubt you'll see any problems with intake-reversion either.
Only real problem (or advantage, depending how you see it) is your ultra-low 6.5:1 C/R. You can use heaps of boost with it, especially if intercooled but it will be a dog off-boost.
__________________
Thank you for your time, |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA USA
Posts: 2,938
|
Thanks for the replys
I bought this motor used so I don't really know the comp ratio. I also don't know what cams are in it. but it was timed like it had 930 cams so I assume they are 930 cams. The strange thing is the off boost performance is awesume, even when I had CIS. Chris Bennet drove the car and said off boost it drives like a regular SC. And it does. I don't know if it is because of the gearing or what. I have never driven a 4 speed 930 so I don't know how to compare. John, I have aftermarket EFI I have heard from a few people who have the GT2 evos and they all love those cams. I think they all have higher comp. ratio than stock though. I still think the GT2 evos would be too radica for this old fart. So I am leaning toward the 964s. Thanks again Dean
__________________
Dean 911 SC turbo, 3.0L 930 motor, G50, 930 brakes, DTA EFI, 352 RWHP DynoDynamic dyno, |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,911
|
If it's a 3.0 930 engine then it has 6.5:1 C/R. Later intercooled 3.3L 930 engines got C/R bumped to 7.0:1 beacuse intake charge wasn't so hot.
Talking about off-boost responce...yeah, they do pull decently well compared to N/A engine of same size but compared to "on boost" torque they feel little lethargic. Factory tried to offset this by using choked 32mm intake ports (I guess that you didn't port-matched your 36mm Carrera intake to 32mm 930 heads?) , which raised gas velocity at low revs and thus provided better torque down low. It also strangled the flow at high revs, lowering the ultimate power. I think you can expect some loss in low-RPM torque if porting heads and using hot cams but with that rev-happy short-stroke engine, better cams and low C/R pistons you can have heaps of power higher up. I don't think your 0.5 points lower C/R will do much difference with GT Evo cams, but i guess 964 are pretty hot too (considering that they are made for twin-plugged high C/R engines). With 1.1 bar of boost, EFI, ported heads, hot cams and good intercooler you are looking at 420HP to 460hp ...
__________________
Thank you for your time, |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA USA
Posts: 2,938
|
Goran,
I don't know if the PO replaced the pistons or not. I bet it was re-ringed though. You are correct, I didn't port match my heads. The Carrera intake is 41 mm and my ports are 34mm. So that is a huge step. When I had CIS I had 328 RWHP and 318 ftlbs of torque to the wheels. So I guess I am going with 964 cams Thanks again Dean
__________________
Dean 911 SC turbo, 3.0L 930 motor, G50, 930 brakes, DTA EFI, 352 RWHP DynoDynamic dyno, |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California
Posts: 926
|
Do a normal compression test. That should verify which piston you have. Sounds to me like someone has been into the engine and has done some type of modification.
__________________
John Dougherty Dougherty Racing Cams |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA USA
Posts: 2,938
|
I will do a comp check sometime. When I got the motor, I did a leakdown and the worst cyl was 2.5 % leakdown. The rest were 1 to 1.5%. So I thought it was re-ringed at least.
Dean
__________________
Dean 911 SC turbo, 3.0L 930 motor, G50, 930 brakes, DTA EFI, 352 RWHP DynoDynamic dyno, |
||
![]() |
|